Cargando…
Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing
BACKGROUND. Using next‐generation sequencing (NGS) to guide cancer therapy has created challenges in analyzing and reporting large volumes of genomic data to patients and caregivers. Specifically, providing current, accurate information on newly approved therapies and open clinical trials requires c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AlphaMed Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29158372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0170 |
_version_ | 1783300229996478464 |
---|---|
author | Patel, Nirali M. Michelini, Vanessa V. Snell, Jeff M. Balu, Saianand Hoyle, Alan P. Parker, Joel S. Hayward, Michele C. Eberhard, David A. Salazar, Ashley H. McNeillie, Patrick Xu, Jia Huettner, Claudia S. Koyama, Takahiko Utro, Filippo Rhrissorrakrai, Kahn Norel, Raquel Bilal, Erhan Royyuru, Ajay Parida, Laxmi Earp, H. Shelton Grilley‐Olson, Juneko E. Hayes, D. Neil Harvey, Stephen J. Sharpless, Norman E. Kim, William Y. |
author_facet | Patel, Nirali M. Michelini, Vanessa V. Snell, Jeff M. Balu, Saianand Hoyle, Alan P. Parker, Joel S. Hayward, Michele C. Eberhard, David A. Salazar, Ashley H. McNeillie, Patrick Xu, Jia Huettner, Claudia S. Koyama, Takahiko Utro, Filippo Rhrissorrakrai, Kahn Norel, Raquel Bilal, Erhan Royyuru, Ajay Parida, Laxmi Earp, H. Shelton Grilley‐Olson, Juneko E. Hayes, D. Neil Harvey, Stephen J. Sharpless, Norman E. Kim, William Y. |
author_sort | Patel, Nirali M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND. Using next‐generation sequencing (NGS) to guide cancer therapy has created challenges in analyzing and reporting large volumes of genomic data to patients and caregivers. Specifically, providing current, accurate information on newly approved therapies and open clinical trials requires considerable manual curation performed mainly by human “molecular tumor boards” (MTBs). The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of cognitive computing as performed by Watson for Genomics (WfG) compared with a human MTB. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One thousand eighteen patient cases that previously underwent targeted exon sequencing at the University of North Carolina (UNC) and subsequent analysis by the UNCseq informatics pipeline and the UNC MTB between November 7, 2011, and May 12, 2015, were analyzed with WfG, a cognitive computing technology for genomic analysis. RESULTS. Using a WfG‐curated actionable gene list, we identified additional genomic events of potential significance (not discovered by traditional MTB curation) in 323 (32%) patients. The majority of these additional genomic events were considered actionable based upon their ability to qualify patients for biomarker‐selected clinical trials. Indeed, the opening of a relevant clinical trial within 1 month prior to WfG analysis provided the rationale for identification of a new actionable event in nearly a quarter of the 323 patients. This automated analysis took <3 minutes per case. CONCLUSION. These results demonstrate that the interpretation and actionability of somatic NGS results are evolving too rapidly to rely solely on human curation. Molecular tumor boards empowered by cognitive computing could potentially improve patient care by providing a rapid, comprehensive approach for data analysis and consideration of up‐to‐date availability of clinical trials. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. The results of this study demonstrate that the interpretation and actionability of somatic next‐generation sequencing results are evolving too rapidly to rely solely on human curation. Molecular tumor boards empowered by cognitive computing can significantly improve patient care by providing a fast, cost‐effective, and comprehensive approach for data analysis in the delivery of precision medicine. Patients and physicians who are considering enrollment in clinical trials may benefit from the support of such tools applied to genomic data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5813753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | AlphaMed Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58137532018-08-01 Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing Patel, Nirali M. Michelini, Vanessa V. Snell, Jeff M. Balu, Saianand Hoyle, Alan P. Parker, Joel S. Hayward, Michele C. Eberhard, David A. Salazar, Ashley H. McNeillie, Patrick Xu, Jia Huettner, Claudia S. Koyama, Takahiko Utro, Filippo Rhrissorrakrai, Kahn Norel, Raquel Bilal, Erhan Royyuru, Ajay Parida, Laxmi Earp, H. Shelton Grilley‐Olson, Juneko E. Hayes, D. Neil Harvey, Stephen J. Sharpless, Norman E. Kim, William Y. Oncologist Cancer Diagnostics and Molecular Pathology BACKGROUND. Using next‐generation sequencing (NGS) to guide cancer therapy has created challenges in analyzing and reporting large volumes of genomic data to patients and caregivers. Specifically, providing current, accurate information on newly approved therapies and open clinical trials requires considerable manual curation performed mainly by human “molecular tumor boards” (MTBs). The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of cognitive computing as performed by Watson for Genomics (WfG) compared with a human MTB. