Cargando…
Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The heart rate (HR) and metabolic (VO(2)) responses to treadmill running using the GlideTrak™ body weight support system have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare the submaximal and maximal HR and VO(2) responses to normal-weight treadmill running (TMR) t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2017.06.002 |
_version_ | 1783300078970077184 |
---|---|
author | Perry, Jordan Johnson, Wayne Fellingham, Gilbert W. Vehrs, Pat R. |
author_facet | Perry, Jordan Johnson, Wayne Fellingham, Gilbert W. Vehrs, Pat R. |
author_sort | Perry, Jordan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The heart rate (HR) and metabolic (VO(2)) responses to treadmill running using the GlideTrak™ body weight support system have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare the submaximal and maximal HR and VO(2) responses to normal-weight treadmill running (TMR) to treadmill running with body weight support provided by the GlideTrak™ (GTR). METHODS: Twenty participants (11 males; 9 females) 18 to 26 years of age voluntarily participated in this study. Each participant completed two exercise tests in each mode of running: a maximal graded exercise test to compare maximal HR and VO(2) values and a submaximal exercise test to compare the HR-VO(2) relationship. RESULTS: Maximal HR and VO(2) values were significantly (p < 0.001) lower during GTR (183.4 ± 9.1 bpm, 38.1 ± 7.2 mL kg(−1) min(−1)) compared to TMR (194.3 ± 8.6 bpm, 49.5 ± 8.9 kg(−1) min(−1)). There was a significant difference in the HR-VO(2) relationship between GTR and TMR. Compared to TMR, exercising at a HR of 140 bpm resulted in a VO(2) that was 4.0 mL kg(−1) min(−1) lower during GTR. At the VO(2) associated with a HR of 140 bpm during TMR, the HR during GTR was 16 bpm higher. During GTR at intensities of exercise up to an RER of 1.0, only 8 participants achieved vigorous intensities of aerobic exercise defined as 64-90% of VO(2)max. CONCLUSION: Exercising with the GlideTrak™ body weight support system may not provide the same cardiorespiratory training stimulus as normal-weight treadmill running. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5812853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58128532018-03-14 Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™ Perry, Jordan Johnson, Wayne Fellingham, Gilbert W. Vehrs, Pat R. J Exerc Sci Fit Original Article BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The heart rate (HR) and metabolic (VO(2)) responses to treadmill running using the GlideTrak™ body weight support system have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare the submaximal and maximal HR and VO(2) responses to normal-weight treadmill running (TMR) to treadmill running with body weight support provided by the GlideTrak™ (GTR). METHODS: Twenty participants (11 males; 9 females) 18 to 26 years of age voluntarily participated in this study. Each participant completed two exercise tests in each mode of running: a maximal graded exercise test to compare maximal HR and VO(2) values and a submaximal exercise test to compare the HR-VO(2) relationship. RESULTS: Maximal HR and VO(2) values were significantly (p < 0.001) lower during GTR (183.4 ± 9.1 bpm, 38.1 ± 7.2 mL kg(−1) min(−1)) compared to TMR (194.3 ± 8.6 bpm, 49.5 ± 8.9 kg(−1) min(−1)). There was a significant difference in the HR-VO(2) relationship between GTR and TMR. Compared to TMR, exercising at a HR of 140 bpm resulted in a VO(2) that was 4.0 mL kg(−1) min(−1) lower during GTR. At the VO(2) associated with a HR of 140 bpm during TMR, the HR during GTR was 16 bpm higher. During GTR at intensities of exercise up to an RER of 1.0, only 8 participants achieved vigorous intensities of aerobic exercise defined as 64-90% of VO(2)max. CONCLUSION: Exercising with the GlideTrak™ body weight support system may not provide the same cardiorespiratory training stimulus as normal-weight treadmill running. The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness 2017-06 2017-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5812853/ /pubmed/29541129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2017.06.002 Text en © 2017 The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Perry, Jordan Johnson, Wayne Fellingham, Gilbert W. Vehrs, Pat R. Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™ |
title | Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™ |
title_full | Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™ |
title_fullStr | Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™ |
title_full_unstemmed | Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™ |
title_short | Heart rate and VO(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the GlideTrak™ |
title_sort | heart rate and vo(2) responses to treadmill running with body weight support using the glidetrak™ |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5812853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2017.06.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perryjordan heartrateandvo2responsestotreadmillrunningwithbodyweightsupportusingtheglidetrak AT johnsonwayne heartrateandvo2responsestotreadmillrunningwithbodyweightsupportusingtheglidetrak AT fellinghamgilbertw heartrateandvo2responsestotreadmillrunningwithbodyweightsupportusingtheglidetrak AT vehrspatr heartrateandvo2responsestotreadmillrunningwithbodyweightsupportusingtheglidetrak |