Cargando…

Facial nerve stimulation in normal pigs and healthy human volunteers: transitional development of a medical device for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND: Magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve has been tested in preclinical studies as a new, non-invasive emergency treatment of ischemic stroke that acts by increasing cerebral blood flow (CBF). The objective of the studies reported herein was to identify minimal stimulation parameters tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanchez, Olivia, García, Andrea, Castro-Prado, Fernando, Perez, Miriam, Lara-Estrada, Rafael, Ramirez-Meza, Martin, Godinez, Montserrat, Coco, Michael L., Azpiroz, Joaquín, Borsody, Mark K., Sacristán, Emilio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29448967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1398-6
_version_ 1783300466522718208
author Sanchez, Olivia
García, Andrea
Castro-Prado, Fernando
Perez, Miriam
Lara-Estrada, Rafael
Ramirez-Meza, Martin
Godinez, Montserrat
Coco, Michael L.
Azpiroz, Joaquín
Borsody, Mark K.
Sacristán, Emilio
author_facet Sanchez, Olivia
García, Andrea
Castro-Prado, Fernando
Perez, Miriam
Lara-Estrada, Rafael
Ramirez-Meza, Martin
Godinez, Montserrat
Coco, Michael L.
Azpiroz, Joaquín
Borsody, Mark K.
Sacristán, Emilio
author_sort Sanchez, Olivia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve has been tested in preclinical studies as a new, non-invasive emergency treatment of ischemic stroke that acts by increasing cerebral blood flow (CBF). The objective of the studies reported herein was to identify minimal stimulation parameters that increase CBF in large animals and then test those stimulation parameters in healthy volunteers for safety, tolerability, and effectiveness at increasing CBF. This translational research is necessary preparation for clinical studies in ischemic stroke patients. METHODS: Initial experiments in anesthetized Yorkshire pigs were undertaken in order to identify the lowest stimulus power and duration that increase CBF. A full 3 × 3 factorial design was used to evaluate magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve at various stimulation powers (1.3, 1.6, and 1.9 Tesla field strength at coil surface) and for various durations (2, 3.5, and 5 min). CBF was measured with contrast MRI perfusion imaging and the internal carotid arteries were assessed with MR angiography. Magnetic facial nerve stimulation with parameters identified in the pig study was then applied to 35 healthy volunteers. Safety was assessed with adverse event reports and by medical examination. Tolerability was defined as each volunteer’s ability to withstand at least 2 min of stimulation. Volunteers could determine the maximum power of stimulation they received during a ramp-up period. RESULTS: In pigs, unilateral facial nerve stimulation increased CBF by as much as 77% over pre-stimulation baseline when administered across a range of 1.3–1.9 Tesla power and for 2- to 5-min duration. No clear dose–response relationship could be observed across this range, but lower powers and durations than these were markedly less effective. The effect of a single stimulation lasted 90 min. A second stimulation delivered 100 min after the first stimulation sustained the increased CBF without evidence of tachyphylaxis. In human, bilateral facial nerve stimulation caused only non-serious adverse events that were limited to the 2-min stimulation period. Tolerability was greatly improved by gentle encouragement from the study staff, which enabled most volunteers to tolerate 1.6–1.8 Tesla of stimulation power. CBF measures taken approximately 10 min after stimulation demonstrated on average a 32 ± 6% increase in CBF, with ≥ 25% increases in CBF occurring in 10 of the 31 volunteers who had adequate CBF measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The minimal effective stimulation parameters defined by increased CBF, as identified in the pig study, translated into safe, tolerable, and effective stimulation of healthy volunteers. These results support the future development and evaluation of non-invasive facial nerve stimulation for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke. Trial Registration retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov NRV_P1_01_15 on June 6, 2017
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5815230
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58152302018-02-21 Facial nerve stimulation in normal pigs and healthy human volunteers: transitional development of a medical device for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke Sanchez, Olivia García, Andrea Castro-Prado, Fernando Perez, Miriam Lara-Estrada, Rafael Ramirez-Meza, Martin Godinez, Montserrat Coco, Michael L. Azpiroz, Joaquín Borsody, Mark K. Sacristán, Emilio J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve has been tested in preclinical studies as a new, non-invasive emergency treatment of ischemic stroke that acts by increasing cerebral blood flow (CBF). The objective of the studies reported herein was to identify minimal stimulation parameters that increase CBF in large animals and then test those stimulation parameters in healthy volunteers for safety, tolerability, and effectiveness at increasing CBF. This translational research is necessary preparation for clinical studies in ischemic stroke patients. METHODS: Initial experiments in anesthetized Yorkshire pigs were undertaken in order to identify the lowest stimulus power and duration that increase CBF. A full 3 × 3 factorial design was used to evaluate magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve at various stimulation powers (1.3, 1.6, and 