Cargando…

Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: The PROCO RCT is a multicenter, double‐blind, crossover, randomized controlled trial (RCT) that investigated the effects of rate on analgesia in kilohertz frequency (1–10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were implanted with SCS systems and underwent an e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomson, Simon J., Tavakkolizadeh, Moein, Love‐Jones, Sarah, Patel, Nikunj K., Gu, Jianwen Wendy, Bains, Amarpreet, Doan, Que, Moffitt, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29220121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12746
_version_ 1783300414888738816
author Thomson, Simon J.
Tavakkolizadeh, Moein
Love‐Jones, Sarah
Patel, Nikunj K.
Gu, Jianwen Wendy
Bains, Amarpreet
Doan, Que
Moffitt, Michael
author_facet Thomson, Simon J.
Tavakkolizadeh, Moein
Love‐Jones, Sarah
Patel, Nikunj K.
Gu, Jianwen Wendy
Bains, Amarpreet
Doan, Que
Moffitt, Michael
author_sort Thomson, Simon J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The PROCO RCT is a multicenter, double‐blind, crossover, randomized controlled trial (RCT) that investigated the effects of rate on analgesia in kilohertz frequency (1–10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were implanted with SCS systems and underwent an eight‐week search to identify the best location (“sweet spot”) of stimulation at 10 kHz within the searched region (T8–T11). An electronic diary (e‐diary) prompted patients for pain scores three times per day. Patients who responded to 10 kHz per e‐diary numeric rating scale (ED‐NRS) pain scores proceeded to double‐blind rate randomization. Patients received 1, 4, 7, and 10 kHz SCS at the same sweet spot found for 10 kHz in randomized order (four weeks at each frequency). For each frequency, pulse width and amplitude were titrated to optimize therapy. RESULTS: All frequencies provided equivalent pain relief as measured by ED‐NRS (p ≤ 0.002). However, mean charge per second differed across frequencies, with 1 kHz SCS requiring 60–70% less charge than higher frequencies (p ≤ 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The PROCO RCT provides Level I evidence for equivalent pain relief from 1 to 10 kHz with appropriate titration of pulse width and amplitude. 1 kHz required significantly less charge than higher frequencies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5814855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58148552018-02-27 Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial Thomson, Simon J. Tavakkolizadeh, Moein Love‐Jones, Sarah Patel, Nikunj K. Gu, Jianwen Wendy Bains, Amarpreet Doan, Que Moffitt, Michael Neuromodulation Clinical Trials OBJECTIVE: The PROCO RCT is a multicenter, double‐blind, crossover, randomized controlled trial (RCT) that investigated the effects of rate on analgesia in kilohertz frequency (1–10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were implanted with SCS systems and underwent an eight‐week search to identify the best location (“sweet spot”) of stimulation at 10 kHz within the searched region (T8–T11). An electronic diary (e‐diary) prompted patients for pain scores three times per day. Patients who responded to 10 kHz per e‐diary numeric rating scale (ED‐NRS) pain scores proceeded to double‐blind rate randomization. Patients received 1, 4, 7, and 10 kHz SCS at the same sweet spot found for 10 kHz in randomized order (four weeks at each frequency). For each frequency, pulse width and amplitude were titrated to optimize therapy. RESULTS: All frequencies provided equivalent pain relief as measured by ED‐NRS (p ≤ 0.002). However, mean charge per second differed across frequencies, with 1 kHz SCS requiring 60–70% less charge than higher frequencies (p ≤ 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: The PROCO RCT provides Level I evidence for equivalent pain relief from 1 to 10 kHz with appropriate titration of pulse width and amplitude. 1 kHz required significantly less charge than higher frequencies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-08 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5814855/ /pubmed/29220121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12746 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Neuromodulation Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Clinical Trials
Thomson, Simon J.
Tavakkolizadeh, Moein
Love‐Jones, Sarah
Patel, Nikunj K.
Gu, Jianwen Wendy
Bains, Amarpreet
Doan, Que
Moffitt, Michael
Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial
title Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Effects of Rate on Analgesia in Kilohertz Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of the PROCO Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort effects of rate on analgesia in kilohertz frequency spinal cord stimulation: results of the proco randomized controlled trial
topic Clinical Trials
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29220121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12746
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsonsimonj effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tavakkolizadehmoein effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lovejonessarah effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT patelnikunjk effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gujianwenwendy effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bainsamarpreet effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT doanque effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT moffittmichael effectsofrateonanalgesiainkilohertzfrequencyspinalcordstimulationresultsoftheprocorandomizedcontrolledtrial