Cargando…

Comparison of Computerized and Standard Cognitive Test in Thai Memory Clinic

BACKGROUND: Computer-based Thai Cognitive Test or Computer-based Thai Mental State Examination (cTMSE) was developed aiming to help doctors to easily get the accurate results of TMSE in a routine, busy outpatient clinics. The purpose of this study was to compare the evaluation process in terms of fe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dharmasaroja, Pornpatr A., Ratanakorn, Disya, Nidhinandana, Samart, Charernboon, Thammanard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29456359
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_373_17
_version_ 1783299987581435904
author Dharmasaroja, Pornpatr A.
Ratanakorn, Disya
Nidhinandana, Samart
Charernboon, Thammanard
author_facet Dharmasaroja, Pornpatr A.
Ratanakorn, Disya
Nidhinandana, Samart
Charernboon, Thammanard
author_sort Dharmasaroja, Pornpatr A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computer-based Thai Cognitive Test or Computer-based Thai Mental State Examination (cTMSE) was developed aiming to help doctors to easily get the accurate results of TMSE in a routine, busy outpatient clinics. The purpose of this study was to compare the evaluation process in terms of feasibility, duration of the test, participants/administrator preference, and the results of cognitive test between cTMSE and the standard Thai Mental State Examination (sTMSE). METHODS: Twenty-two elderly participants (>60 years old) who were not demented and 22 patients with mild-to-moderate dementia were included in the study. All participants would be asked to have TMSE by standard method (sTMSE) and computer-based method (cTMSE), at least 2 weeks and up to 2 months apart. Scores and duration of the test were compared using dependent paired t-test. Agreement of the tests between two methods and Kappa statistics were analyzed. RESULTS: Paired t-test showed no significant difference in scores between the two methods (mean sTMSE vs. cTMSE: 22.84 vs. 22.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [−0.465] to 0.987, P = 0.524). Percent of agreement between the two methods was 92.5%, with the Kappa of 0.85 (P < 0.001). Duration of the test by sTMSE was slightly shorter than the cTMSE (7.31 min vs. 7.97 min, 95% CI: [−1.159] to [−0.175], P = 0.09). Overall, participants liked being tested by cTMSE more than sTMSE. CONCLUSION: Computer-based TMSE was feasible to use and accurate for screening in aging adults and for cognitive evaluation in patients with mild-to-moderate dementia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5812140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58121402018-02-16 Comparison of Computerized and Standard Cognitive Test in Thai Memory Clinic Dharmasaroja, Pornpatr A. Ratanakorn, Disya Nidhinandana, Samart Charernboon, Thammanard J Neurosci Rural Pract Case Series BACKGROUND: Computer-based Thai Cognitive Test or Computer-based Thai Mental State Examination (cTMSE) was developed aiming to help doctors to easily get the accurate results of TMSE in a routine, busy outpatient clinics. The purpose of this study was to compare the evaluation process in terms of feasibility, duration of the test, participants/administrator preference, and the results of cognitive test between cTMSE and the standard Thai Mental State Examination (sTMSE). METHODS: Twenty-two elderly participants (>60 years old) who were not demented and 22 patients with mild-to-moderate dementia were included in the study. All participants would be asked to have TMSE by standard method (sTMSE) and computer-based method (cTMSE), at least 2 weeks and up to 2 months apart. Scores and duration of the test were compared using dependent paired t-test. Agreement of the tests between two methods and Kappa statistics were analyzed. RESULTS: Paired t-test showed no significant difference in scores between the two methods (mean sTMSE vs. cTMSE: 22.84 vs. 22.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [−0.465] to 0.987, P = 0.524). Percent of agreement between the two methods was 92.5%, with the Kappa of 0.85 (P < 0.001). Duration of the test by sTMSE was slightly shorter than the cTMSE (7.31 min vs. 7.97 min, 95% CI: [−1.159] to [−0.175], P = 0.09). Overall, participants liked being tested by cTMSE more than sTMSE. CONCLUSION: Computer-based TMSE was feasible to use and accurate for screening in aging adults and for cognitive evaluation in patients with mild-to-moderate dementia. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5812140/ /pubmed/29456359 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_373_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Case Series
Dharmasaroja, Pornpatr A.
Ratanakorn, Disya
Nidhinandana, Samart
Charernboon, Thammanard
Comparison of Computerized and Standard Cognitive Test in Thai Memory Clinic
title Comparison of Computerized and Standard Cognitive Test in Thai Memory Clinic
title_full Comparison of Computerized and Standard Cognitive Test in Thai Memory Clinic
title_fullStr Comparison of Computerized and Standard Cognitive Test in Thai Memory Clinic
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Computerized and Standard Cognitive Test in Thai Memory Clinic
title_short Comparison of Computerized and Standard Cognitive Test in Thai Memory Clinic
title_sort comparison of computerized and standard cognitive test in thai memory clinic
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29456359
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jnrp.jnrp_373_17
work_keys_str_mv AT dharmasarojapornpatra comparisonofcomputerizedandstandardcognitivetestinthaimemoryclinic
AT ratanakorndisya comparisonofcomputerizedandstandardcognitivetestinthaimemoryclinic
AT nidhinandanasamart comparisonofcomputerizedandstandardcognitivetestinthaimemoryclinic
AT charernboonthammanard comparisonofcomputerizedandstandardcognitivetestinthaimemoryclinic