Cargando…

A retrospective analysis of the use of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% following canaloplasty

BACKGROUND: While loteprednol etabonate (LE) suspension 0.5% is approved for the treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation, there have been no reported studies of its use in glaucoma patients undergoing canaloplasty. METHODS: This was a retrospective medical chart review conducted at a single U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Khaimi, Mahmoud A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29491705
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S153912
_version_ 1783300507915255808
author Khaimi, Mahmoud A
author_facet Khaimi, Mahmoud A
author_sort Khaimi, Mahmoud A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While loteprednol etabonate (LE) suspension 0.5% is approved for the treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation, there have been no reported studies of its use in glaucoma patients undergoing canaloplasty. METHODS: This was a retrospective medical chart review conducted at a single US center. Data were collected on patients with glaucoma who underwent canaloplasty with or without cataract surgery, and were prescribed LE suspension 0.5% postoperatively. Outcomes evaluated included postsurgical inflammation (anterior chamber [AC] cells and flare), intraocular pressure (IOP), number of IOP-lowering medications, and postsurgical complications. RESULTS: Data were collected on 204 patients (262 eyes) with a mean (SD) age of 71.6 (11.3) years. The most frequent LE dosing regimens at day 1, week 1, and month 1 postsurgery were QID (92.3%; 241/261), TID (52.6%; 133/253), and QD (65.5%; 78/119), respectively. Inflammation (AC flare and cells), mostly mild, was noted in 33.2% (86/259) of eyes on postoperative day 1 and 8.6% (21/244) of eyes at month 1. Mean IOP and mean number of IOP-lowering medications were significantly reduced from baseline (P<0.001) at all time points postoperatively. Complete (no IOP-lowering medication) or qualified (use of ≤2 IOP-lowering medications) surgical success was achieved in 78.8% and 90.6% of eyes, respectively, at month 6 and 63.4% and 92.7% of eyes at month 36. The most frequently observed postoperative complication was hyphema in 48.7% (126/259) eyes at day 1, which decreased to 0.4% (1/244) of eyes by month 1. IOP ≥30 mmHg was noted in 13 (5.3%) eyes at postoperative week 1 and rarely thereafter, and no patient discontinued therapy because of an IOP increase. CONCLUSION: These real-world data suggest that canaloplasty with or without cataract surgery managed postoperatively with LE suspension 0.5% is effective and safe in the glaucoma patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5815503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58155032018-02-28 A retrospective analysis of the use of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% following canaloplasty Khaimi, Mahmoud A Clin Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: While loteprednol etabonate (LE) suspension 0.5% is approved for the treatment of postoperative ocular inflammation, there have been no reported studies of its use in glaucoma patients undergoing canaloplasty. METHODS: This was a retrospective medical chart review conducted at a single US center. Data were collected on patients with glaucoma who underwent canaloplasty with or without cataract surgery, and were prescribed LE suspension 0.5% postoperatively. Outcomes evaluated included postsurgical inflammation (anterior chamber [AC] cells and flare), intraocular pressure (IOP), number of IOP-lowering medications, and postsurgical complications. RESULTS: Data were collected on 204 patients (262 eyes) with a mean (SD) age of 71.6 (11.3) years. The most frequent LE dosing regimens at day 1, week 1, and month 1 postsurgery were QID (92.3%; 241/261), TID (52.6%; 133/253), and QD (65.5%; 78/119), respectively. Inflammation (AC flare and cells), mostly mild, was noted in 33.2% (86/259) of eyes on postoperative day 1 and 8.6% (21/244) of eyes at month 1. Mean IOP and mean number of IOP-lowering medications were significantly reduced from baseline (P<0.001) at all time points postoperatively. Complete (no IOP-lowering medication) or qualified (use of ≤2 IOP-lowering medications) surgical success was achieved in 78.8% and 90.6% of eyes, respectively, at month 6 and 63.4% and 92.7% of eyes at month 36. The most frequently observed postoperative complication was hyphema in 48.7% (126/259) eyes at day 1, which decreased to 0.4% (1/244) of eyes by month 1. IOP ≥30 mmHg was noted in 13 (5.3%) eyes at postoperative week 1 and rarely thereafter, and no patient discontinued therapy because of an IOP increase. CONCLUSION: These real-world data suggest that canaloplasty with or without cataract surgery managed postoperatively with LE suspension 0.5% is effective and safe in the glaucoma patient. Dove Medical Press 2018-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5815503/ /pubmed/29491705 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S153912 Text en © 2018 Khaimi. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Khaimi, Mahmoud A
A retrospective analysis of the use of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% following canaloplasty
title A retrospective analysis of the use of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% following canaloplasty
title_full A retrospective analysis of the use of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% following canaloplasty
title_fullStr A retrospective analysis of the use of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% following canaloplasty
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective analysis of the use of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% following canaloplasty
title_short A retrospective analysis of the use of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% following canaloplasty
title_sort retrospective analysis of the use of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.5% following canaloplasty
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29491705
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S153912
work_keys_str_mv AT khaimimahmouda aretrospectiveanalysisoftheuseofloteprednoletabonateophthalmicsuspension05followingcanaloplasty
AT khaimimahmouda retrospectiveanalysisoftheuseofloteprednoletabonateophthalmicsuspension05followingcanaloplasty