Cargando…
Second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC without actionable mutations: is immunotherapy the ‘panacea’ for all patients?
The therapeutic approach for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable mutations has been revolutionized by the recent approval of new effective drugs with various mechanisms of action, including nintedanib, ramucirumab, nivolumab, pemb...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29448944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1011-0 |
_version_ | 1783300455194951680 |
---|---|
author | Morabito, Alessandro |
author_facet | Morabito, Alessandro |
author_sort | Morabito, Alessandro |
collection | PubMed |
description | The therapeutic approach for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable mutations has been revolutionized by the recent approval of new effective drugs with various mechanisms of action, including nintedanib, ramucirumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and afatinib. The recent network meta-analysis of Créquit et al. (BMC Medicine, 15:193, 2017) compared the effectiveness and tolerability of the second-line treatments for advanced NSCLC with wild-type or unknown status for EGFR. The authors found that immunotherapy might be more efficacious than the currently recommended treatments. However, their meta-analysis does not take into account the role of predictive biomarkers – this is indeed a crucial point in the decision-making process considering that only a fraction of advanced NSCLC patients might derive a long-term benefit from second-line immunotherapy. The identification of molecular biomarkers that can predict a response to immune checkpoints, angiogenesis, and EGFR inhibitors remains an important goal of clinical research in order to maximize the benefit of these agents and to aid clinicians in the decision-making process. Please see related article: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5815183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58151832018-02-21 Second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC without actionable mutations: is immunotherapy the ‘panacea’ for all patients? Morabito, Alessandro BMC Med Commentary The therapeutic approach for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable mutations has been revolutionized by the recent approval of new effective drugs with various mechanisms of action, including nintedanib, ramucirumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and afatinib. The recent network meta-analysis of Créquit et al. (BMC Medicine, 15:193, 2017) compared the effectiveness and tolerability of the second-line treatments for advanced NSCLC with wild-type or unknown status for EGFR. The authors found that immunotherapy might be more efficacious than the currently recommended treatments. However, their meta-analysis does not take into account the role of predictive biomarkers – this is indeed a crucial point in the decision-making process considering that only a fraction of advanced NSCLC patients might derive a long-term benefit from second-line immunotherapy. The identification of molecular biomarkers that can predict a response to immune checkpoints, angiogenesis, and EGFR inhibitors remains an important goal of clinical research in order to maximize the benefit of these agents and to aid clinicians in the decision-making process. Please see related article: https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-017-0954-x BioMed Central 2018-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5815183/ /pubmed/29448944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1011-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Morabito, Alessandro Second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC without actionable mutations: is immunotherapy the ‘panacea’ for all patients? |
title | Second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC without actionable mutations: is immunotherapy the ‘panacea’ for all patients? |
title_full | Second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC without actionable mutations: is immunotherapy the ‘panacea’ for all patients? |
title_fullStr | Second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC without actionable mutations: is immunotherapy the ‘panacea’ for all patients? |
title_full_unstemmed | Second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC without actionable mutations: is immunotherapy the ‘panacea’ for all patients? |
title_short | Second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC without actionable mutations: is immunotherapy the ‘panacea’ for all patients? |
title_sort | second-line treatment for advanced nsclc without actionable mutations: is immunotherapy the ‘panacea’ for all patients? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29448944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1011-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morabitoalessandro secondlinetreatmentforadvancednsclcwithoutactionablemutationsisimmunotherapythepanaceaforallpatients |