Cargando…
The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between subgingival restorations and the target periodontopathogenic bacteria (Pg, Td and Pi) in subgingival biofilm during one year after combined restorative-periodontal treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen systemically healthy...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29451649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0154 |
_version_ | 1783300490210050048 |
---|---|
author | ISLER, Sila Çagri OZCAN, Gonen AKCA, Gülcin KOCABAS, Zahide |
author_facet | ISLER, Sila Çagri OZCAN, Gonen AKCA, Gülcin KOCABAS, Zahide |
author_sort | ISLER, Sila Çagri |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between subgingival restorations and the target periodontopathogenic bacteria (Pg, Td and Pi) in subgingival biofilm during one year after combined restorative-periodontal treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen systemically healthy subjects, who were positive for the presence of three cervical lesions associated with gingival recessions in three different adjacent teeth, were included in the study. A total of 51 combined defects were treated with connective tissue graft plus a nanofilled composite resin (NCR+CTG), a resin-modified glass ionemer cement (RMGI+CTG) and a fluoride-releasing resin material with pre-reacted glass (PRG), called giomer (Giomer+CTG). Periodontal clinical measurements and subgingival plaque samples were obtained from all combined defects at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after the surgery. The number of bacteria were evaluated by the real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in the amount of DNA copies of Pg, Td and Pi was observed in any of the groups at any time points (p>0.05). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in the amount of DNA copies of the bacteria at baseline and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, regardless of treatment group (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that subgingivally placed NCR, RMGI and giomer restorations can show similar effects on periodontopathogenic bacteria in the treatment of gingival recessions that are associated with noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5815360 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58153602018-03-01 The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment ISLER, Sila Çagri OZCAN, Gonen AKCA, Gülcin KOCABAS, Zahide J Appl Oral Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between subgingival restorations and the target periodontopathogenic bacteria (Pg, Td and Pi) in subgingival biofilm during one year after combined restorative-periodontal treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen systemically healthy subjects, who were positive for the presence of three cervical lesions associated with gingival recessions in three different adjacent teeth, were included in the study. A total of 51 combined defects were treated with connective tissue graft plus a nanofilled composite resin (NCR+CTG), a resin-modified glass ionemer cement (RMGI+CTG) and a fluoride-releasing resin material with pre-reacted glass (PRG), called giomer (Giomer+CTG). Periodontal clinical measurements and subgingival plaque samples were obtained from all combined defects at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after the surgery. The number of bacteria were evaluated by the real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) method. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in the amount of DNA copies of Pg, Td and Pi was observed in any of the groups at any time points (p>0.05). In addition, there was no statistically significant difference in the amount of DNA copies of the bacteria at baseline and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, regardless of treatment group (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that subgingivally placed NCR, RMGI and giomer restorations can show similar effects on periodontopathogenic bacteria in the treatment of gingival recessions that are associated with noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs). Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2018-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5815360/ /pubmed/29451649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0154 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article ISLER, Sila Çagri OZCAN, Gonen AKCA, Gülcin KOCABAS, Zahide The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment |
title | The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment |
title_full | The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment |
title_fullStr | The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment |
title_short | The effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment |
title_sort | effects of different restorative materials on periodontopathogens in combined restorative-periodontal treatment |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815360/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29451649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0154 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT islersilacagri theeffectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment AT ozcangonen theeffectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment AT akcagulcin theeffectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment AT kocabaszahide theeffectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment AT islersilacagri effectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment AT ozcangonen effectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment AT akcagulcin effectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment AT kocabaszahide effectsofdifferentrestorativematerialsonperiodontopathogensincombinedrestorativeperiodontaltreatment |