Cargando…

The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience

Many studies have now consistently reported that the phase angle of ongoing oscillatory activity (measured using EEG/MEG), at time of stimulus presentation influences detection when stimuli are near-threshold. However, studies examining whether the adjustment of the phase angle of oscillations is un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Diepen, Rosanne Maria, Mazaheri, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20423-z
_version_ 1783300141308968960
author van Diepen, Rosanne Maria
Mazaheri, Ali
author_facet van Diepen, Rosanne Maria
Mazaheri, Ali
author_sort van Diepen, Rosanne Maria
collection PubMed
description Many studies have now consistently reported that the phase angle of ongoing oscillatory activity (measured using EEG/MEG), at time of stimulus presentation influences detection when stimuli are near-threshold. However, studies examining whether the adjustment of the phase angle of oscillations is under top-down attentional control have thus far yielded conflicting results. A possible source for the discrepancy could be that the estimation of the phase of ongoing oscillations as well as its uniformity across trials could be affected by task induced changes in the power of oscillations or concurrent evoked responses. One measure, Inter-Trial Phase-Locking (ITPC), or the uniformity of phase angles across trials, is particularly vulnerable to these factors. Here, using various simulations modelling the common task induced changes in the EEG reported in the literature, we demonstrate that apparent changes in Inter-Trial Phase-Locking of oscillatory activity can occur independent of any actual change in the phase of the ongoing activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5813180
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58131802018-02-21 The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience van Diepen, Rosanne Maria Mazaheri, Ali Sci Rep Article Many studies have now consistently reported that the phase angle of ongoing oscillatory activity (measured using EEG/MEG), at time of stimulus presentation influences detection when stimuli are near-threshold. However, studies examining whether the adjustment of the phase angle of oscillations is under top-down attentional control have thus far yielded conflicting results. A possible source for the discrepancy could be that the estimation of the phase of ongoing oscillations as well as its uniformity across trials could be affected by task induced changes in the power of oscillations or concurrent evoked responses. One measure, Inter-Trial Phase-Locking (ITPC), or the uniformity of phase angles across trials, is particularly vulnerable to these factors. Here, using various simulations modelling the common task induced changes in the EEG reported in the literature, we demonstrate that apparent changes in Inter-Trial Phase-Locking of oscillatory activity can occur independent of any actual change in the phase of the ongoing activity. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5813180/ /pubmed/29445210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20423-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
van Diepen, Rosanne Maria
Mazaheri, Ali
The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience
title The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience
title_full The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience
title_fullStr The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience
title_full_unstemmed The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience
title_short The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience
title_sort caveats of observing inter-trial phase-coherence in cognitive neuroscience
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813180/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20423-z
work_keys_str_mv AT vandiepenrosannemaria thecaveatsofobservingintertrialphasecoherenceincognitiveneuroscience
AT mazaheriali thecaveatsofobservingintertrialphasecoherenceincognitiveneuroscience
AT vandiepenrosannemaria caveatsofobservingintertrialphasecoherenceincognitiveneuroscience
AT mazaheriali caveatsofobservingintertrialphasecoherenceincognitiveneuroscience