Cargando…

Advantages of a multi-state approach in surgical research: how intermediate events and risk factor profile affect the prognosis of a patient with locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Standard survival analysis fails to give insight into what happens to a patient after a first outcome event (like first relapse of a disease). Multi-state models are a useful tool for analyzing survival data when different treatments and results (intermediate events) can occur. Aim of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manzini, G., Ettrich, T. J., Kremer, M., Kornmann, M., Henne-Bruns, D., Eikema, D. A., Schlattmann, P., de Wreede, L. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5811976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0476-z
_version_ 1783299953635885056
author Manzini, G.
Ettrich, T. J.
Kremer, M.
Kornmann, M.
Henne-Bruns, D.
Eikema, D. A.
Schlattmann, P.
de Wreede, L. C.
author_facet Manzini, G.
Ettrich, T. J.
Kremer, M.
Kornmann, M.
Henne-Bruns, D.
Eikema, D. A.
Schlattmann, P.
de Wreede, L. C.
author_sort Manzini, G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Standard survival analysis fails to give insight into what happens to a patient after a first outcome event (like first relapse of a disease). Multi-state models are a useful tool for analyzing survival data when different treatments and results (intermediate events) can occur. Aim of this study was to implement a multi-state model on data of patients with rectal cancer to illustrate the advantages of multi-state analysis in comparison to standard survival analysis. METHODS: We re-analyzed data from the RCT FOGT-2 study by using a multi-state model. Based on the results we defined a high and low risk reference patient. Using dynamic prediction, we estimated how the survival probability changes as more information about the clinical history of the patient becomes available. RESULTS: A patient with stage UICC IIIc (vs UICC II) has a higher risk to develop distant metastasis (DM) or both DM and local recurrence (LR) if he/she discontinues chemotherapy within 6 months or between 6 and 12 months, as well as after the completion of 12 months CTx with HR 3.55 (p = 0.026), 5.33 (p = 0.001) and 3.37 (p < 0.001), respectively. He/she also has a higher risk to die after the development of DM (HR 1.72, p = 0.023). Anterior resection vs. abdominoperineal amputation means 63% risk reduction to develop DM or both DM and LR (HR 0.37, p = 0.003) after discontinuation of chemotherapy between 6 and 12 months. After development of LR, a woman has a 4.62 times higher risk to die (p = 0.006). A high risk reference patient has an estimated 43% 5-year survival probability at start of CTx, whereas for a low risk patient this is 79%. After the development of DM 1 year later, the high risk patient has an estimated 5-year survival probability of 11% and the low risk patient one of 21%. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-state models help to gain additional insight into the complex events after start of treatment. Dynamic prediction shows how survival probabilities change by progression of the clinical history. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0476-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5811976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58119762018-02-15 Advantages of a multi-state approach in surgical research: how intermediate events and risk factor profile affect the prognosis of a patient with locally advanced rectal cancer Manzini, G. Ettrich, T. J. Kremer, M. Kornmann, M. Henne-Bruns, D. Eikema, D. A. Schlattmann, P. de Wreede, L. C. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Standard survival analysis fails to give insight into what happens to a patient after a first outcome event (like first relapse of a disease). Multi-state models are a useful tool for analyzing survival data when different treatments and results (intermediate events) can occur. Aim of this study was to implement a multi-state model on data of patients with rectal cancer to illustrate the advantages of multi-state analysis in comparison to standard survival analysis. METHODS: We re-analyzed data from the RCT FOGT-2 study by using a multi-state model. Based on the results we defined a high and low risk reference patient. Using dynamic prediction, we estimated how the survival probability changes as more information about the clinical history of the patient becomes available. RESULTS: A patient with stage UICC IIIc (vs UICC II) has a higher risk to develop distant metastasis (DM) or both DM and local recurrence (LR) if he/she discontinues chemotherapy within 6 months or between 6 and 12 months, as well as after the completion of 12 months CTx with HR 3.55 (p = 0.026), 5.33 (p = 0.001) and 3.37 (p < 0.001), respectively. He/she also has a higher risk to die after the development of DM (HR 1.72, p = 0.023). Anterior resection vs. abdominoperineal amputation means 63% risk reduction to develop DM or both DM and LR (HR 0.37, p = 0.003) after discontinuation of chemotherapy between 6 and 12 months. After development of LR, a woman has a 4.62 times higher risk to die (p = 0.006). A high risk reference patient has an estimated 43% 5-year survival probability at start of CTx, whereas for a low risk patient this is 79%. After the development of DM 1 year later, the high risk patient has an estimated 5-year survival probability of 11% and the low risk patient one of 21%. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-state models help to gain additional insight into the complex events after start of treatment. Dynamic prediction shows how survival probabilities change by progression of the clinical history. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0476-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5811976/ /pubmed/29439652 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0476-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Manzini, G.
Ettrich, T. J.
Kremer, M.
Kornmann, M.
Henne-Bruns, D.
Eikema, D. A.
Schlattmann, P.
de Wreede, L. C.
Advantages of a multi-state approach in surgical research: how intermediate events and risk factor profile affect the prognosis of a patient with locally advanced rectal cancer
title Advantages of a multi-state approach in surgical research: how intermediate events and risk factor profile affect the prognosis of a patient with locally advanced rectal cancer
title_full Advantages of a multi-state approach in surgical research: how intermediate events and risk factor profile affect the prognosis of a patient with locally advanced rectal cancer
title_fullStr Advantages of a multi-state approach in surgical research: how intermediate events and risk factor profile affect the prognosis of a patient with locally advanced rectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Advantages of a multi-state approach in surgical research: how intermediate events and risk factor profile affect the prognosis of a patient with locally advanced rectal cancer
title_short Advantages of a multi-state approach in surgical research: how intermediate events and risk factor profile affect the prognosis of a patient with locally advanced rectal cancer
title_sort advantages of a multi-state approach in surgical research: how intermediate events and risk factor profile affect the prognosis of a patient with locally advanced rectal cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5811976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439652
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0476-z
work_keys_str_mv AT manzinig advantagesofamultistateapproachinsurgicalresearchhowintermediateeventsandriskfactorprofileaffecttheprognosisofapatientwithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT ettrichtj advantagesofamultistateapproachinsurgicalresearchhowintermediateeventsandriskfactorprofileaffecttheprognosisofapatientwithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT kremerm advantagesofamultistateapproachinsurgicalresearchhowintermediateeventsandriskfactorprofileaffecttheprognosisofapatientwithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT kornmannm advantagesofamultistateapproachinsurgicalresearchhowintermediateeventsandriskfactorprofileaffecttheprognosisofapatientwithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT hennebrunsd advantagesofamultistateapproachinsurgicalresearchhowintermediateeventsandriskfactorprofileaffecttheprognosisofapatientwithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT eikemada advantagesofamultistateapproachinsurgicalresearchhowintermediateeventsandriskfactorprofileaffecttheprognosisofapatientwithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT schlattmannp advantagesofamultistateapproachinsurgicalresearchhowintermediateeventsandriskfactorprofileaffecttheprognosisofapatientwithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer
AT dewreedelc advantagesofamultistateapproachinsurgicalresearchhowintermediateeventsandriskfactorprofileaffecttheprognosisofapatientwithlocallyadvancedrectalcancer