Cargando…

Medical professionalism of foreign-born and foreign-trained physicians under close scrutiny: A qualitative study with stakeholders in Germany

Hospitals in Germany employ increasing numbers of foreign-born and foreign-trained (FB&FT) physicians. Studies have investigated how FB&FT physicians experience their professional integration into the German healthcare system, however, the perspectives of stakeholders working with and shapin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klingler, Corinna, Ismail, Fatiha, Marckmann, Georg, Kuehlmeyer, Katja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29447259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193010
_version_ 1783300270768259072
author Klingler, Corinna
Ismail, Fatiha
Marckmann, Georg
Kuehlmeyer, Katja
author_facet Klingler, Corinna
Ismail, Fatiha
Marckmann, Georg
Kuehlmeyer, Katja
author_sort Klingler, Corinna
collection PubMed
description Hospitals in Germany employ increasing numbers of foreign-born and foreign-trained (FB&FT) physicians. Studies have investigated how FB&FT physicians experience their professional integration into the German healthcare system, however, the perspectives of stakeholders working with and shaping the work experiences of FB&FT physicians in German hospitals have so far been neglected. This study explores relevant stakeholders’ opinions and attitudes towards FB&FT physicians—which likely influence how these physicians settle in—and how these opinions were formed. We conducted a qualitative interview study with 25 stakeholders working in hospitals or in health policy development. The interviews were analyzed within a constructivist research paradigm using methods derived from Grounded Theory (situational analysis as well as open, axial and selective coding). We found that stakeholders tended to focus on problems in FB&FT physicians’ work performance. Participants criticized FB&FT physicians’ work for deviating from presumably shared professional standards (skill or knowledge and behavioral standards). The professional standards invoked to justify problem-focused statements comprised the definition of an ideal behavior, attitude or ability and a tolerance range that was adapted in a dynamic process. Behavior falling outside the tolerance range was criticized as unacceptable, requiring action to prevent similar deviations in the future. Furthermore, we derived three strategies (minimization, homogenization and quality management) proposed by participants to manage deviations from assumed professional standards by FB&FT physicians. We critically reflect on the social processes of evaluation and problematization and question the legitimacy of professional standards invoked. We also discuss discriminatory tendencies visible in evaluative statements of some participants as well as in some of the strategies proposed. We suggest it will be key to develop and implement better support strategies for FB&FT physicians while also addressing problematic attitudes within the receiving system to further professional integration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5814013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58140132018-03-02 Medical professionalism of foreign-born and foreign-trained physicians under close scrutiny: A qualitative study with stakeholders in Germany Klingler, Corinna Ismail, Fatiha Marckmann, Georg Kuehlmeyer, Katja PLoS One Research Article Hospitals in Germany employ increasing numbers of foreign-born and foreign-trained (FB&FT) physicians. Studies have investigated how FB&FT physicians experience their professional integration into the German healthcare system, however, the perspectives of stakeholders working with and shaping the work experiences of FB&FT physicians in German hospitals have so far been neglected. This study explores relevant stakeholders’ opinions and attitudes towards FB&FT physicians—which likely influence how these physicians settle in—and how these opinions were formed. We conducted a qualitative interview study with 25 stakeholders working in hospitals or in health policy development. The interviews were analyzed within a constructivist research paradigm using methods derived from Grounded Theory (situational analysis as well as open, axial and selective coding). We found that stakeholders tended to focus on problems in FB&FT physicians’ work performance. Participants criticized FB&FT physicians’ work for deviating from presumably shared professional standards (skill or knowledge and behavioral standards). The professional standards invoked to justify problem-focused statements comprised the definition of an ideal behavior, attitude or ability and a tolerance range that was adapted in a dynamic process. Behavior falling outside the tolerance range was criticized as unacceptable, requiring action to prevent similar deviations in the future. Furthermore, we derived three strategies (minimization, homogenization and quality management) proposed by participants to manage deviations from assumed professional standards by FB&FT physicians. We critically reflect on the social processes of evaluation and problematization and question the legitimacy of professional standards invoked. We also discuss discriminatory tendencies visible in evaluative statements of some participants as well as in some of the strategies proposed. We suggest it will be key to develop and implement better support strategies for FB&FT physicians while also addressing problematic attitudes within the receiving system to further professional integration. Public Library of Science 2018-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5814013/ /pubmed/29447259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193010 Text en © 2018 Klingler et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Klingler, Corinna
Ismail, Fatiha
Marckmann, Georg
Kuehlmeyer, Katja
Medical professionalism of foreign-born and foreign-trained physicians under close scrutiny: A qualitative study with stakeholders in Germany
title Medical professionalism of foreign-born and foreign-trained physicians under close scrutiny: A qualitative study with stakeholders in Germany
title_full Medical professionalism of foreign-born and foreign-trained physicians under close scrutiny: A qualitative study with stakeholders in Germany
title_fullStr Medical professionalism of foreign-born and foreign-trained physicians under close scrutiny: A qualitative study with stakeholders in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Medical professionalism of foreign-born and foreign-trained physicians under close scrutiny: A qualitative study with stakeholders in Germany
title_short Medical professionalism of foreign-born and foreign-trained physicians under close scrutiny: A qualitative study with stakeholders in Germany
title_sort medical professionalism of foreign-born and foreign-trained physicians under close scrutiny: a qualitative study with stakeholders in germany
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29447259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193010
work_keys_str_mv AT klinglercorinna medicalprofessionalismofforeignbornandforeigntrainedphysiciansunderclosescrutinyaqualitativestudywithstakeholdersingermany
AT ismailfatiha medicalprofessionalismofforeignbornandforeigntrainedphysiciansunderclosescrutinyaqualitativestudywithstakeholdersingermany
AT marckmanngeorg medicalprofessionalismofforeignbornandforeigntrainedphysiciansunderclosescrutinyaqualitativestudywithstakeholdersingermany
AT kuehlmeyerkatja medicalprofessionalismofforeignbornandforeigntrainedphysiciansunderclosescrutinyaqualitativestudywithstakeholdersingermany