Cargando…
FuSpot: a web-based tool for visual evaluation of fusion candidates
BACKGROUND: Gene fusions often occur in cancer cells and in some cases are the main driver of oncogenesis. Correct identification of oncogenic gene fusions thus has implications for targeted cancer therapy. Recognition of this potential has led to the development of a myriad of sequencing-based fusi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4486-3 |
_version_ | 1783300005485871104 |
---|---|
author | Killian, Jackson A. Topiwala, Taha M. Pelletier, Alex R. Frankhouser, David E. Yan, Pearlly S. Bundschuh, Ralf |
author_facet | Killian, Jackson A. Topiwala, Taha M. Pelletier, Alex R. Frankhouser, David E. Yan, Pearlly S. Bundschuh, Ralf |
author_sort | Killian, Jackson A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gene fusions often occur in cancer cells and in some cases are the main driver of oncogenesis. Correct identification of oncogenic gene fusions thus has implications for targeted cancer therapy. Recognition of this potential has led to the development of a myriad of sequencing-based fusion detection tools. However, given the same input, many of these detectors will find different fusion points or claim different sets of supporting data. Furthermore, the rate at which these tools falsely detect fusion events in data varies greatly. This discrepancy between tools underscores the fact that computation algorithms still cannot perfectly evaluate evidence; especially when provided with small amounts of supporting data as is typical in fusion detection. We assert that when evidence is provided in an easily digestible form, humans are more proficient in identifying true positives from false positives. RESULTS: We have developed a web tool that, given the genomic coordinates of a candidate fusion breakpoint, will extract fusion and non-fusion reads adjacent to the fusion point from partner transcripts, and color code reads by transcript origin and read orientation for ease of intuitive inspection by the user. Fusion partner transcript read alignments are performed using a novel variant of the Smith-Waterman algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Combined with dynamic filtering parameters, the visualization provided by our tool introduces a powerful new investigative step that allows researchers to comprehensively evaluate fusion evidence. Additionally, this allows quick identification of false positives that may deceive most fusion detectors, thus eliminating unnecessary gene fusion validation. We apply our visualization tool to publicly available datasets and provide examples of true as well as false positives reported by open source fusion detection tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5812216 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58122162018-02-15 FuSpot: a web-based tool for visual evaluation of fusion candidates Killian, Jackson A. Topiwala, Taha M. Pelletier, Alex R. Frankhouser, David E. Yan, Pearlly S. Bundschuh, Ralf BMC Genomics Software BACKGROUND: Gene fusions often occur in cancer cells and in some cases are the main driver of oncogenesis. Correct identification of oncogenic gene fusions thus has implications for targeted cancer therapy. Recognition of this potential has led to the development of a myriad of sequencing-based fusion detection tools. However, given the same input, many of these detectors will find different fusion points or claim different sets of supporting data. Furthermore, the rate at which these tools falsely detect fusion events in data varies greatly. This discrepancy between tools underscores the fact that computation algorithms still cannot perfectly evaluate evidence; especially when provided with small amounts of supporting data as is typical in fusion detection. We assert that when evidence is provided in an easily digestible form, humans are more proficient in identifying true positives from false positives. RESULTS: We have developed a web tool that, given the genomic coordinates of a candidate fusion breakpoint, will extract fusion and non-fusion reads adjacent to the fusion point from partner transcripts, and color code reads by transcript origin and read orientation for ease of intuitive inspection by the user. Fusion partner transcript read alignments are performed using a novel variant of the Smith-Waterman algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: Combined with dynamic filtering parameters, the visualization provided by our tool introduces a powerful new investigative step that allows researchers to comprehensively evaluate fusion evidence. Additionally, this allows quick identification of false positives that may deceive most fusion detectors, thus eliminating unnecessary gene fusion validation. We apply our visualization tool to publicly available datasets and provide examples of true as well as false positives reported by open source fusion detection tools. BioMed Central 2018-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5812216/ /pubmed/29439649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4486-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Software Killian, Jackson A. Topiwala, Taha M. Pelletier, Alex R. Frankhouser, David E. Yan, Pearlly S. Bundschuh, Ralf FuSpot: a web-based tool for visual evaluation of fusion candidates |
title | FuSpot: a web-based tool for visual evaluation of fusion candidates |
title_full | FuSpot: a web-based tool for visual evaluation of fusion candidates |
title_fullStr | FuSpot: a web-based tool for visual evaluation of fusion candidates |
title_full_unstemmed | FuSpot: a web-based tool for visual evaluation of fusion candidates |
title_short | FuSpot: a web-based tool for visual evaluation of fusion candidates |
title_sort | fuspot: a web-based tool for visual evaluation of fusion candidates |
topic | Software |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812216/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4486-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT killianjacksona fuspotawebbasedtoolforvisualevaluationoffusioncandidates AT topiwalataham fuspotawebbasedtoolforvisualevaluationoffusioncandidates AT pelletieralexr fuspotawebbasedtoolforvisualevaluationoffusioncandidates AT frankhouserdavide fuspotawebbasedtoolforvisualevaluationoffusioncandidates AT yanpearllys fuspotawebbasedtoolforvisualevaluationoffusioncandidates AT bundschuhralf fuspotawebbasedtoolforvisualevaluationoffusioncandidates |