Cargando…
Evaluation of spray and oral delivery of Newcastle disease I2 vaccine in chicken reared by smallholder farmers in central Ethiopia
BACKGROUND: Newcastle disease (ND) is a highly infectious disease causing considerable economic losses to poultry farmers worldwide. Conventional vaccine delivery methods are not suitable for smallholder and rural poultry producers, and thus appropriate vaccination methods need to be sought. This st...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1355-x |
_version_ | 1783299962748010496 |
---|---|
author | Mebrahtu, Kibrom Teshale, S. Esatu, Wendimeneh Habte, Tadios Gelaye, Esayas |
author_facet | Mebrahtu, Kibrom Teshale, S. Esatu, Wendimeneh Habte, Tadios Gelaye, Esayas |
author_sort | Mebrahtu, Kibrom |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Newcastle disease (ND) is a highly infectious disease causing considerable economic losses to poultry farmers worldwide. Conventional vaccine delivery methods are not suitable for smallholder and rural poultry producers, and thus appropriate vaccination methods need to be sought. This study was carried out with the main objective of evaluating the efficacy of ND I2 vaccine delivered via drinking water and spray under smallholder farmers’ condition in Minjar-Shenkora district, central Ethiopia. Twenty households were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. Chickens owned by the selected households were randomly assigned to one of the three intervention groups. Blood samples were collected regularly for antibody assay from individual chicken vaccinated with ND I2 vaccine using different routes. RESULTS: At baseline, there was no difference in antibody titer among the experimental groups. After the first and booster vaccinations, the three vaccinated groups had significantly higher antibody titer (P < 0.001) than the unvaccinated control group. Interestingly, there was no statistically significant difference in antibody titer among the vaccinated groups. Out of the 40 chicken in the unvaccinated control only 14 had antibody titter≥ log(2)(3). Similarly 19/37 of chicken in the drinking water group, 19/37 of chicken in the eye drop group and 20/40 chicken in the spray group had antibody titer ≥ log(2)(3). Two weeks after the first vaccination the proportion of chicken with antibody titer ≥ log(2)(3) rose to 23/37, 30/37 and 29/40 in the group vaccinated via drinking water, eye drop and spray, respectively. The proportion remained low in unvaccinated group. Hundred percent of the vaccinated chicken survived after infection with the virulent ND virus (Alemaya strain); whereas only 40% survived from the unvaccinated control group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that ND I2 vaccine administered via drinking water and spray under smallholder farmers’ situation provoked protective antibody level similar to the eye drop method. The use of ND I2 vaccine could contribute to food security if used by rural poultry farmers properly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5812036 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58120362018-02-15 Evaluation of spray and oral delivery of Newcastle disease I2 vaccine in chicken reared by smallholder farmers in central Ethiopia Mebrahtu, Kibrom Teshale, S. Esatu, Wendimeneh Habte, Tadios Gelaye, Esayas BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Newcastle disease (ND) is a highly infectious disease causing considerable economic losses to poultry farmers worldwide. Conventional vaccine delivery methods are not suitable for smallholder and rural poultry producers, and thus appropriate vaccination methods need to be sought. This study was carried out with the main objective of evaluating the efficacy of ND I2 vaccine delivered via drinking water and spray under smallholder farmers’ condition in Minjar-Shenkora district, central Ethiopia. Twenty households were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. Chickens owned by the selected households were randomly assigned to one of the three intervention groups. Blood samples were collected regularly for antibody assay from individual chicken vaccinated with ND I2 vaccine using different routes. RESULTS: At baseline, there was no difference in antibody titer among the experimental groups. After the first and booster vaccinations, the three vaccinated groups had significantly higher antibody titer (P < 0.001) than the unvaccinated control group. Interestingly, there was no statistically significant difference in antibody titer among the vaccinated groups. Out of the 40 chicken in the unvaccinated control only 14 had antibody titter≥ log(2)(3). Similarly 19/37 of chicken in the drinking water group, 19/37 of chicken in the eye drop group and 20/40 chicken in the spray group had antibody titer ≥ log(2)(3). Two weeks after the first vaccination the proportion of chicken with antibody titer ≥ log(2)(3) rose to 23/37, 30/37 and 29/40 in the group vaccinated via drinking water, eye drop and spray, respectively. The proportion remained low in unvaccinated group. Hundred percent of the vaccinated chicken survived after infection with the virulent ND virus (Alemaya strain); whereas only 40% survived from the unvaccinated control group. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that ND I2 vaccine administered via drinking water and spray under smallholder farmers’ situation provoked protective antibody level similar to the eye drop method. The use of ND I2 vaccine could contribute to food security if used by rural poultry farmers properly. BioMed Central 2018-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5812036/ /pubmed/29439696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1355-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mebrahtu, Kibrom Teshale, S. Esatu, Wendimeneh Habte, Tadios Gelaye, Esayas Evaluation of spray and oral delivery of Newcastle disease I2 vaccine in chicken reared by smallholder farmers in central Ethiopia |
title | Evaluation of spray and oral delivery of Newcastle disease I2 vaccine in chicken reared by smallholder farmers in central Ethiopia |
title_full | Evaluation of spray and oral delivery of Newcastle disease I2 vaccine in chicken reared by smallholder farmers in central Ethiopia |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of spray and oral delivery of Newcastle disease I2 vaccine in chicken reared by smallholder farmers in central Ethiopia |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of spray and oral delivery of Newcastle disease I2 vaccine in chicken reared by smallholder farmers in central Ethiopia |
title_short | Evaluation of spray and oral delivery of Newcastle disease I2 vaccine in chicken reared by smallholder farmers in central Ethiopia |
title_sort | evaluation of spray and oral delivery of newcastle disease i2 vaccine in chicken reared by smallholder farmers in central ethiopia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812036/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1355-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mebrahtukibrom evaluationofsprayandoraldeliveryofnewcastlediseasei2vaccineinchickenrearedbysmallholderfarmersincentralethiopia AT teshales evaluationofsprayandoraldeliveryofnewcastlediseasei2vaccineinchickenrearedbysmallholderfarmersincentralethiopia AT esatuwendimeneh evaluationofsprayandoraldeliveryofnewcastlediseasei2vaccineinchickenrearedbysmallholderfarmersincentralethiopia AT habtetadios evaluationofsprayandoraldeliveryofnewcastlediseasei2vaccineinchickenrearedbysmallholderfarmersincentralethiopia AT gelayeesayas evaluationofsprayandoraldeliveryofnewcastlediseasei2vaccineinchickenrearedbysmallholderfarmersincentralethiopia |