Cargando…

Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation

OBJECTIVE: The measure of body surface area (BSA) is a standard for planning optimal dosing in oncology. This index is derived from a model having questionable performances. In this study, we proposed measurement of BSA from whole body CT images (iBSA). We tested the reliability of iBSA assessments...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iannessi, Antoine, Beaumont, Hubert, Hebert, Christophe, Dittlot, Claire, Falewee, Marie Noëlle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29444120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192124
_version_ 1783300058653917184
author Iannessi, Antoine
Beaumont, Hubert
Hebert, Christophe
Dittlot, Claire
Falewee, Marie Noëlle
author_facet Iannessi, Antoine
Beaumont, Hubert
Hebert, Christophe
Dittlot, Claire
Falewee, Marie Noëlle
author_sort Iannessi, Antoine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The measure of body surface area (BSA) is a standard for planning optimal dosing in oncology. This index is derived from a model having questionable performances. In this study, we proposed measurement of BSA from whole body CT images (iBSA). We tested the reliability of iBSA assessments and simulated the impact of our approach on patient chemotherapy dosage planning. METHODS: We first evaluated accuracy and precision of iBSA in measuring 14 phantom and 11 CT test-retest images.Secondly, we retrospectively analyzed 26 whole body PET-CT scans to evaluate inter-method variability between iBSA and the most used anthropomorphic models, notably the “Du Bois and Du Bois” model. Finally, we simulated the impact on chemotherapy dose planning of capecitabine based on iBSA. RESULTS: Precision and accuracy of iBSA measurement featured a standard deviation of 1.11% and a mean error of 1.53%. Inter-method variability between iBSA and “Du Bois and Du Bois” assessment featured a standard deviation of 4.11% leading to a reclassification rate of capecitabine of 32.5%. CONCLUSIONS: iBSA could help the oncologist in standardizing assessments for chemotherapy planning. iBSA could also be relevant for applications such as comprehensive body composition and provide a sensitive measurement for changes related to nutritional intake or other metabolism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5812609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58126092018-02-28 Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation Iannessi, Antoine Beaumont, Hubert Hebert, Christophe Dittlot, Claire Falewee, Marie Noëlle PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The measure of body surface area (BSA) is a standard for planning optimal dosing in oncology. This index is derived from a model having questionable performances. In this study, we proposed measurement of BSA from whole body CT images (iBSA). We tested the reliability of iBSA assessments and simulated the impact of our approach on patient chemotherapy dosage planning. METHODS: We first evaluated accuracy and precision of iBSA in measuring 14 phantom and 11 CT test-retest images.Secondly, we retrospectively analyzed 26 whole body PET-CT scans to evaluate inter-method variability between iBSA and the most used anthropomorphic models, notably the “Du Bois and Du Bois” model. Finally, we simulated the impact on chemotherapy dose planning of capecitabine based on iBSA. RESULTS: Precision and accuracy of iBSA measurement featured a standard deviation of 1.11% and a mean error of 1.53%. Inter-method variability between iBSA and “Du Bois and Du Bois” assessment featured a standard deviation of 4.11% leading to a reclassification rate of capecitabine of 32.5%. CONCLUSIONS: iBSA could help the oncologist in standardizing assessments for chemotherapy planning. iBSA could also be relevant for applications such as comprehensive body composition and provide a sensitive measurement for changes related to nutritional intake or other metabolism. Public Library of Science 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5812609/ /pubmed/29444120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192124 Text en © 2018 Iannessi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Iannessi, Antoine
Beaumont, Hubert
Hebert, Christophe
Dittlot, Claire
Falewee, Marie Noëlle
Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation
title Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation
title_full Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation
title_fullStr Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation
title_short Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation
title_sort computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29444120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192124
work_keys_str_mv AT iannessiantoine computertomographybasedbodysurfaceareaevaluationfordrugdosagequantitativeradiologyversusanthropomorphicevaluation
AT beaumonthubert computertomographybasedbodysurfaceareaevaluationfordrugdosagequantitativeradiologyversusanthropomorphicevaluation
AT hebertchristophe computertomographybasedbodysurfaceareaevaluationfordrugdosagequantitativeradiologyversusanthropomorphicevaluation
AT dittlotclaire computertomographybasedbodysurfaceareaevaluationfordrugdosagequantitativeradiologyversusanthropomorphicevaluation
AT faleweemarienoelle computertomographybasedbodysurfaceareaevaluationfordrugdosagequantitativeradiologyversusanthropomorphicevaluation