Cargando…

Hepatitis C virus deep sequencing for sub-genotype identification in mixed infections: A real-life experience

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of the new generation of hepatitis C treatments named direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) depends on the genotype, subtype, and resistance-associated substitutions present in individual patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate a massive sequencing platform for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: del Campo, José A., Parra-Sánchez, Manuel, Figueruela, Blanca, García-Rey, Silvia, Quer, Josep, Gregori, Josep, Bernal, Samuel, Grande, Lourdes, Palomares, José C., Romero-Gómez, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29253705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2017.12.016
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of the new generation of hepatitis C treatments named direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) depends on the genotype, subtype, and resistance-associated substitutions present in individual patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate a massive sequencing platform for the analysis of genotypes and subtypes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in order to optimize therapy. METHODS: A total of 84 patients with hepatitis C were analyzed. The routine genotyping methodology for HCV used at the study institution (Versant HCV Assay, LiPA) was compared with a deep sequencing platform (454/GS-Junior and Illumina MiSeq). RESULTS: The mean viral load in these HCV patients was 6.89 × 10(6) ± 7.02 × 10(5). Viral genotypes analyzed by LiPA were distributed as follows: 26% genotype 1a (22/84), 55% genotype 1b (46/84), 1% genotype 1 (1/84), 2.5% genotype 3 (2/84), 6% genotype 3a (5/84), 6% genotype 4a/c/d (5/84). When analyzed by deep sequencing, the samples were distributed as follows: 27% genotype 1a (23/84), 56% genotype 1b (47/84), 8% genotype 3a (7/84), 5% genotype 4d (4/84), 2.5% genotype 4f (2/84). Six of the 84 patients (7%) were infected with more than one subtype. Among these, 33% (2/6) failed DAA-based triple therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of mixed infection could explain some treatment failures. Accurate determination of viral genotypes and subtypes would allow optimal patient management and improve the effectiveness of DAA therapy.