Cargando…

Biosimilarity and Interchangeability: Principles and Evidence: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: The efficacy, safety and immunogenicity risk of switching between an originator biologic and a biosimilar or from one biosimilar to another are of potential concern. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to conduct a systematic literature review of the outcomes of switching between biologics and their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McKinnon, Ross A., Cook, Matthew, Liauw, Winston, Marabani, Mona, Marschner, Ian C., Packer, Nicolle H., Prins, Johannes B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-017-0256-z
_version_ 1783300366503247872
author McKinnon, Ross A.
Cook, Matthew
Liauw, Winston
Marabani, Mona
Marschner, Ian C.
Packer, Nicolle H.
Prins, Johannes B.
author_facet McKinnon, Ross A.
Cook, Matthew
Liauw, Winston
Marabani, Mona
Marschner, Ian C.
Packer, Nicolle H.
Prins, Johannes B.
author_sort McKinnon, Ross A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The efficacy, safety and immunogenicity risk of switching between an originator biologic and a biosimilar or from one biosimilar to another are of potential concern. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to conduct a systematic literature review of the outcomes of switching between biologics and their biosimilars and identify any evidence gaps. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library from inception to June 2017. Relevant societal meetings were also checked. Peer-reviewed studies reporting efficacy and/or safety data on switching between originator and biosimilar products or from one biosimilar to another were selected. Studies with fewer than 20 switched patients were excluded. Data were extracted on interventions, study population, reason for treatment switching, efficacy outcomes, safety and anti-drug antibodies. RESULTS: The systematic literature search identified 63 primary publications covering 57 switching studies. The reason for switching was reported as non-medical in 50 studies (23 clinical, 27 observational). Seven studies (all observational) did not report whether the reasons for switching were medical or non-medical. In 38 of the 57 studies, fewer than 100 patients were switched. Follow-up after switching went beyond 1 year in eight of the 57 studies. Of the 57 studies, 33 included statistical analysis of disease activity or patient outcomes; the majority of these studies found no statistically significant differences between groups for main efficacy parameters (based on P < 0.05 or predefined acceptance ranges), although some studies observed changes for some parameters. Most studies reported similar safety profiles between groups. CONCLUSIONS: There are important evidence gaps around the safety of switching between biologics and their biosimilars. Sufficiently powered and appropriately statistically analysed clinical trials and pharmacovigilance studies, with long-term follow-ups and multiple switches, are needed to support decision-making around biosimilar switching. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40259-017-0256-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5814534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58145342018-02-26 Biosimilarity and Interchangeability: Principles and Evidence: A Systematic Review McKinnon, Ross A. Cook, Matthew Liauw, Winston Marabani, Mona Marschner, Ian C. Packer, Nicolle H. Prins, Johannes B. BioDrugs Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The efficacy, safety and immunogenicity risk of switching between an originator biologic and a biosimilar or from one biosimilar to another are of potential concern. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to conduct a systematic literature review of the outcomes of switching between biologics and their biosimilars and identify any evidence gaps. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library from inception to June 2017. Relevant societal meetings were also checked. Peer-reviewed studies reporting efficacy and/or safety data on switching between originator and biosimilar products or from one biosimilar to another were selected. Studies with fewer than 20 switched patients were excluded. Data were extracted on interventions, study population, reason for treatment switching, efficacy outcomes, safety and anti-drug antibodies. RESULTS: The systematic literature search identified 63 primary publications covering 57 switching studies. The reason for switching was reported as non-medical in 50 studies (23 clinical, 27 observational). Seven studies (all observational) did not report whether the reasons for switching were medical or non-medical. In 38 of the 57 studies, fewer than 100 patients were switched. Follow-up after switching went beyond 1 year in eight of the 57 studies. Of the 57 studies, 33 included statistical analysis of disease activity or patient outcomes; the majority of these studies found no statistically significant differences between groups for main efficacy parameters (based on P < 0.05 or predefined acceptance ranges), although some studies observed changes for some parameters. Most studies reported similar safety profiles between groups. CONCLUSIONS: There are important evidence gaps around the safety of switching between biologics and their biosimilars. Sufficiently powered and appropriately statistically analysed clinical trials and pharmacovigilance studies, with long-term follow-ups and multiple switches, are needed to support decision-making around biosimilar switching. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40259-017-0256-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-01-17 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5814534/ /pubmed/29344876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-017-0256-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
McKinnon, Ross A.
Cook, Matthew
Liauw, Winston
Marabani, Mona
Marschner, Ian C.
Packer, Nicolle H.
Prins, Johannes B.
Biosimilarity and Interchangeability: Principles and Evidence: A Systematic Review
title Biosimilarity and Interchangeability: Principles and Evidence: A Systematic Review
title_full Biosimilarity and Interchangeability: Principles and Evidence: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Biosimilarity and Interchangeability: Principles and Evidence: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Biosimilarity and Interchangeability: Principles and Evidence: A Systematic Review
title_short Biosimilarity and Interchangeability: Principles and Evidence: A Systematic Review
title_sort biosimilarity and interchangeability: principles and evidence: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29344876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40259-017-0256-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mckinnonrossa biosimilarityandinterchangeabilityprinciplesandevidenceasystematicreview
AT cookmatthew biosimilarityandinterchangeabilityprinciplesandevidenceasystematicreview
AT liauwwinston biosimilarityandinterchangeabilityprinciplesandevidenceasystematicreview
AT marabanimona biosimilarityandinterchangeabilityprinciplesandevidenceasystematicreview
AT marschnerianc biosimilarityandinterchangeabilityprinciplesandevidenceasystematicreview
AT packernicolleh biosimilarityandinterchangeabilityprinciplesandevidenceasystematicreview
AT prinsjohannesb biosimilarityandinterchangeabilityprinciplesandevidenceasystematicreview