Cargando…
The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience
Many studies have now consistently reported that the phase angle of ongoing oscillatory activity (measured using EEG/MEG), at time of stimulus presentation influences detection when stimuli are near-threshold. However, studies examining whether the adjustment of the phase angle of oscillations is un...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20423-z |
_version_ | 1783300141308968960 |
---|---|
author | van Diepen, Rosanne Maria Mazaheri, Ali |
author_facet | van Diepen, Rosanne Maria Mazaheri, Ali |
author_sort | van Diepen, Rosanne Maria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many studies have now consistently reported that the phase angle of ongoing oscillatory activity (measured using EEG/MEG), at time of stimulus presentation influences detection when stimuli are near-threshold. However, studies examining whether the adjustment of the phase angle of oscillations is under top-down attentional control have thus far yielded conflicting results. A possible source for the discrepancy could be that the estimation of the phase of ongoing oscillations as well as its uniformity across trials could be affected by task induced changes in the power of oscillations or concurrent evoked responses. One measure, Inter-Trial Phase-Locking (ITPC), or the uniformity of phase angles across trials, is particularly vulnerable to these factors. Here, using various simulations modelling the common task induced changes in the EEG reported in the literature, we demonstrate that apparent changes in Inter-Trial Phase-Locking of oscillatory activity can occur independent of any actual change in the phase of the ongoing activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5813180 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58131802018-02-21 The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience van Diepen, Rosanne Maria Mazaheri, Ali Sci Rep Article Many studies have now consistently reported that the phase angle of ongoing oscillatory activity (measured using EEG/MEG), at time of stimulus presentation influences detection when stimuli are near-threshold. However, studies examining whether the adjustment of the phase angle of oscillations is under top-down attentional control have thus far yielded conflicting results. A possible source for the discrepancy could be that the estimation of the phase of ongoing oscillations as well as its uniformity across trials could be affected by task induced changes in the power of oscillations or concurrent evoked responses. One measure, Inter-Trial Phase-Locking (ITPC), or the uniformity of phase angles across trials, is particularly vulnerable to these factors. Here, using various simulations modelling the common task induced changes in the EEG reported in the literature, we demonstrate that apparent changes in Inter-Trial Phase-Locking of oscillatory activity can occur independent of any actual change in the phase of the ongoing activity. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5813180/ /pubmed/29445210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20423-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article van Diepen, Rosanne Maria Mazaheri, Ali The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience |
title | The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience |
title_full | The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience |
title_fullStr | The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience |
title_full_unstemmed | The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience |
title_short | The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience |
title_sort | caveats of observing inter-trial phase-coherence in cognitive neuroscience |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813180/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20423-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandiepenrosannemaria thecaveatsofobservingintertrialphasecoherenceincognitiveneuroscience AT mazaheriali thecaveatsofobservingintertrialphasecoherenceincognitiveneuroscience AT vandiepenrosannemaria caveatsofobservingintertrialphasecoherenceincognitiveneuroscience AT mazaheriali caveatsofobservingintertrialphasecoherenceincognitiveneuroscience |