Cargando…
Retinotopic effects of visual attention revealed by dichoptic multifocal pupillography
Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) has recently been shown to be able to measure cortical function. Here we assessed 44 regions of the central 60 degrees of the visual fields of each eye concurrently in 7 minutes/test. We examined how foveally- and peripherally-directed attention...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21196-1 |
_version_ | 1783300104333033472 |
---|---|
author | Rosli, Yanti Carle, Corinne Frances Ho, Yiling James, Andrew Charles Kolic, Maria Rohan, Emilie Marie Françoise Maddess, Ted |
author_facet | Rosli, Yanti Carle, Corinne Frances Ho, Yiling James, Andrew Charles Kolic, Maria Rohan, Emilie Marie Françoise Maddess, Ted |
author_sort | Rosli, Yanti |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) has recently been shown to be able to measure cortical function. Here we assessed 44 regions of the central 60 degrees of the visual fields of each eye concurrently in 7 minutes/test. We examined how foveally- and peripherally-directed attention changed response sensitivity and delay across the 44 visual field locations/eye. Four experiments were completed comparing white, yellow and blue stimulus arrays. Experiments 1 to 4 tested 16, 23, 9 and 6 subjects, 49/54 being unique. Experiment 1, Experiments 2 and 3, and Experiment 4 used three variants of the mfPOP method that provided increasingly improved signal quality. Experiments 1 to 3 examined centrally directed attention, and Experiment 4 compared effects of attention directed to different peripheral targets. Attention reduced the sensitivity of the peripheral locations in Experiment 1, but only for the white stimuli not yellow. Experiment 2 confirmed that result. Experiment 3 showed that blue stimuli behaved like white. Peripheral attention showed increased sensitivity around the attentional targets. The results are discussed in terms of the cortical inputs to the pupillary system. The results agree with those from multifocal and other fMRI and VEP studies. mfPOP may be a useful adjunct to those methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5813021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58130212018-02-21 Retinotopic effects of visual attention revealed by dichoptic multifocal pupillography Rosli, Yanti Carle, Corinne Frances Ho, Yiling James, Andrew Charles Kolic, Maria Rohan, Emilie Marie Françoise Maddess, Ted Sci Rep Article Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) has recently been shown to be able to measure cortical function. Here we assessed 44 regions of the central 60 degrees of the visual fields of each eye concurrently in 7 minutes/test. We examined how foveally- and peripherally-directed attention changed response sensitivity and delay across the 44 visual field locations/eye. Four experiments were completed comparing white, yellow and blue stimulus arrays. Experiments 1 to 4 tested 16, 23, 9 and 6 subjects, 49/54 being unique. Experiment 1, Experiments 2 and 3, and Experiment 4 used three variants of the mfPOP method that provided increasingly improved signal quality. Experiments 1 to 3 examined centrally directed attention, and Experiment 4 compared effects of attention directed to different peripheral targets. Attention reduced the sensitivity of the peripheral locations in Experiment 1, but only for the white stimuli not yellow. Experiment 2 confirmed that result. Experiment 3 showed that blue stimuli behaved like white. Peripheral attention showed increased sensitivity around the attentional targets. The results are discussed in terms of the cortical inputs to the pupillary system. The results agree with those from multifocal and other fMRI and VEP studies. mfPOP may be a useful adjunct to those methods. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5813021/ /pubmed/29445236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21196-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Rosli, Yanti Carle, Corinne Frances Ho, Yiling James, Andrew Charles Kolic, Maria Rohan, Emilie Marie Françoise Maddess, Ted Retinotopic effects of visual attention revealed by dichoptic multifocal pupillography |
title | Retinotopic effects of visual attention revealed by dichoptic multifocal pupillography |
title_full | Retinotopic effects of visual attention revealed by dichoptic multifocal pupillography |
title_fullStr | Retinotopic effects of visual attention revealed by dichoptic multifocal pupillography |
title_full_unstemmed | Retinotopic effects of visual attention revealed by dichoptic multifocal pupillography |
title_short | Retinotopic effects of visual attention revealed by dichoptic multifocal pupillography |
title_sort | retinotopic effects of visual attention revealed by dichoptic multifocal pupillography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-21196-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosliyanti retinotopiceffectsofvisualattentionrevealedbydichopticmultifocalpupillography AT carlecorinnefrances retinotopiceffectsofvisualattentionrevealedbydichopticmultifocalpupillography AT hoyiling retinotopiceffectsofvisualattentionrevealedbydichopticmultifocalpupillography AT jamesandrewcharles retinotopiceffectsofvisualattentionrevealedbydichopticmultifocalpupillography AT kolicmaria retinotopiceffectsofvisualattentionrevealedbydichopticmultifocalpupillography AT rohanemiliemariefrancoise retinotopiceffectsofvisualattentionrevealedbydichopticmultifocalpupillography AT maddessted retinotopiceffectsofvisualattentionrevealedbydichopticmultifocalpupillography |