Cargando…

Development and validation of prognostic survival models in newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop valid prognostic models to predict mortality, dependency, and “death or dependency” for use in newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: The models were developed in the Parkinsonism Incidence in North‐East Scotland study (UK, 198 p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macleod, Angus D., Dalen, Ingvild, Tysnes, Ole‐Bjørn, Larsen, Jan Petter, Counsell, Carl E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28976022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.27177
_version_ 1783300146091524096
author Macleod, Angus D.
Dalen, Ingvild
Tysnes, Ole‐Bjørn
Larsen, Jan Petter
Counsell, Carl E.
author_facet Macleod, Angus D.
Dalen, Ingvild
Tysnes, Ole‐Bjørn
Larsen, Jan Petter
Counsell, Carl E.
author_sort Macleod, Angus D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop valid prognostic models to predict mortality, dependency, and “death or dependency” for use in newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: The models were developed in the Parkinsonism Incidence in North‐East Scotland study (UK, 198 patients) and validated in the ParkWest study (Norway, 192 patients), cohorts that attempted to identify and follow‐up all new PD cases in the study area. Dependency was defined using the Schwab & England scale. We selected variables measured at time of diagnosis to include in the models. Internal validation and external validation were performed by calculating C‐statistics (discrimination) and plotting observed versus predicted risk in quantiles of predicted risk (calibration). RESULTS: Older age, male sex, increased severity of axial features, and Charlson comorbidity index were independent prognostic factors in the mortality model. Increasing age, higher smoking history, increased severity of axial features, and lower MMSE score were independent predictors in the models of dependency and “death or dependency.” Each model had very good internal calibration and very good or good discrimination (internal and external C‐statistics for the models were 0.73–0.75 and 0.68–0.78, respectively). Although each model clearly separated patients into groups according to risk, they tended to overestimate risk in ParkWest. The models were recalibrated to the baseline risk in the ParkWest study and then calibrated well in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed prognostic models for predicting medium‐term risk of important clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed PD. These models have validity for use for stratification of randomization, confounder adjustment, and case‐mix correction, but they are inadequate for individualized prognostication. © 2017. The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5813201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58132012018-02-21 Development and validation of prognostic survival models in newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease Macleod, Angus D. Dalen, Ingvild Tysnes, Ole‐Bjørn Larsen, Jan Petter Counsell, Carl E. Mov Disord Research Articles OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop valid prognostic models to predict mortality, dependency, and “death or dependency” for use in newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: The models were developed in the Parkinsonism Incidence in North‐East Scotland study (UK, 198 patients) and validated in the ParkWest study (Norway, 192 patients), cohorts that attempted to identify and follow‐up all new PD cases in the study area. Dependency was defined using the Schwab & England scale. We selected variables measured at time of diagnosis to include in the models. Internal validation and external validation were performed by calculating C‐statistics (discrimination) and plotting observed versus predicted risk in quantiles of predicted risk (calibration). RESULTS: Older age, male sex, increased severity of axial features, and Charlson comorbidity index were independent prognostic factors in the mortality model. Increasing age, higher smoking history, increased severity of axial features, and lower MMSE score were independent predictors in the models of dependency and “death or dependency.” Each model had very good internal calibration and very good or good discrimination (internal and external C‐statistics for the models were 0.73–0.75 and 0.68–0.78, respectively). Although each model clearly separated patients into groups according to risk, they tended to overestimate risk in ParkWest. The models were recalibrated to the baseline risk in the ParkWest study and then calibrated well in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed prognostic models for predicting medium‐term risk of important clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed PD. These models have validity for use for stratification of randomization, confounder adjustment, and case‐mix correction, but they are inadequate for individualized prognostication. © 2017. The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-10-04 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5813201/ /pubmed/28976022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.27177 Text en © 2017. The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Macleod, Angus D.
Dalen, Ingvild
Tysnes, Ole‐Bjørn
Larsen, Jan Petter
Counsell, Carl E.
Development and validation of prognostic survival models in newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease
title Development and validation of prognostic survival models in newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease
title_full Development and validation of prognostic survival models in newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease
title_fullStr Development and validation of prognostic survival models in newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of prognostic survival models in newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease
title_short Development and validation of prognostic survival models in newly diagnosed Parkinson's disease
title_sort development and validation of prognostic survival models in newly diagnosed parkinson's disease
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28976022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.27177
work_keys_str_mv AT macleodangusd developmentandvalidationofprognosticsurvivalmodelsinnewlydiagnosedparkinsonsdisease
AT daleningvild developmentandvalidationofprognosticsurvivalmodelsinnewlydiagnosedparkinsonsdisease
AT tysnesolebjørn developmentandvalidationofprognosticsurvivalmodelsinnewlydiagnosedparkinsonsdisease
AT larsenjanpetter developmentandvalidationofprognosticsurvivalmodelsinnewlydiagnosedparkinsonsdisease
AT counsellcarle developmentandvalidationofprognosticsurvivalmodelsinnewlydiagnosedparkinsonsdisease