Cargando…
Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE: The PROCO RCT is a multicenter, double‐blind, crossover, randomized controlled trial (RCT) that investigated the effects of rate on analgesia in kilohertz frequency (1–10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were implanted with SCS systems and underwent an e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29220121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12746 |
_version_ | 1783300414888738816 |
---|---|
author | Thomson, Simon J. Tavakkolizadeh, Moein Love‐Jones, Sarah Patel, Nikunj K. Gu, Jianwen Wendy Bains, Amarpreet Doan, Que Moffitt, Michael |
author_facet | Thomson, Simon J. Tavakkolizadeh, Moein Love‐Jones, Sarah Patel, Nikunj K. Gu, Jianwen Wendy Bains, Amarpreet Doan, Que Moffitt, Michael |
author_sort | Thomson, Simon J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The PROCO RCT is a multicenter, double‐blind, crossover, randomized controlled trial (RCT) that investigated the effects of rate on analgesia in kilohertz frequency (1–10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were implanted with SCS systems and underwent an eight‐week search to identify the best location (“sweet spot”) of stimulation at 10 kHz within the searched region (T8–T11). An electronic diary (e‐diary) prompted patients for pain scores three times per day. Patients who responded to 10 kHz per e‐diary numeric rating scale (ED‐NRS) pain scores proceeded to double‐blind rate randomization. Patients received 1, 4, 7, and 10 kHz SCS at the same sweet spot found for 10 kHz in randomized order (four weeks at each frequency). For each frequency, pulse width and amplitude were titrated to optimize therapy. RESULTS: All frequencies provided equivalent pain relief as measured by ED‐NRS (p ≤ 0.002). However, mean charge per second differed across frequencies, with 1 kHz SCS requiring 60–70% less charge than higher frequencies (p ≤ 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The PROCO RCT provides Level I evidence for equivalent pain relief from 1 to 10 kHz with appropriate titration of pulse width and amplitude. 1 kHz required significantly less charge than higher frequencies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5814855 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58148552018-02-27 Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial Thomson, Simon J. Tavakkolizadeh, Moein Love‐Jones, Sarah Patel, Nikunj K. Gu, Jianwen Wendy Bains, Amarpreet Doan, Que Moffitt, Michael Neuromodulation Clinical Trials OBJECTIVE: The PROCO RCT is a multicenter, double‐blind, crossover, randomized controlled trial (RCT) that investigated the effects of rate on analgesia in kilohertz frequency (1–10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were implanted with SCS systems and underwent an eight‐week search to identify the best location (“sweet spot”) of stimulation at 10 kHz within the searched region (T8–T11). An electronic diary (e‐diary) prompted patients for pain scores three times per day. Patients who responded to 10 kHz per e‐diary numeric rating scale (ED‐NRS) pain scores proceeded to double‐blind rate randomization. Patients received 1, 4, 7, and 10 kHz SCS at the same sweet spot found for 10 kHz in randomized order (four weeks at each frequency). For each frequency, pulse width and amplitude were titrated to optimize therapy. RESULTS: All frequencies provided equivalent pain relief as measured by ED‐NRS (p ≤ 0.002). However, mean charge per second differed across frequencies, with 1 kHz SCS requiring 60–70% less charge than higher frequencies (p ≤ 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The PROCO RCT provides Level I evidence for equivalent pain relief from 1 to 10 kHz with appropriate titration of pulse width and amplitude. 1 kHz required significantly less charge than higher frequencies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-08 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5814855/ /pubmed/29220121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12746 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Neuromodulation Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trials Thomson, Simon J. Tavakkolizadeh, Moein Love‐Jones, Sarah Patel, Nikunj K. Gu, Jianwen Wendy Bains, Amarpreet Doan, Que Moffitt, Michael Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | effects of rate on analgesia in kilohertz frequency spinal cord stimulation: results of the proco randomized controlled trial |
topic | Clinical Trials |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29220121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12746 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomsonsimonj effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tavakkolizadehmoein effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lovejonessarah effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial AT patelnikunjk effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gujianwenwendy effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bainsamarpreet effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial AT doanque effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial AT moffittmichael effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial |