Cargando…

Comparing deep learning and concept extraction based methods for patient phenotyping from clinical narratives

In secondary analysis of electronic health records, a crucial task consists in correctly identifying the patient cohort under investigation. In many cases, the most valuable and relevant information for an accurate classification of medical conditions exist only in clinical narratives. Therefore, it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gehrmann, Sebastian, Dernoncourt, Franck, Li, Yeran, Carlson, Eric T., Wu, Joy T., Welt, Jonathan, Foote, John, Moseley, Edward T., Grant, David W., Tyler, Patrick D., Celi, Leo A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29447188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192360
_version_ 1783300250375553024
author Gehrmann, Sebastian
Dernoncourt, Franck
Li, Yeran
Carlson, Eric T.
Wu, Joy T.
Welt, Jonathan
Foote, John
Moseley, Edward T.
Grant, David W.
Tyler, Patrick D.
Celi, Leo A.
author_facet Gehrmann, Sebastian
Dernoncourt, Franck
Li, Yeran
Carlson, Eric T.
Wu, Joy T.
Welt, Jonathan
Foote, John
Moseley, Edward T.
Grant, David W.
Tyler, Patrick D.
Celi, Leo A.
author_sort Gehrmann, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description In secondary analysis of electronic health records, a crucial task consists in correctly identifying the patient cohort under investigation. In many cases, the most valuable and relevant information for an accurate classification of medical conditions exist only in clinical narratives. Therefore, it is necessary to use natural language processing (NLP) techniques to extract and evaluate these narratives. The most commonly used approach to this problem relies on extracting a number of clinician-defined medical concepts from text and using machine learning techniques to identify whether a particular patient has a certain condition. However, recent advances in deep learning and NLP enable models to learn a rich representation of (medical) language. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) for text classification can augment the existing techniques by leveraging the representation of language to learn which phrases in a text are relevant for a given medical condition. In this work, we compare concept extraction based methods with CNNs and other commonly used models in NLP in ten phenotyping tasks using 1,610 discharge summaries from the MIMIC-III database. We show that CNNs outperform concept extraction based methods in almost all of the tasks, with an improvement in F1-score of up to 26 and up to 7 percentage points in area under the ROC curve (AUC). We additionally assess the interpretability of both approaches by presenting and evaluating methods that calculate and extract the most salient phrases for a prediction. The results indicate that CNNs are a valid alternative to existing approaches in patient phenotyping and cohort identification, and should be further investigated. Moreover, the deep learning approach presented in this paper can be used to assist clinicians during chart review or support the extraction of billing codes from text by identifying and highlighting relevant phrases for various medical conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5813927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58139272018-03-02 Comparing deep learning and concept extraction based methods for patient phenotyping from clinical narratives Gehrmann, Sebastian Dernoncourt, Franck Li, Yeran Carlson, Eric T. Wu, Joy T. Welt, Jonathan Foote, John Moseley, Edward T. Grant, David W. Tyler, Patrick D. Celi, Leo A. PLoS One Research Article In secondary analysis of electronic health records, a crucial task consists in correctly identifying the patient cohort under investigation. In many cases, the most valuable and relevant information for an accurate classification of medical conditions exist only in clinical narratives. Therefore, it is necessary to use natural language processing (NLP) techniques to extract and evaluate these narratives. The most commonly used approach to this problem relies on extracting a number of clinician-defined medical concepts from text and using machine learning techniques to identify whether a particular patient has a certain condition. However, recent advances in deep learning and NLP enable models to learn a rich representation of (medical) language. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) for text classification can augment the existing techniques by leveraging the representation of language to learn which phrases in a text are relevant for a given medical condition. In this work, we compare concept extraction based methods with CNNs and other commonly used models in NLP in ten phenotyping tasks using 1,610 discharge summaries from the MIMIC-III database. We show that CNNs outperform concept extraction based methods in almost all of the tasks, with an improvement in F1-score of up to 26 and up to 7 percentage points in area under the ROC curve (AUC). We additionally assess the interpretability of both approaches by presenting and evaluating methods that calculate and extract the most salient phrases for a prediction. The results indicate that CNNs are a valid alternative to existing approaches in patient phenotyping and cohort identification, and should be further investigated. Moreover, the deep learning approach presented in this paper can be used to assist clinicians during chart review or support the extraction of billing codes from text by identifying and highlighting relevant phrases for various medical conditions. Public Library of Science 2018-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5813927/ /pubmed/29447188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192360 Text en © 2018 Gehrmann et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gehrmann, Sebastian
Dernoncourt, Franck
Li, Yeran
Carlson, Eric T.
Wu, Joy T.
Welt, Jonathan
Foote, John
Moseley, Edward T.
Grant, David W.
Tyler, Patrick D.
Celi, Leo A.
Comparing deep learning and concept extraction based methods for patient phenotyping from clinical narratives
title Comparing deep learning and concept extraction based methods for patient phenotyping from clinical narratives
title_full Comparing deep learning and concept extraction based methods for patient phenotyping from clinical narratives
title_fullStr Comparing deep learning and concept extraction based methods for patient phenotyping from clinical narratives
title_full_unstemmed Comparing deep learning and concept extraction based methods for patient phenotyping from clinical narratives
title_short Comparing deep learning and concept extraction based methods for patient phenotyping from clinical narratives
title_sort comparing deep learning and concept extraction based methods for patient phenotyping from clinical narratives
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29447188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192360
work_keys_str_mv AT gehrmannsebastian comparingdeeplearningandconceptextractionbasedmethodsforpatientphenotypingfromclinicalnarratives
AT dernoncourtfranck comparingdeeplearningandconceptextractionbasedmethodsforpatientphenotypingfromclinicalnarratives
AT liyeran comparingdeeplearningandconceptextractionbasedmethodsforpatientphenotypingfromclinicalnarratives
AT carlsonerict comparingdeeplearningandconceptextractionbasedmethodsforpatientphenotypingfromclinicalnarratives
AT wujoyt comparingdeeplearningandconceptextractionbasedmethodsforpatientphenotypingfromclinicalnarratives
AT weltjonathan comparingdeeplearningandconceptextractionbasedmethodsforpatientphenotypingfromclinicalnarratives
AT footejohn comparingdeeplearningandconceptextractionbasedmethodsforpatientphenotypingfromclinicalnarratives
AT moseleyedwardt comparingdeeplearningandconceptextractionbasedmethodsforpatientphenotypingfromclinicalnarratives
AT grantdavidw comparingdeeplearningandconceptextractionbasedmethodsforpatientphenotypingfromclinicalnarratives
AT tylerpatrickd comparingdeeplearningandconceptextractionbasedmethodsforpatientphenotypingfromclinicalnarratives
AT celileoa comparingdeeplearningandconceptextractionbasedmethodsforpatientphenotypingfromclinicalnarratives