1.9 Tesla field strength at coil surface) and for various durations (2, 3.5, and 5 min). CBF was measured with contrast MRI perfusion imaging and the internal carotid arteries were assessed with MR angiography. Magnetic facial nerve stimulation with parameters identified in the pig study was then applied to 35 healthy volunteers. Safety was assessed with adverse event reports and by medical examination. Tolerability was defined as each volunteer’s ability to withstand at least 2 min of stimulation. Volunteers could determine the maximum power of stimulation they received during a ramp-up period. RESULTS: In pigs, unilateral facial nerve stimulation increased CBF by as much as 77% over pre-stimulation baseline when administered across a range of 1.3–1.9 Tesla power and for 2- to 5-min duration. No clear dose–response relationship could be observed across this range, but lower powers and durations than these were markedly less effective. The effect of a single stimulation lasted 90 min. A second stimulation delivered 100 min after the first stimulation sustained the increased CBF without evidence of tachyphylaxis. In human, bilateral facial nerve stimulation caused only non-serious adverse events that were limited to the 2-min stimulation period. Tolerability was greatly improved by gentle encouragement from the study staff, which enabled most volunteers to tolerate 1.6–1.8 Tesla of stimulation power. CBF measures taken approximately 10 min after stimulation demonstrated on average a 32 ± 6% increase in CBF, with ≥ 25% increases in CBF occurring in 10 of the 31 volunteers who had adequate CBF measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The minimal effective stimulation parameters defined by increased CBF, as identified in the pig study, translated into safe, tolerable, and effective stimulation of healthy volunteers. These results support the future development and evaluation of non-invasive facial nerve stimulation for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke. Trial Registration retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov NRV_P1_01_15 on June 6, 2017 BioMed Central 2018-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5815230/ /pubmed/29448967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1398-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Sanchez, Olivia
García, Andrea
Castro-Prado, Fernando
Perez, Miriam
Lara-Estrada, Rafael
Ramirez-Meza, Martin
Godinez, Montserrat
Coco, Michael L.
Azpiroz, Joaquín
Borsody, Mark K.
Sacristán, Emilio
Facial nerve stimulation in normal pigs and healthy human volunteers: transitional development of a medical device for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke
title Facial nerve stimulation in normal pigs and healthy human volunteers: transitional development of a medical device for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke
title_full Facial nerve stimulation in normal pigs and healthy human volunteers: transitional development of a medical device for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke
title_fullStr Facial nerve stimulation in normal pigs and healthy human volunteers: transitional development of a medical device for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke
title_full_unstemmed Facial nerve stimulation in normal pigs and healthy human volunteers: transitional development of a medical device for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke
title_short Facial nerve stimulation in normal pigs and healthy human volunteers: transitional development of a medical device for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke
title_sort facial nerve stimulation in normal pigs and healthy human volunteers: transitional development of a medical device for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815230/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29448967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1398-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sanchezolivia facialnervestimulationinnormalpigsandhealthyhumanvolunteerstransitionaldevelopmentofamedicaldevicefortheemergencytreatmentofischemicstroke
AT garciaandrea facialnervestimulationinnormalpigsandhealthyhumanvolunteerstransitionaldevelopmentofamedicaldevicefortheemergencytreatmentofischemicstroke
AT castropradofernando facialnervestimulationinnormalpigsandhealthyhumanvolunteerstransitionaldevelopmentofamedicaldevicefortheemergencytreatmentofischemicstroke
AT perezmiriam facialnervestimulationinnormalpigsandhealthyhumanvolunteerstransitionaldevelopmentofamedicaldevicefortheemergencytreatmentofischemicstroke
AT laraestradarafael facialnervestimulationinnormalpigsandhealthyhumanvolunteerstransitionaldevelopmentofamedicaldevicefortheemergencytreatmentofischemicstroke
AT ramirezmezamartin facialnervestimulationinnormalpigsandhealthyhumanvolunteerstransitionaldevelopmentofamedicaldevicefortheemergencytreatmentofischemicstroke
AT godinezmontserrat facialnervestimulationinnormalpigsandhealthyhumanvolunteerstransitionaldevelopmentofamedicaldevicefortheemergencytreatmentofischemicstroke
AT cocomichaell facialnervestimulationinnormalpigsandhealthyhumanvolunteerstransitionaldevelopmentofamedicaldevicefortheemergencytreatmentofischemicstroke
AT azpirozjoaquin facialnervestimulationinnormalpigsandhealthyhumanvolunteerstransitionaldevelopmentofamedicaldevicefortheemergencytreatmentofischemicstroke
AT borsodymarkk facialnervestimulationinnormalpigsandhealthyhumanvolunteerstransitionaldevelopmentofamedicaldevicefortheemergencytreatmentofischemicstroke
AT sacristanemilio facialnervestimulationinnormalpigsandhealthyhumanvolunteerstransitionaldevelopmentofamedicaldevicefortheemergencytreatmentofischemicstroke