Cargando…

Comparison of rigid and deformable registration through the respiratory phases of four-dimensional computed tomography image data sets for radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the geometric differences in gross tumor volume (GTV) and surgical clips propagated by rigid image registration (RIR) and deformable image registration (DIR) using a four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) image data set for patients treated with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Aiping, Li, Jianbin, Qiu, Heng, Wang, Wei, Guo, Yanluan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29390317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000009143
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the geometric differences in gross tumor volume (GTV) and surgical clips propagated by rigid image registration (RIR) and deformable image registration (DIR) using a four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) image data set for patients treated with boost irradiation or accelerated partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS: The 4DCT data sets of 44 patients who had undergone BCS were acquired. GTV and selected clips were manually delineated on end-inhalation phase (CT(0)) and end-exhalation phase (CT(50)) images of 4DCT data sets. Subsequently, the GTV and selected clips from CT(0) images were transformed and propagated to CT(50) images using RIR and DIR, respectively. The geometric differences in GTV and surgical clips from DIR were compared with those of RIR. RESULTS: The mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) index was 0.860 ± 0.042 for RIR and 0.870 ± 0.040 for DIR for GTV (P = .000). The three-dimensional distance to the center of mass (COM) of the GTV from RIR was longer than that from DIR (1.22 mm and 1.10 mm, respectively, P = .000). Moreover, in the anterior–posterior direction, displacements from RIR were significantly greater than those from DIR for both GTV (0.70 mm and 0.50 mm, respectively) and selected clips (upper clip, 0.45 mm vs 0.20 mm; inner clip, 0.55 mm vs 0.30 mm; outer clip, 0.40 mm vs 0.20 mm; lower clip, 0.50 mm vs 0.25 mm) (P = .000). However, in the left–right and superior–inferior directions, there were no significant displacement differences between RIR and DIR for GTV and the selected clips (all P > .050). CONCLUSION: DIR can improve the overlap for GTV registration from CT(0) to CT(50) images from 4DCT scanning. Furthermore, DIR is superior to RIR in reflecting the displacement of GTV and selected clips in the anterior–posterior direction induced by respiratory movement.