Cargando…
Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation
OBJECTIVE: The measure of body surface area (BSA) is a standard for planning optimal dosing in oncology. This index is derived from a model having questionable performances. In this study, we proposed measurement of BSA from whole body CT images (iBSA). We tested the reliability of iBSA assessments...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29444120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192124 |
_version_ | 1783300058653917184 |
---|---|
author | Iannessi, Antoine Beaumont, Hubert Hebert, Christophe Dittlot, Claire Falewee, Marie Noëlle |
author_facet | Iannessi, Antoine Beaumont, Hubert Hebert, Christophe Dittlot, Claire Falewee, Marie Noëlle |
author_sort | Iannessi, Antoine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The measure of body surface area (BSA) is a standard for planning optimal dosing in oncology. This index is derived from a model having questionable performances. In this study, we proposed measurement of BSA from whole body CT images (iBSA). We tested the reliability of iBSA assessments and simulated the impact of our approach on patient chemotherapy dosage planning. METHODS: We first evaluated accuracy and precision of iBSA in measuring 14 phantom and 11 CT test-retest images.Secondly, we retrospectively analyzed 26 whole body PET-CT scans to evaluate inter-method variability between iBSA and the most used anthropomorphic models, notably the “Du Bois and Du Bois” model. Finally, we simulated the impact on chemotherapy dose planning of capecitabine based on iBSA. RESULTS: Precision and accuracy of iBSA measurement featured a standard deviation of 1.11% and a mean error of 1.53%. Inter-method variability between iBSA and “Du Bois and Du Bois” assessment featured a standard deviation of 4.11% leading to a reclassification rate of capecitabine of 32.5%. CONCLUSIONS: iBSA could help the oncologist in standardizing assessments for chemotherapy planning. iBSA could also be relevant for applications such as comprehensive body composition and provide a sensitive measurement for changes related to nutritional intake or other metabolism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5812609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58126092018-02-28 Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation Iannessi, Antoine Beaumont, Hubert Hebert, Christophe Dittlot, Claire Falewee, Marie Noëlle PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: The measure of body surface area (BSA) is a standard for planning optimal dosing in oncology. This index is derived from a model having questionable performances. In this study, we proposed measurement of BSA from whole body CT images (iBSA). We tested the reliability of iBSA assessments and simulated the impact of our approach on patient chemotherapy dosage planning. METHODS: We first evaluated accuracy and precision of iBSA in measuring 14 phantom and 11 CT test-retest images.Secondly, we retrospectively analyzed 26 whole body PET-CT scans to evaluate inter-method variability between iBSA and the most used anthropomorphic models, notably the “Du Bois and Du Bois” model. Finally, we simulated the impact on chemotherapy dose planning of capecitabine based on iBSA. RESULTS: Precision and accuracy of iBSA measurement featured a standard deviation of 1.11% and a mean error of 1.53%. Inter-method variability between iBSA and “Du Bois and Du Bois” assessment featured a standard deviation of 4.11% leading to a reclassification rate of capecitabine of 32.5%. CONCLUSIONS: iBSA could help the oncologist in standardizing assessments for chemotherapy planning. iBSA could also be relevant for applications such as comprehensive body composition and provide a sensitive measurement for changes related to nutritional intake or other metabolism. Public Library of Science 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5812609/ /pubmed/29444120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192124 Text en © 2018 Iannessi et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Iannessi, Antoine Beaumont, Hubert Hebert, Christophe Dittlot, Claire Falewee, Marie Noëlle Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation |
title | Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation |
title_full | Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation |
title_fullStr | Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation |
title_short | Computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: Quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation |
title_sort | computer tomography-based body surface area evaluation for drug dosage: quantitative radiology versus anthropomorphic evaluation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29444120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iannessiantoine computertomographybasedbodysurfaceareaevaluationfordrugdosagequantitativeradiologyversusanthropomorphicevaluation AT beaumonthubert computertomographybasedbodysurfaceareaevaluationfordrugdosagequantitativeradiologyversusanthropomorphicevaluation AT hebertchristophe computertomographybasedbodysurfaceareaevaluationfordrugdosagequantitativeradiologyversusanthropomorphicevaluation AT dittlotclaire computertomographybasedbodysurfaceareaevaluationfordrugdosagequantitativeradiologyversusanthropomorphicevaluation AT faleweemarienoelle computertomographybasedbodysurfaceareaevaluationfordrugdosagequantitativeradiologyversusanthropomorphicevaluation |