Cargando…

Serum and blood based biomarkers for lung cancer screening: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death for both men and women. Although low-dose CT (LDCT) is recommended for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations and may decrease lung cancer mortality, there is a need to improve the accuracy of lung...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chu, Gavin C. W., Lazare, Kim, Sullivan, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4024-3
_version_ 1783300008658862080
author Chu, Gavin C. W.
Lazare, Kim
Sullivan, Frank
author_facet Chu, Gavin C. W.
Lazare, Kim
Sullivan, Frank
author_sort Chu, Gavin C. W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death for both men and women. Although low-dose CT (LDCT) is recommended for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations and may decrease lung cancer mortality, there is a need to improve the accuracy of lung cancer screening to decrease over-diagnosis and morbidity. Blood and serum-based biomarkers, including EarlyCDT-lung and microRNA based biomarkers, are promising adjuncts to LDCT in lung cancer screening. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of EarlyCDT-lung, micro-RNA signature classifier (MSC), and miR-test, and their impact on lung cancer-related mortality and all-cause mortality. METHODS: References were identified using searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and Ovid Medline® from January 2000 to November 2015. Phase three or greater studies in the English language evaluating the diagnostic performance of EarlyCDT-lung, MSC, and miR-test were selected for inclusion. RESULTS: Three phase 3 studies were identified, one evaluating EarlyCDT-lung, one evaluating miR-Test, and one evaluating MSC respectively. No phase 4 or 5 studies were identified. All three biomarker assays show promise for the detection of lung cancer. MSC shows promise when used in conjunction with LDCT for lung cancer detection, achieving a positive likelihood ratio of 18.6 if both LDCT and MSC are positive, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.03 if both LDCT and MSC are negative. However, there is a paucity of high-quality studies that can guide clinical implementation. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no high quality evidence to support or guide the implementation of these biomarkers in clinical practice. Reports of further research at stages four and five for these, and other promising methods, is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4024-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5812229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58122292018-02-15 Serum and blood based biomarkers for lung cancer screening: a systematic review Chu, Gavin C. W. Lazare, Kim Sullivan, Frank BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death for both men and women. Although low-dose CT (LDCT) is recommended for lung cancer screening in high-risk populations and may decrease lung cancer mortality, there is a need to improve the accuracy of lung cancer screening to decrease over-diagnosis and morbidity. Blood and serum-based biomarkers, including EarlyCDT-lung and microRNA based biomarkers, are promising adjuncts to LDCT in lung cancer screening. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of EarlyCDT-lung, micro-RNA signature classifier (MSC), and miR-test, and their impact on lung cancer-related mortality and all-cause mortality. METHODS: References were identified using searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and Ovid Medline® from January 2000 to November 2015. Phase three or greater studies in the English language evaluating the diagnostic performance of EarlyCDT-lung, MSC, and miR-test were selected for inclusion. RESULTS: Three phase 3 studies were identified, one evaluating EarlyCDT-lung, one evaluating miR-Test, and one evaluating MSC respectively. No phase 4 or 5 studies were identified. All three biomarker assays show promise for the detection of lung cancer. MSC shows promise when used in conjunction with LDCT for lung cancer detection, achieving a positive likelihood ratio of 18.6 if both LDCT and MSC are positive, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.03 if both LDCT and MSC are negative. However, there is a paucity of high-quality studies that can guide clinical implementation. CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no high quality evidence to support or guide the implementation of these biomarkers in clinical practice. Reports of further research at stages four and five for these, and other promising methods, is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4024-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5812229/ /pubmed/29439651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4024-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chu, Gavin C. W.
Lazare, Kim
Sullivan, Frank
Serum and blood based biomarkers for lung cancer screening: a systematic review
title Serum and blood based biomarkers for lung cancer screening: a systematic review
title_full Serum and blood based biomarkers for lung cancer screening: a systematic review
title_fullStr Serum and blood based biomarkers for lung cancer screening: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Serum and blood based biomarkers for lung cancer screening: a systematic review
title_short Serum and blood based biomarkers for lung cancer screening: a systematic review
title_sort serum and blood based biomarkers for lung cancer screening: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4024-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chugavincw serumandbloodbasedbiomarkersforlungcancerscreeningasystematicreview
AT lazarekim serumandbloodbasedbiomarkersforlungcancerscreeningasystematicreview
AT sullivanfrank serumandbloodbasedbiomarkersforlungcancerscreeningasystematicreview