Cargando…

Effectiveness and durability of solifenacin versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus their combination for the treatment of women with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled study with a follow-up of ten months

PURPOSE: To assess effectiveness and durability of Solifenacin (SS) versus tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) versus combination therapy (PTNS + SS) in women with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 105 women with OAB were divided randomly into three groups of 35 patients each. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vecchioli-Scaldazza, Carlo, Morosetti, Carolina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29064651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0611
_version_ 1783300512479707136
author Vecchioli-Scaldazza, Carlo
Morosetti, Carolina
author_facet Vecchioli-Scaldazza, Carlo
Morosetti, Carolina
author_sort Vecchioli-Scaldazza, Carlo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess effectiveness and durability of Solifenacin (SS) versus tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) versus combination therapy (PTNS + SS) in women with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 105 women with OAB were divided randomly into three groups of 35 patients each. In group A women received SS, in group B women underwent PTNS, in group C women underwent combination of PTNS + SS. Improvements in OAB symptoms were assessed with OABSS questionnaire; patients’ quality of life was assessed with OAB-q SF questionnaire. Evaluation of effectiveness of treatments was performed with PGI-I questionnaire. OABSS and PGI-I were also assessed monthly for ten months. RESULTS: All treatments were effective on symptoms. PTNS showed a greater effectiveness than SS, but PTNS + SS was more effective than SS and PTNS. Furthermore, PTNS + SS showed a greater duration of effectiveness than PTNS and SS. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of PTNS with SS showed more effectiveness and more durability than PTNS and SS alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5815539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58155392018-02-22 Effectiveness and durability of solifenacin versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus their combination for the treatment of women with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled study with a follow-up of ten months Vecchioli-Scaldazza, Carlo Morosetti, Carolina Int Braz J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: To assess effectiveness and durability of Solifenacin (SS) versus tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) versus combination therapy (PTNS + SS) in women with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 105 women with OAB were divided randomly into three groups of 35 patients each. In group A women received SS, in group B women underwent PTNS, in group C women underwent combination of PTNS + SS. Improvements in OAB symptoms were assessed with OABSS questionnaire; patients’ quality of life was assessed with OAB-q SF questionnaire. Evaluation of effectiveness of treatments was performed with PGI-I questionnaire. OABSS and PGI-I were also assessed monthly for ten months. RESULTS: All treatments were effective on symptoms. PTNS showed a greater effectiveness than SS, but PTNS + SS was more effective than SS and PTNS. Furthermore, PTNS + SS showed a greater duration of effectiveness than PTNS and SS. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of PTNS with SS showed more effectiveness and more durability than PTNS and SS alone. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5815539/ /pubmed/29064651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0611 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vecchioli-Scaldazza, Carlo
Morosetti, Carolina
Effectiveness and durability of solifenacin versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus their combination for the treatment of women with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled study with a follow-up of ten months
title Effectiveness and durability of solifenacin versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus their combination for the treatment of women with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled study with a follow-up of ten months
title_full Effectiveness and durability of solifenacin versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus their combination for the treatment of women with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled study with a follow-up of ten months
title_fullStr Effectiveness and durability of solifenacin versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus their combination for the treatment of women with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled study with a follow-up of ten months
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and durability of solifenacin versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus their combination for the treatment of women with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled study with a follow-up of ten months
title_short Effectiveness and durability of solifenacin versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus their combination for the treatment of women with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled study with a follow-up of ten months
title_sort effectiveness and durability of solifenacin versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus their combination for the treatment of women with overactive bladder syndrome: a randomized controlled study with a follow-up of ten months
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29064651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0611
work_keys_str_mv AT vecchioliscaldazzacarlo effectivenessanddurabilityofsolifenacinversuspercutaneoustibialnervestimulationversustheircombinationforthetreatmentofwomenwithoveractivebladdersyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudywithafollowupoftenmonths
AT morosetticarolina effectivenessanddurabilityofsolifenacinversuspercutaneoustibialnervestimulationversustheircombinationforthetreatmentofwomenwithoveractivebladdersyndromearandomizedcontrolledstudywithafollowupoftenmonths