Cargando…
The quality of instruments to assess the process of shared decision making: A systematic review
OBJECTIVE: To inventory instruments assessing the process of shared decision making and appraise their measurement quality, taking into account the methodological quality of their validation studies. METHODS: In a systematic review we searched seven databases (PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane, PsycI...
Autores principales: | Gärtner, Fania R., Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna, Smith, Ian P., Scholl, Isabelle, Stiggelbout, Anne M., Pieterse, Arwen H. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5813932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29447193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191747 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review
por: Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Do Shared Decision-Making Measures Reflect Key Elements of Shared Decision Making? A Content Review of Coding Schemes
por: Kunneman, Marleen, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Measuring shared decision making in oncology: Development and first testing of the iSHAREpatient and iSHAREphysician questionnaires
por: Bomhof‐Roordink, Hanna, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Is There a Relationship between Shared Decision Making and Breast Cancer Patients’ Trust in Their Medical Oncologists?
por: Engelhardt, Ellen G., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Dutch Translation and Psychometric Testing of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in Primary and Secondary Care
por: Rodenburg-Vandenbussche, Sumayah, et al.
Publicado: (2015)