Cargando…

The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent

It is sometimes argued that autonomous decision-making requires that the decision-maker’s desires are authentic, i.e., “genuine,” “truly her own,” “not out of character,” or similar. In this article, it is argued that a method to reliably determine the authenticity (or inauthenticity) of a desire ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ahlin, Jesper
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28597325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9783-0
_version_ 1783300366985592832
author Ahlin, Jesper
author_facet Ahlin, Jesper
author_sort Ahlin, Jesper
collection PubMed
description It is sometimes argued that autonomous decision-making requires that the decision-maker’s desires are authentic, i.e., “genuine,” “truly her own,” “not out of character,” or similar. In this article, it is argued that a method to reliably determine the authenticity (or inauthenticity) of a desire cannot be developed. A taxonomy of characteristics displayed by different theories of authenticity is introduced and applied to evaluate such theories categorically, in contrast to the prior approach of treating them individually. The conclusion is drawn that, in practice, the authenticity of desires cannot be reliably determined. It is suggested that authenticity should therefore not be employed in informed consent practices in healthcare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5814536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58145362018-02-26 The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent Ahlin, Jesper Med Health Care Philos Scientific Contribution It is sometimes argued that autonomous decision-making requires that the decision-maker’s desires are authentic, i.e., “genuine,” “truly her own,” “not out of character,” or similar. In this article, it is argued that a method to reliably determine the authenticity (or inauthenticity) of a desire cannot be developed. A taxonomy of characteristics displayed by different theories of authenticity is introduced and applied to evaluate such theories categorically, in contrast to the prior approach of treating them individually. The conclusion is drawn that, in practice, the authenticity of desires cannot be reliably determined. It is suggested that authenticity should therefore not be employed in informed consent practices in healthcare. Springer Netherlands 2017-06-08 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5814536/ /pubmed/28597325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9783-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Scientific Contribution
Ahlin, Jesper
The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent
title The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent
title_full The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent
title_fullStr The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent
title_full_unstemmed The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent
title_short The impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent
title_sort impossibility of reliably determining the authenticity of desires: implications for informed consent
topic Scientific Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28597325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9783-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ahlinjesper theimpossibilityofreliablydeterminingtheauthenticityofdesiresimplicationsforinformedconsent
AT ahlinjesper impossibilityofreliablydeterminingtheauthenticityofdesiresimplicationsforinformedconsent