Cargando…

Distracter suppression dominates attentional modulation of responses to multiple stimuli inside the receptive fields of middle temporal neurons

Single‐cell studies in macaques have shown that attending to one of two stimuli, positioned inside a visual neuron's receptive field (RF), modulates the neuron's response to reflect the features of the attended stimulus. Such a modulation has been described as a ‘push–pull’ effect relative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malek, Nour, Treue, Stefan, Khayat, Paul, Martinez‐Trujillo, Julio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29094412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13764
_version_ 1783300420716724224
author Malek, Nour
Treue, Stefan
Khayat, Paul
Martinez‐Trujillo, Julio
author_facet Malek, Nour
Treue, Stefan
Khayat, Paul
Martinez‐Trujillo, Julio
author_sort Malek, Nour
collection PubMed
description Single‐cell studies in macaques have shown that attending to one of two stimuli, positioned inside a visual neuron's receptive field (RF), modulates the neuron's response to reflect the features of the attended stimulus. Such a modulation has been described as a ‘push–pull’ effect relative to a reference response: a neuron's response increases when attention is directed to a preferred stimulus, and decreases when attention is directed to a non‐preferred stimulus. It has been further suggested that the response increase when attending to a preferred stimulus is the predominant effect. Here, we show that the observed attentional modulation depends on the reference response. We recorded neuronal responses in motion processing area middle temporal (MT) of macaques to two moving random dot patterns positioned inside neurons’ RF. One pattern always moved in the neuron's antipreferred direction (null pattern), while the other moved in one of 12 directions (tuning pattern). At the beginning of a trial, a cue indicated the location and direction of the target. The animal was required to release a lever when a change in the target direction occurred, and to ignore changes in the distracter. Relative to neurons’ initial responses to the dual stimuli (when attention was less likely to modulate responses), attending to the tuning pattern did not significantly modulate responses over time. However, attending to the null pattern progressively decreased responses over time. These results were quantitatively described by filter and input gain models, characterising a predominant response suppression relative to a reference response, rather than response enhancement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5814879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58148792018-02-27 Distracter suppression dominates attentional modulation of responses to multiple stimuli inside the receptive fields of middle temporal neurons Malek, Nour Treue, Stefan Khayat, Paul Martinez‐Trujillo, Julio Eur J Neurosci Cognitive Neuroscience Single‐cell studies in macaques have shown that attending to one of two stimuli, positioned inside a visual neuron's receptive field (RF), modulates the neuron's response to reflect the features of the attended stimulus. Such a modulation has been described as a ‘push–pull’ effect relative to a reference response: a neuron's response increases when attention is directed to a preferred stimulus, and decreases when attention is directed to a non‐preferred stimulus. It has been further suggested that the response increase when attending to a preferred stimulus is the predominant effect. Here, we show that the observed attentional modulation depends on the reference response. We recorded neuronal responses in motion processing area middle temporal (MT) of macaques to two moving random dot patterns positioned inside neurons’ RF. One pattern always moved in the neuron's antipreferred direction (null pattern), while the other moved in one of 12 directions (tuning pattern). At the beginning of a trial, a cue indicated the location and direction of the target. The animal was required to release a lever when a change in the target direction occurred, and to ignore changes in the distracter. Relative to neurons’ initial responses to the dual stimuli (when attention was less likely to modulate responses), attending to the tuning pattern did not significantly modulate responses over time. However, attending to the null pattern progressively decreased responses over time. These results were quantitatively described by filter and input gain models, characterising a predominant response suppression relative to a reference response, rather than response enhancement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-19 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5814879/ /pubmed/29094412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13764 Text en © 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Cognitive Neuroscience
Malek, Nour
Treue, Stefan
Khayat, Paul
Martinez‐Trujillo, Julio
Distracter suppression dominates attentional modulation of responses to multiple stimuli inside the receptive fields of middle temporal neurons
title Distracter suppression dominates attentional modulation of responses to multiple stimuli inside the receptive fields of middle temporal neurons
title_full Distracter suppression dominates attentional modulation of responses to multiple stimuli inside the receptive fields of middle temporal neurons
title_fullStr Distracter suppression dominates attentional modulation of responses to multiple stimuli inside the receptive fields of middle temporal neurons
title_full_unstemmed Distracter suppression dominates attentional modulation of responses to multiple stimuli inside the receptive fields of middle temporal neurons
title_short Distracter suppression dominates attentional modulation of responses to multiple stimuli inside the receptive fields of middle temporal neurons
title_sort distracter suppression dominates attentional modulation of responses to multiple stimuli inside the receptive fields of middle temporal neurons
topic Cognitive Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29094412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13764
work_keys_str_mv AT maleknour distractersuppressiondominatesattentionalmodulationofresponsestomultiplestimuliinsidethereceptivefieldsofmiddletemporalneurons
AT treuestefan distractersuppressiondominatesattentionalmodulationofresponsestomultiplestimuliinsidethereceptivefieldsofmiddletemporalneurons
AT khayatpaul distractersuppressiondominatesattentionalmodulationofresponsestomultiplestimuliinsidethereceptivefieldsofmiddletemporalneurons
AT martineztrujillojulio distractersuppressiondominatesattentionalmodulationofresponsestomultiplestimuliinsidethereceptivefieldsofmiddletemporalneurons