Cargando…

Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing

BACKGROUND. Using next‐generation sequencing (NGS) to guide cancer therapy has created challenges in analyzing and reporting large volumes of genomic data to patients and caregivers. Specifically, providing current, accurate information on newly approved therapies and open clinical trials requires c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Nirali M., Michelini, Vanessa V., Snell, Jeff M., Balu, Saianand, Hoyle, Alan P., Parker, Joel S., Hayward, Michele C., Eberhard, David A., Salazar, Ashley H., McNeillie, Patrick, Xu, Jia, Huettner, Claudia S., Koyama, Takahiko, Utro, Filippo, Rhrissorrakrai, Kahn, Norel, Raquel, Bilal, Erhan, Royyuru, Ajay, Parida, Laxmi, Earp, H. Shelton, Grilley‐Olson, Juneko E., Hayes, D. Neil, Harvey, Stephen J., Sharpless, Norman E., Kim, William Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AlphaMed Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29158372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0170
_version_ 1783300229996478464
author Patel, Nirali M.
Michelini, Vanessa V.
Snell, Jeff M.
Balu, Saianand
Hoyle, Alan P.
Parker, Joel S.
Hayward, Michele C.
Eberhard, David A.
Salazar, Ashley H.
McNeillie, Patrick
Xu, Jia
Huettner, Claudia S.
Koyama, Takahiko
Utro, Filippo
Rhrissorrakrai, Kahn
Norel, Raquel
Bilal, Erhan
Royyuru, Ajay
Parida, Laxmi
Earp, H. Shelton
Grilley‐Olson, Juneko E.
Hayes, D. Neil
Harvey, Stephen J.
Sharpless, Norman E.
Kim, William Y.
author_facet Patel, Nirali M.
Michelini, Vanessa V.
Snell, Jeff M.
Balu, Saianand
Hoyle, Alan P.
Parker, Joel S.
Hayward, Michele C.
Eberhard, David A.
Salazar, Ashley H.
McNeillie, Patrick
Xu, Jia
Huettner, Claudia S.
Koyama, Takahiko
Utro, Filippo
Rhrissorrakrai, Kahn
Norel, Raquel
Bilal, Erhan
Royyuru, Ajay
Parida, Laxmi
Earp, H. Shelton
Grilley‐Olson, Juneko E.
Hayes, D. Neil
Harvey, Stephen J.
Sharpless, Norman E.
Kim, William Y.
author_sort Patel, Nirali M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. Using next‐generation sequencing (NGS) to guide cancer therapy has created challenges in analyzing and reporting large volumes of genomic data to patients and caregivers. Specifically, providing current, accurate information on newly approved therapies and open clinical trials requires considerable manual curation performed mainly by human “molecular tumor boards” (MTBs). The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of cognitive computing as performed by Watson for Genomics (WfG) compared with a human MTB. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One thousand eighteen patient cases that previously underwent targeted exon sequencing at the University of North Carolina (UNC) and subsequent analysis by the UNCseq informatics pipeline and the UNC MTB between November 7, 2011, and May 12, 2015, were analyzed with WfG, a cognitive computing technology for genomic analysis. RESULTS. Using a WfG‐curated actionable gene list, we identified additional genomic events of potential significance (not discovered by traditional MTB curation) in 323 (32%) patients. The majority of these additional genomic events were considered actionable based upon their ability to qualify patients for biomarker‐selected clinical trials. Indeed, the opening of a relevant clinical trial within 1 month prior to WfG analysis provided the rationale for identification of a new actionable event in nearly a quarter of the 323 patients. This automated analysis took <3 minutes per case. CONCLUSION. These results demonstrate that the interpretation and actionability of somatic NGS results are evolving too rapidly to rely solely on human curation. Molecular tumor boards empowered by cognitive computing could potentially improve patient care by providing a rapid, comprehensive approach for data analysis and consideration of up‐to‐date availability of clinical trials. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. The results of this study demonstrate that the interpretation and actionability of somatic next‐generation sequencing results are evolving too rapidly to rely solely on human curation. Molecular tumor boards empowered by cognitive computing can significantly improve patient care by providing a fast, cost‐effective, and comprehensive approach for data analysis in the delivery of precision medicine. Patients and physicians who are considering enrollment in clinical trials may benefit from the support of such tools applied to genomic data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5813753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AlphaMed Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58137532018-08-01 Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing Patel, Nirali M. Michelini, Vanessa V. Snell, Jeff M. Balu, Saianand Hoyle, Alan P. Parker, Joel S. Hayward, Michele C. Eberhard, David A. Salazar, Ashley H. McNeillie, Patrick Xu, Jia Huettner, Claudia S. Koyama, Takahiko Utro, Filippo Rhrissorrakrai, Kahn Norel, Raquel Bilal, Erhan Royyuru, Ajay Parida, Laxmi Earp, H. Shelton Grilley‐Olson, Juneko E. Hayes, D. Neil Harvey, Stephen J. Sharpless, Norman E. Kim, William Y. Oncologist Cancer Diagnostics and Molecular Pathology BACKGROUND. Using next‐generation sequencing (NGS) to guide cancer therapy has created challenges in analyzing and reporting large volumes of genomic data to patients and caregivers. Specifically, providing current, accurate information on newly approved therapies and open clinical trials requires considerable manual curation performed mainly by human “molecular tumor boards” (MTBs). The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of cognitive computing as performed by Watson for Genomics (WfG) compared with a human MTB. