Cargando…
How many cases of disease in a pedigree imply familial disease?
The ability to perform whole‐exome and, increasingly, whole‐genome sequencing on large numbers of individuals has led to increased efforts to identify rare genetic variants that affect the risk of both common and rare diseases. In such applications, it is important to identify families that are segr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29058319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ahg.12222 |
_version_ | 1783300136541093888 |
---|---|
author | Dudbridge, Frank Brown, Suzanne J. Ward, Lynley Wilson, Scott G. Walsh, John P. |
author_facet | Dudbridge, Frank Brown, Suzanne J. Ward, Lynley Wilson, Scott G. Walsh, John P. |
author_sort | Dudbridge, Frank |
collection | PubMed |
description | The ability to perform whole‐exome and, increasingly, whole‐genome sequencing on large numbers of individuals has led to increased efforts to identify rare genetic variants that affect the risk of both common and rare diseases. In such applications, it is important to identify families that are segregating the rare variants of interest. For rare diseases or rare familial forms of common diseases, pedigrees with multiple affected members are clearly harbouring risk variants. For more common diseases, however, it may be unclear whether a family with a few affected members is segregating a familial disease, is the result of multiple sporadic cases, or is a mixture of familial cases and phenocopies. We provide calculations for the probability that a family is harbouring familial disease, presented in general terms that admit working guidelines for selecting families for current sequencing studies. Using examples motivated by our own studies of thyroid cancer and published studies of colorectal cancer, we show that for common diseases, families with exactly two affected first‐degree relatives have only a moderate probability of segregating familial disease, but this probability is higher for families with three or more affected relatives, and those families should therefore be prioritised in sequencing studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5813157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58131572018-02-21 How many cases of disease in a pedigree imply familial disease? Dudbridge, Frank Brown, Suzanne J. Ward, Lynley Wilson, Scott G. Walsh, John P. Ann Hum Genet Short Communications The ability to perform whole‐exome and, increasingly, whole‐genome sequencing on large numbers of individuals has led to increased efforts to identify rare genetic variants that affect the risk of both common and rare diseases. In such applications, it is important to identify families that are segregating the rare variants of interest. For rare diseases or rare familial forms of common diseases, pedigrees with multiple affected members are clearly harbouring risk variants. For more common diseases, however, it may be unclear whether a family with a few affected members is segregating a familial disease, is the result of multiple sporadic cases, or is a mixture of familial cases and phenocopies. We provide calculations for the probability that a family is harbouring familial disease, presented in general terms that admit working guidelines for selecting families for current sequencing studies. Using examples motivated by our own studies of thyroid cancer and published studies of colorectal cancer, we show that for common diseases, families with exactly two affected first‐degree relatives have only a moderate probability of segregating familial disease, but this probability is higher for families with three or more affected relatives, and those families should therefore be prioritised in sequencing studies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-10-23 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5813157/ /pubmed/29058319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ahg.12222 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Annals of Human Genetics published by University College London (UCL) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Communications Dudbridge, Frank Brown, Suzanne J. Ward, Lynley Wilson, Scott G. Walsh, John P. How many cases of disease in a pedigree imply familial disease? |
title | How many cases of disease in a pedigree imply familial disease? |
title_full | How many cases of disease in a pedigree imply familial disease? |
title_fullStr | How many cases of disease in a pedigree imply familial disease? |
title_full_unstemmed | How many cases of disease in a pedigree imply familial disease? |
title_short | How many cases of disease in a pedigree imply familial disease? |
title_sort | how many cases of disease in a pedigree imply familial disease? |
topic | Short Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29058319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ahg.12222 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dudbridgefrank howmanycasesofdiseaseinapedigreeimplyfamilialdisease AT brownsuzannej howmanycasesofdiseaseinapedigreeimplyfamilialdisease AT wardlynley howmanycasesofdiseaseinapedigreeimplyfamilialdisease AT wilsonscottg howmanycasesofdiseaseinapedigreeimplyfamilialdisease AT walshjohnp howmanycasesofdiseaseinapedigreeimplyfamilialdisease |