Cargando…

Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The heart rate (HR) and metabolic (VO(2)) responses to treadmill running using the GlideTrak™ body weight support system have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare the submaximal and maximal HR and VO(2) responses to normal-weight treadmill running (TMR) t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perry, Jordan, Johnson, Wayne, Fellingham, Gilbert W., Vehrs, Pat R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2017.06.002
_version_ 1783300078970077184
author Perry, Jordan
Johnson, Wayne
Fellingham, Gilbert W.
Vehrs, Pat R.
author_facet Perry, Jordan
Johnson, Wayne
Fellingham, Gilbert W.
Vehrs, Pat R.
author_sort Perry, Jordan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The heart rate (HR) and metabolic (VO(2)) responses to treadmill running using the GlideTrak™ body weight support system have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare the submaximal and maximal HR and VO(2) responses to normal-weight treadmill running (TMR) to treadmill running with body weight support provided by the GlideTrak™ (GTR). METHODS: Twenty participants (11 males; 9 females) 18 to 26 years of age voluntarily participated in this study. Each participant completed two exercise tests in each mode of running: a maximal graded exercise test to compare maximal HR and VO(2) values and a submaximal exercise test to compare the HR-VO(2) relationship. RESULTS: Maximal HR and VO(2) values were significantly (p < 0.001) lower during GTR (183.4 ± 9.1 bpm, 38.1 ± 7.2 mL kg(−1) min(−1)) compared to TMR (194.3 ± 8.6 bpm, 49.5 ± 8.9 kg(−1) min(−1)). There was a significant difference in the HR-VO(2) relationship between GTR and TMR. Compared to TMR, exercising at a HR of 140 bpm resulted in a VO(2) that was 4.0 mL kg(−1) min(−1) lower during GTR. At the VO(2) associated with a HR of 140 bpm during TMR, the HR during GTR was 16 bpm higher. During GTR at intensities of exercise up to an RER of 1.0, only 8 participants achieved vigorous intensities of aerobic exercise defined as 64-90% of VO(2)max. CONCLUSION: Exercising with the GlideTrak™ body weight support system may not provide the same cardiorespiratory training stimulus as normal-weight treadmill running.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5812853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58128532018-03-14 Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™ Perry, Jordan Johnson, Wayne Fellingham, Gilbert W. Vehrs, Pat R. J Exerc Sci Fit Original Article BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The heart rate (HR) and metabolic (VO(2)) responses to treadmill running using the GlideTrak™ body weight support system have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare the submaximal and maximal HR and VO(2) responses to normal-weight treadmill running (TMR) to treadmill running with body weight support provided by the GlideTrak™ (GTR). METHODS: Twenty participants (11 males; 9 females) 18 to 26 years of age voluntarily participated in this study. Each participant completed two exercise tests in each mode of running: a maximal graded exercise test to compare maximal HR and VO(2) values and a submaximal exercise test to compare the HR-VO(2) relationship. RESULTS: Maximal HR and VO(2) values were significantly (p < 0.001) lower during GTR (183.4 ± 9.1 bpm, 38.1 ± 7.2 mL kg(−1) min(−1)) compared to TMR (194.3 ± 8.6 bpm, 49.5 ± 8.9 kg(−1) min(−1)). There was a significant difference in the HR-VO(2) relationship between GTR and TMR. Compared to TMR, exercising at a HR of 140 bpm resulted in a VO(2) that was 4.0 mL kg(−1) min(−1) lower during GTR. At the VO(2) associated with a HR of 140 bpm during TMR, the HR during GTR was 16 bpm higher. During GTR at intensities of exercise up to an RER of 1.0, only 8 participants achieved vigorous intensities of aerobic exercise defined as 64-90% of VO(2)max. CONCLUSION: Exercising with the GlideTrak™ body weight support system may not provide the same cardiorespiratory training stimulus as normal-weight treadmill running. The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness 2017-06 2017-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5812853/ /pubmed/29541129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2017.06.002 Text en © 2017 The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Perry, Jordan
Johnson, Wayne
Fellingham, Gilbert W.
Vehrs, Pat R.
Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™
title Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™
title_full Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™
title_fullStr Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™
title_full_unstemmed Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™
title_short Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™
title_sort heart rate and vo(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the glidetrak™
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2017.06.002
work_keys_str_mv AT perryjordan heartrateandvo2responsestotreadmillrunningwithbodyweightsupportusingtheglidetrak
AT johnsonwayne heartrateandvo2responsestotreadmillrunningwithbodyweightsupportusingtheglidetrak
AT fellinghamgilbertw heartrateandvo2responsestotreadmillrunningwithbodyweightsupportusingtheglidetrak
AT vehrspatr heartrateandvo2responsestotreadmillrunningwithbodyweightsupportusingtheglidetrak