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One thousand eighteen patient cases that previously underwent targeted exon sequencing at the University of North Carolina (UNC) and subsequent analysis by the UNCseq informatics pipeline and the UNC MTB between November 7, 2011, and May 12, 2015, were analyzed with WfG, a cognitive computing technology for genomic analysis. RESULTS. Using a WfG‐curated actionable gene list, we identified additional genomic events of potential significance (not discovered by traditional MTB curation) in 323 (32%) patients. The majority of these additional genomic events were considered actionable based upon their ability to qualify patients for biomarker‐selected clinical trials. Indeed, the opening of a relevant clinical trial within 1 month prior to WfG analysis provided the rationale for identification of a new actionable event in nearly a quarter of the 323 patients. This automated analysis took <3 minutes per case. CONCLUSION. These results demonstrate that the interpretation and actionability of somatic NGS results are evolving too rapidly to rely solely on human curation. Molecular tumor boards empowered by cognitive computing could potentially improve patient care by providing a rapid, comprehensive approach for data analysis and consideration of up‐to‐date availability of clinical trials. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. The results of this study demonstrate that the interpretation and actionability of somatic next‐generation sequencing results are evolving too rapidly to rely solely on human curation. Molecular tumor boards empowered by cognitive computing can significantly improve patient care by providing a fast, cost‐effective, and comprehensive approach for data analysis in the delivery of precision medicine. Patients and physicians who are considering enrollment in clinical trials may benefit from the support of such tools applied to genomic data. AlphaMed Press 2017-11-20 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5813753/ /pubmed/29158372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0170 Text en © AlphaMed Press 2017
spellingShingle Cancer Diagnostics and Molecular Pathology
Patel, Nirali M.
Michelini, Vanessa V.
Snell, Jeff M.
Balu, Saianand
Hoyle, Alan P.
Parker, Joel S.
Hayward, Michele C.
Eberhard, David A.
Salazar, Ashley H.
McNeillie, Patrick
Xu, Jia
Huettner, Claudia S.
Koyama, Takahiko
Utro, Filippo
Rhrissorrakrai, Kahn
Norel, Raquel
Bilal, Erhan
Royyuru, Ajay
Parida, Laxmi
Earp, H. Shelton
Grilley‐Olson, Juneko E.
Hayes, D. Neil
Harvey, Stephen J.
Sharpless, Norman E.
Kim, William Y.
Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing
title Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing
title_full Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing
title_fullStr Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing
title_short Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing
title_sort enhancing next‐generation sequencing‐guided cancer care through cognitive computing
topic Cancer Diagnostics and Molecular Pathology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29158372
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0170
work_keys_str_mv AT patelniralim enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT michelinivanessav enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT snelljeffm enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT balusaianand enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT hoylealanp enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT parkerjoels enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT haywardmichelec enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT eberharddavida enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT salazarashleyh enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT mcneilliepatrick enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT xujia enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT huettnerclaudias enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT koyamatakahiko enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT utrofilippo enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT rhrissorrakraikahn enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT norelraquel enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT bilalerhan enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT royyuruajay enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT paridalaxmi enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT earphshelton enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT grilleyolsonjunekoe enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT hayesdneil enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT harveystephenj enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT sharplessnormane enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing
AT kimwilliamy enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing