Cargando…

The implications of spatially variable pre‐emergence herbicide efficacy for weed management

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of pre‐emergence herbicides within fields is spatially variable as a consequence of soil heterogeneity. We quantified the effect of soil organic matter on the efficacy of two pre‐emergence herbicides, flufenacet and pendimethalin, against Alopecurus myosuroides and investiga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metcalfe, Helen, Milne, Alice E, Hull, Richard, Murdoch, Alistair J, Storkey, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29095563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4784
_version_ 1783300412189704192
author Metcalfe, Helen
Milne, Alice E
Hull, Richard
Murdoch, Alistair J
Storkey, Jonathan
author_facet Metcalfe, Helen
Milne, Alice E
Hull, Richard
Murdoch, Alistair J
Storkey, Jonathan
author_sort Metcalfe, Helen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The efficacy of pre‐emergence herbicides within fields is spatially variable as a consequence of soil heterogeneity. We quantified the effect of soil organic matter on the efficacy of two pre‐emergence herbicides, flufenacet and pendimethalin, against Alopecurus myosuroides and investigated the implications of variation in organic matter for weed management using a crop–weed competition model. RESULTS: Soil organic matter played a critical role in determining the level of control achieved. The high organic matter soil had more surviving weeds with higher biomass than the low organic matter soil. In the absence of competition, surviving plants recovered to produce the same amount of seed as if no herbicide had been applied. The competition model predicted that weeds surviving pre‐emergence herbicides could compensate for sublethal effects even when competing with the crop. The ED50 (median effective dose) was higher for weed seed production than seedling mortality or biomass. This difference was greatest on high organic matter soil. CONCLUSION: These results show that the application rate of herbicides should be adjusted to account for within‐field variation in soil organic matter. The results from the modelling emphasised the importance of crop competition in limiting the capacity of weeds surviving pre‐emergence herbicides to compensate and replenish the seedbank. © 2017 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5814844
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58148442018-02-27 The implications of spatially variable pre‐emergence herbicide efficacy for weed management Metcalfe, Helen Milne, Alice E Hull, Richard Murdoch, Alistair J Storkey, Jonathan Pest Manag Sci Research Articles BACKGROUND: The efficacy of pre‐emergence herbicides within fields is spatially variable as a consequence of soil heterogeneity. We quantified the effect of soil organic matter on the efficacy of two pre‐emergence herbicides, flufenacet and pendimethalin, against Alopecurus myosuroides and investigated the implications of variation in organic matter for weed management using a crop–weed competition model. RESULTS: Soil organic matter played a critical role in determining the level of control achieved. The high organic matter soil had more surviving weeds with higher biomass than the low organic matter soil. In the absence of competition, surviving plants recovered to produce the same amount of seed as if no herbicide had been applied. The competition model predicted that weeds surviving pre‐emergence herbicides could compensate for sublethal effects even when competing with the crop. The ED50 (median effective dose) was higher for weed seed production than seedling mortality or biomass. This difference was greatest on high organic matter soil. CONCLUSION: These results show that the application rate of herbicides should be adjusted to account for within‐field variation in soil organic matter. The results from the modelling emphasised the importance of crop competition in limiting the capacity of weeds surviving pre‐emergence herbicides to compensate and replenish the seedbank. © 2017 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2017-12-14 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5814844/ /pubmed/29095563 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4784 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Metcalfe, Helen
Milne, Alice E
Hull, Richard
Murdoch, Alistair J
Storkey, Jonathan
The implications of spatially variable pre‐emergence herbicide efficacy for weed management
title The implications of spatially variable pre‐emergence herbicide efficacy for weed management
title_full The implications of spatially variable pre‐emergence herbicide efficacy for weed management
title_fullStr The implications of spatially variable pre‐emergence herbicide efficacy for weed management
title_full_unstemmed The implications of spatially variable pre‐emergence herbicide efficacy for weed management
title_short The implications of spatially variable pre‐emergence herbicide efficacy for weed management
title_sort implications of spatially variable pre‐emergence herbicide efficacy for weed management
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29095563
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.4784
work_keys_str_mv AT metcalfehelen theimplicationsofspatiallyvariablepreemergenceherbicideefficacyforweedmanagement
AT milnealicee theimplicationsofspatiallyvariablepreemergenceherbicideefficacyforweedmanagement
AT hullrichard theimplicationsofspatiallyvariablepreemergenceherbicideefficacyforweedmanagement
AT murdochalistairj theimplicationsofspatiallyvariablepreemergenceherbicideefficacyforweedmanagement
AT storkeyjonathan theimplicationsofspatiallyvariablepreemergenceherbicideefficacyforweedmanagement
AT metcalfehelen implicationsofspatiallyvariablepreemergenceherbicideefficacyforweedmanagement
AT milnealicee implicationsofspatiallyvariablepreemergenceherbicideefficacyforweedmanagement
AT hullrichard implicationsofspatiallyvariablepreemergenceherbicideefficacyforweedmanagement
AT murdochalistairj implicationsofspatiallyvariablepreemergenceherbicideefficacyforweedmanagement
AT storkeyjonathan implicationsofspatiallyvariablepreemergenceherbicideefficacyforweedmanagement