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One thousand eighteen patient cases that previously underwent targeted exon sequencing at the University of North Carolina (UNC) and subsequent analysis by the UNCseq informatics pipeline and the UNC MTB between November 7, 2011, and May 12, 2015, were analyzed with WfG, a cognitive computing technology for genomic analysis. RESULTS. Using a WfG‐curated actionable gene list, we identified additional genomic events of potential significance (not discovered by traditional MTB curation) in 323 (32%) patients. The majority of these additional genomic events were considered actionable based upon their ability to qualify patients for biomarker‐selected clinical trials. Indeed, the opening of a relevant clinical trial within 1 month prior to WfG analysis provided the rationale for identification of a new actionable event in nearly a quarter of the 323 patients. This automated analysis took <3 minutes per case. CONCLUSION. These results demonstrate that the interpretation and actionability of somatic NGS results are evolving too rapidly to rely solely on human curation. Molecular tumor boards empowered by cognitive computing could potentially improve patient care by providing a rapid, comprehensive approach for data analysis and consideration of up‐to‐date availability of clinical trials. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. The results of this study demonstrate that the interpretation and actionability of somatic next‐generation sequencing results are evolving too rapidly to rely solely on human curation. Molecular tumor boards empowered by cognitive computing can significantly improve patient care by providing a fast, cost‐effective, and comprehensive approach for data analysis in the delivery of precision medicine. Patients and physicians who are considering enrollment in clinical trials may benefit from the support of such tools applied to genomic data. AlphaMed Press 2017-11-20 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5813753/ /pubmed/29158372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0170 Text en © AlphaMed Press 2017 |
spellingShingle | Cancer Diagnostics and Molecular Pathology Patel, Nirali M. Michelini, Vanessa V. Snell, Jeff M. Balu, Saianand Hoyle, Alan P. Parker, Joel S. Hayward, Michele C. Eberhard, David A. Salazar, Ashley H. McNeillie, Patrick Xu, Jia Huettner, Claudia S. Koyama, Takahiko Utro, Filippo Rhrissorrakrai, Kahn Norel, Raquel Bilal, Erhan Royyuru, Ajay Parida, Laxmi Earp, H. Shelton Grilley‐Olson, Juneko E. Hayes, D. Neil Harvey, Stephen J. Sharpless, Norman E. Kim, William Y. Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing |
title | Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing |
title_full | Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing |
title_fullStr | Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing |
title_short | Enhancing Next‐Generation Sequencing‐Guided Cancer Care Through Cognitive Computing |
title_sort | enhancing next‐generation sequencing‐guided cancer care through cognitive computing |
topic | Cancer Diagnostics and Molecular Pathology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29158372 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patelniralim enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT michelinivanessav enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT snelljeffm enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT balusaianand enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT hoylealanp enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT parkerjoels enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT haywardmichelec enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT eberharddavida enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT salazarashleyh enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT mcneilliepatrick enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT xujia enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT huettnerclaudias enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT koyamatakahiko enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT utrofilippo enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT rhrissorrakraikahn enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT norelraquel enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT bilalerhan enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT royyuruajay enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT paridalaxmi enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT earphshelton enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT grilleyolsonjunekoe enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT hayesdneil enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT harveystephenj enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT sharplessnormane enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing AT kimwilliamy enhancingnextgenerationsequencingguidedcancercarethroughcognitivecomputing |