Cargando…

What supervisors and universities can do to enhance doctoral student experience (and how they can help themselves)

Over the past two decades, there has been a flurry of government papers and policy reports worldwide calling for increased number and diversity of doctoral researchers and a broadening of the curriculum to meet the developing needs of respective national ‘knowledge-driven’ economies. This has been f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duke, Dawn C., Denicolo, Pam M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx090
_version_ 1783300036531060736
author Duke, Dawn C.
Denicolo, Pam M.
author_facet Duke, Dawn C.
Denicolo, Pam M.
author_sort Duke, Dawn C.
collection PubMed
description Over the past two decades, there has been a flurry of government papers and policy reports worldwide calling for increased number and diversity of doctoral researchers and a broadening of the curriculum to meet the developing needs of respective national ‘knowledge-driven’ economies. This has been followed by position papers and best practice examples of employability skills development in boundary-crossing doctoral programmes, especially in response to these initiatives. However, there is a disassociation between this ample literature expounding the new doctorate with its broader remit, inclusivity and production of ‘industry-ready’ graduates and the comparatively sparse literature on the doctoral candidates’ experiences of their programmes and career readiness. Within this review, we briefly outline international government initiatives and examples of the responses by Life Science and Biomedical doctoral programmes to address these various challenges. Furthermore, we explore the recent literature on the lived experience of doctoral researchers by examining their perception of the recent changes to the research context to make recommendations for universities and supervisors on how to better support an ever more diverse doctoral population for a wide range of career opportunities. Examples of how doctoral researchers themselves can make the best of currently available opportunities are also provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5812516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58125162018-02-23 What supervisors and universities can do to enhance doctoral student experience (and how they can help themselves) Duke, Dawn C. Denicolo, Pam M. FEMS Microbiol Lett Minireview Over the past two decades, there has been a flurry of government papers and policy reports worldwide calling for increased number and diversity of doctoral researchers and a broadening of the curriculum to meet the developing needs of respective national ‘knowledge-driven’ economies. This has been followed by position papers and best practice examples of employability skills development in boundary-crossing doctoral programmes, especially in response to these initiatives. However, there is a disassociation between this ample literature expounding the new doctorate with its broader remit, inclusivity and production of ‘industry-ready’ graduates and the comparatively sparse literature on the doctoral candidates’ experiences of their programmes and career readiness. Within this review, we briefly outline international government initiatives and examples of the responses by Life Science and Biomedical doctoral programmes to address these various challenges. Furthermore, we explore the recent literature on the lived experience of doctoral researchers by examining their perception of the recent changes to the research context to make recommendations for universities and supervisors on how to better support an ever more diverse doctoral population for a wide range of career opportunities. Examples of how doctoral researchers themselves can make the best of currently available opportunities are also provided. Oxford University Press 2017-05-04 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5812516/ /pubmed/28472431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx090 Text en © FEMS 2017. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Minireview
Duke, Dawn C.
Denicolo, Pam M.
What supervisors and universities can do to enhance doctoral student experience (and how they can help themselves)
title What supervisors and universities can do to enhance doctoral student experience (and how they can help themselves)
title_full What supervisors and universities can do to enhance doctoral student experience (and how they can help themselves)
title_fullStr What supervisors and universities can do to enhance doctoral student experience (and how they can help themselves)
title_full_unstemmed What supervisors and universities can do to enhance doctoral student experience (and how they can help themselves)
title_short What supervisors and universities can do to enhance doctoral student experience (and how they can help themselves)
title_sort what supervisors and universities can do to enhance doctoral student experience (and how they can help themselves)
topic Minireview
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28472431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx090
work_keys_str_mv AT dukedawnc whatsupervisorsanduniversitiescandotoenhancedoctoralstudentexperienceandhowtheycanhelpthemselves
AT denicolopamm whatsupervisorsanduniversitiescandotoenhancedoctoralstudentexperienceandhowtheycanhelpthemselves