Cargando…

Cross-priming induces immunodomination in the presence of viral MHC class I inhibition

Viruses have evolved mechanisms of MHCI inhibition in order to evade recognition by cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells (CTLs), which is well-illustrated by our prior studies on cowpox virus (CPXV) that encodes potent MHCI inhibitors. Deletion of CPXV viral MHCI inhibitors markedly attenuated in vivo infection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lauron, Elvin J., Yang, Liping, Elliott, Jabari I., Gainey, Maria D., Fremont, Daved H., Yokoyama, Wayne M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29444189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006883
_version_ 1783300072043184128
author Lauron, Elvin J.
Yang, Liping
Elliott, Jabari I.
Gainey, Maria D.
Fremont, Daved H.
Yokoyama, Wayne M.
author_facet Lauron, Elvin J.
Yang, Liping
Elliott, Jabari I.
Gainey, Maria D.
Fremont, Daved H.
Yokoyama, Wayne M.
author_sort Lauron, Elvin J.
collection PubMed
description Viruses have evolved mechanisms of MHCI inhibition in order to evade recognition by cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells (CTLs), which is well-illustrated by our prior studies on cowpox virus (CPXV) that encodes potent MHCI inhibitors. Deletion of CPXV viral MHCI inhibitors markedly attenuated in vivo infection due to effects on CTL effector function, not priming. However, the CTL response to CPXV in C57BL/6 mice is dominated by a single peptide antigen presented by H-2K(b). Here we evaluated the effect of viral MHCI inhibition on immunodominant (IDE) and subdominant epitopes (SDE) as this has not been thoroughly examined. We found that cross-priming, but not cross-dressing, is the main mechanism driving IDE and SDE CTL responses following CPXV infection. Secretion of the immunodominant antigen was not required for immunodominance. Instead, immunodominance was caused by CTL interference, known as immunodomination. Both immunodomination and cross-priming of SDEs were not affected by MHCI inhibition. SDE-specific CTLs were also capable of exerting immunodomination during primary and secondary responses, which was in part dependent on antigen abundance. Furthermore, CTL responses directed solely against SDEs protected against lethal CPXV infection, but only in the absence of the CPXV MHCI inhibitors. Thus, both SDE and IDE responses can contribute to protective immunity against poxviruses, implying that these principles apply to poxvirus-based vaccines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5812664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58126642018-02-28 Cross-priming induces immunodomination in the presence of viral MHC class I inhibition Lauron, Elvin J. Yang, Liping Elliott, Jabari I. Gainey, Maria D. Fremont, Daved H. Yokoyama, Wayne M. PLoS Pathog Research Article Viruses have evolved mechanisms of MHCI inhibition in order to evade recognition by cytotoxic CD8(+) T cells (CTLs), which is well-illustrated by our prior studies on cowpox virus (CPXV) that encodes potent MHCI inhibitors. Deletion of CPXV viral MHCI inhibitors markedly attenuated in vivo infection due to effects on CTL effector function, not priming. However, the CTL response to CPXV in C57BL/6 mice is dominated by a single peptide antigen presented by H-2K(b). Here we evaluated the effect of viral MHCI inhibition on immunodominant (IDE) and subdominant epitopes (SDE) as this has not been thoroughly examined. We found that cross-priming, but not cross-dressing, is the main mechanism driving IDE and SDE CTL responses following CPXV infection. Secretion of the immunodominant antigen was not required for immunodominance. Instead, immunodominance was caused by CTL interference, known as immunodomination. Both immunodomination and cross-priming of SDEs were not affected by MHCI inhibition. SDE-specific CTLs were also capable of exerting immunodomination during primary and secondary responses, which was in part dependent on antigen abundance. Furthermore, CTL responses directed solely against SDEs protected against lethal CPXV infection, but only in the absence of the CPXV MHCI inhibitors. Thus, both SDE and IDE responses can contribute to protective immunity against poxviruses, implying that these principles apply to poxvirus-based vaccines. Public Library of Science 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5812664/ /pubmed/29444189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006883 Text en © 2018 Lauron et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lauron, Elvin J.
Yang, Liping
Elliott, Jabari I.
Gainey, Maria D.
Fremont, Daved H.
Yokoyama, Wayne M.
Cross-priming induces immunodomination in the presence of viral MHC class I inhibition
title Cross-priming induces immunodomination in the presence of viral MHC class I inhibition
title_full Cross-priming induces immunodomination in the presence of viral MHC class I inhibition
title_fullStr Cross-priming induces immunodomination in the presence of viral MHC class I inhibition
title_full_unstemmed Cross-priming induces immunodomination in the presence of viral MHC class I inhibition
title_short Cross-priming induces immunodomination in the presence of viral MHC class I inhibition
title_sort cross-priming induces immunodomination in the presence of viral mhc class i inhibition
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29444189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006883
work_keys_str_mv AT lauronelvinj crosspriminginducesimmunodominationinthepresenceofviralmhcclassiinhibition
AT yangliping crosspriminginducesimmunodominationinthepresenceofviralmhcclassiinhibition
AT elliottjabarii crosspriminginducesimmunodominationinthepresenceofviralmhcclassiinhibition
AT gaineymariad crosspriminginducesimmunodominationinthepresenceofviralmhcclassiinhibition
AT fremontdavedh crosspriminginducesimmunodominationinthepresenceofviralmhcclassiinhibition
AT yokoyamawaynem crosspriminginducesimmunodominationinthepresenceofviralmhcclassiinhibition