Cargando…

The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between subgingival restorations and the target periodontopathogenic bacteria (Pg, Td and Pi) in subgingival biofilm during one year after combined restorative-periodontal treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen systemically healthy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ISLER, Sila Çagri, OZCAN, Gonen, AKCA, Gülcin, KOCABAS, Zahide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29451649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0154
_version_ 1783300490210050048
author ISLER, Sila Çagri
OZCAN, Gonen
AKCA, Gülcin
KOCABAS, Zahide
author_facet ISLER, Sila Çagri
OZCAN, Gonen
AKCA, Gülcin
KOCABAS, Zahide
author_sort ISLER, Sila Çagri
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between subgingival restorations and the target periodontopathogenic bacteria (Pg, Td and Pi) in subgingival biofilm during one year after combined restorative-periodontal treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen systemically healthy subjects, who were positive for the presence of three cervical lesions associated with gingival recessions in three different adjacent teeth, were included in the study. A total of 51 combined defects were treated with connective tissue graft plus a nanofilled composite resin (NCR+CTG), a resin-modified glass ionemer cement (RMGI+CTG) and a fluoride-releasing resin material with pre-reacted glass (PRG), called giomer (Giomer+CTG). Periodontal clinical measurements and subgingival plaque samples were obtained from all combined defects at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after the surgery. The number of bacteria were evaluated by the real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in the amount of DNA copies of Pg, Td and Pi was observed in any of the groups at any time points (p>0.05). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in the amount of DNA copies of the bacteria at baseline and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, regardless of treatment group (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that subgingivally placed NCR, RMGI and giomer restorations can show similar effects on periodontopathogenic bacteria in the treatment of gingival recessions that are associated with noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5815360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58153602018-03-01 The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment ISLER, Sila Çagri OZCAN, Gonen AKCA, Gülcin KOCABAS, Zahide J Appl Oral Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between subgingival restorations and the target periodontopathogenic bacteria (Pg, Td and Pi) in subgingival biofilm during one year after combined restorative-periodontal treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen systemically healthy subjects, who were positive for the presence of three cervical lesions associated with gingival recessions in three different adjacent teeth, were included in the study. A total of 51 combined defects were treated with connective tissue graft plus a nanofilled composite resin (NCR+CTG), a resin-modified glass ionemer cement (RMGI+CTG) and a fluoride-releasing resin material with pre-reacted glass (PRG), called giomer (Giomer+CTG). Periodontal clinical measurements and subgingival plaque samples were obtained from all combined defects at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after the surgery. The number of bacteria were evaluated by the real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in the amount of DNA copies of Pg, Td and Pi was observed in any of the groups at any time points (p>0.05). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in the amount of DNA copies of the bacteria at baseline and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, regardless of treatment group (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that subgingivally placed NCR, RMGI and giomer restorations can show similar effects on periodontopathogenic bacteria in the treatment of gingival recessions that are associated with noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2018-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5815360/ /pubmed/29451649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0154 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
ISLER, Sila Çagri
OZCAN, Gonen
AKCA, Gülcin
KOCABAS, Zahide
The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment
title The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment
title_full The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment
title_fullStr The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment
title_full_unstemmed The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment
title_short The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment
title_sort effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29451649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0154
work_keys_str_mv AT islersilacagri theeffectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment
AT ozcangonen theeffectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment
AT akcagulcin theeffectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment
AT kocabaszahide theeffectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment
AT islersilacagri effectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment
AT ozcangonen effectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment
AT akcagulcin effectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment
AT kocabaszahide effectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment