Cargando…
Assessing tumor molecular profiling to guide treatments for patients with advanced female genital tract malignancy
Tumor molecular profiling has enabled selection of targeted therapies in a host of solid tumors. Here we used a retrospective clinical cohort, to evaluate the benefit of tailoring treatments for female genital tract malignancy, using tumor molecular profiles. Clinical outcome data for 112 patients w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29464050 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23675 |
_version_ | 1783300298152869888 |
---|---|
author | Carter, Philip Alifrangis, Costi Cereser, Biancastella Chandrasinghe, Pramodh Del Bel Belluz, Lisa Fotopoulou, Christina Frilling, Andreja Herzog, Thomas Moderau, Nina Tabassum, Neha Krell, Jonathan Stebbing, Justin |
author_facet | Carter, Philip Alifrangis, Costi Cereser, Biancastella Chandrasinghe, Pramodh Del Bel Belluz, Lisa Fotopoulou, Christina Frilling, Andreja Herzog, Thomas Moderau, Nina Tabassum, Neha Krell, Jonathan Stebbing, Justin |
author_sort | Carter, Philip |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tumor molecular profiling has enabled selection of targeted therapies in a host of solid tumors. Here we used a retrospective clinical cohort, to evaluate the benefit of tailoring treatments for female genital tract malignancy, using tumor molecular profiles. Clinical outcome data for 112 patients was retrospectively separated into two groups. These either followed a matched treatment plan that incorporated at least one drug recommended according to their tumor profile and none that were expected to have no benefit (64 patients), or was unmatched with suggested treatments and received at least one drug that was anticipated to lack benefit for that tumor (48 patients). In the group of patients whose drugs matched those recommended by molecular profiling of their tumor, their overall survival was 593 days on average, compared to 449 days for patients that did not; removing drugs predicted to have no benefit from treatment regimens received after profiling increased survival by 144 days on average (P = 0.0265). In the matched treatment group, 30% of patients had died by the last time of monitoring, whereas this was 40% in the unmatched group (P = 0.2778). The IHC biomarker for the progesterone receptor was demonstrated to be prognostic for survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5814190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58141902018-02-20 Assessing tumor molecular profiling to guide treatments for patients with advanced female genital tract malignancy Carter, Philip Alifrangis, Costi Cereser, Biancastella Chandrasinghe, Pramodh Del Bel Belluz, Lisa Fotopoulou, Christina Frilling, Andreja Herzog, Thomas Moderau, Nina Tabassum, Neha Krell, Jonathan Stebbing, Justin Oncotarget Research Paper Tumor molecular profiling has enabled selection of targeted therapies in a host of solid tumors. Here we used a retrospective clinical cohort, to evaluate the benefit of tailoring treatments for female genital tract malignancy, using tumor molecular profiles. Clinical outcome data for 112 patients was retrospectively separated into two groups. These either followed a matched treatment plan that incorporated at least one drug recommended according to their tumor profile and none that were expected to have no benefit (64 patients), or was unmatched with suggested treatments and received at least one drug that was anticipated to lack benefit for that tumor (48 patients). In the group of patients whose drugs matched those recommended by molecular profiling of their tumor, their overall survival was 593 days on average, compared to 449 days for patients that did not; removing drugs predicted to have no benefit from treatment regimens received after profiling increased survival by 144 days on average (P = 0.0265). In the matched treatment group, 30% of patients had died by the last time of monitoring, whereas this was 40% in the unmatched group (P = 0.2778). The IHC biomarker for the progesterone receptor was demonstrated to be prognostic for survival. Impact Journals LLC 2017-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5814190/ /pubmed/29464050 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23675 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Carter et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Carter, Philip Alifrangis, Costi Cereser, Biancastella Chandrasinghe, Pramodh Del Bel Belluz, Lisa Fotopoulou, Christina Frilling, Andreja Herzog, Thomas Moderau, Nina Tabassum, Neha Krell, Jonathan Stebbing, Justin Assessing tumor molecular profiling to guide treatments for patients with advanced female genital tract malignancy |
title | Assessing tumor molecular profiling to guide treatments for patients with advanced female genital tract malignancy |
title_full | Assessing tumor molecular profiling to guide treatments for patients with advanced female genital tract malignancy |
title_fullStr | Assessing tumor molecular profiling to guide treatments for patients with advanced female genital tract malignancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing tumor molecular profiling to guide treatments for patients with advanced female genital tract malignancy |
title_short | Assessing tumor molecular profiling to guide treatments for patients with advanced female genital tract malignancy |
title_sort | assessing tumor molecular profiling to guide treatments for patients with advanced female genital tract malignancy |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29464050 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23675 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carterphilip assessingtumormolecularprofilingtoguidetreatmentsforpatientswithadvancedfemalegenitaltractmalignancy AT alifrangiscosti assessingtumormolecularprofilingtoguidetreatmentsforpatientswithadvancedfemalegenitaltractmalignancy AT cereserbiancastella assessingtumormolecularprofilingtoguidetreatmentsforpatientswithadvancedfemalegenitaltractmalignancy AT chandrasinghepramodh assessingtumormolecularprofilingtoguidetreatmentsforpatientswithadvancedfemalegenitaltractmalignancy AT delbelbelluzlisa assessingtumormolecularprofilingtoguidetreatmentsforpatientswithadvancedfemalegenitaltractmalignancy AT fotopoulouchristina assessingtumormolecularprofilingtoguidetreatmentsforpatientswithadvancedfemalegenitaltractmalignancy AT frillingandreja assessingtumormolecularprofilingtoguidetreatmentsforpatientswithadvancedfemalegenitaltractmalignancy AT herzogthomas assessingtumormolecularprofilingtoguidetreatmentsforpatientswithadvancedfemalegenitaltractmalignancy AT moderaunina assessingtumormolecularprofilingtoguidetreatmentsforpatientswithadvancedfemalegenitaltractmalignancy AT tabassumneha assessingtumormolecularprofilingtoguidetreatmentsforpatientswithadvancedfemalegenitaltractmalignancy AT krelljonathan assessingtumormolecularprofilingtoguidetreatmentsforpatientswithadvancedfemalegenitaltractmalignancy AT stebbingjustin assessingtumormolecularprofilingtoguidetreatmentsforpatientswithadvancedfemalegenitaltractmalignancy |