Cargando…
An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli is a recognized zoonotic food-borne pathogen; however, the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the underdeveloped countries to differentiate pathogenic from non-pathogenic E. coli is a problematic issue. Our grail was to assess the phenotypic virulence markers motility, hemoly...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.05.002 |
_version_ | 1783300590064893952 |
---|---|
author | Osman, Kamelia M. Hessain, Ashgan M. Abo-shama, Usama H. Girh, Zeinab M. Kabli, Saleh A. Hemeg, Hassan A. Moussa, Ihab M. |
author_facet | Osman, Kamelia M. Hessain, Ashgan M. Abo-shama, Usama H. Girh, Zeinab M. Kabli, Saleh A. Hemeg, Hassan A. Moussa, Ihab M. |
author_sort | Osman, Kamelia M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Escherichia coli is a recognized zoonotic food-borne pathogen; however, the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the underdeveloped countries to differentiate pathogenic from non-pathogenic E. coli is a problematic issue. Our grail was to assess the phenotypic virulence markers motility, hemolysin, congo red agar, embryo lethality assay and serum resistance for pathogenic E. coli (PEC) correlated to PCR tests which is currently used world-wide to evaluate the PEC. The 448 strains of Escherichia coli that were isolated from different sources, were characterized for phenotypic virulence factors such as motility, hemolysin, Congo red binding, Embryo Lethality assay (ELA) and serum resistance, as well as antibiotic susceptibility using disc diffusion method to 23 antibiotics. Results exhibited 100% motility and Congo red binding, 97.1% for hemolysin production and 90.2% in the ELA. As a result, we were able to hypothetically conclude that the aforementioned virulence markers are plain, straightforward, economical, rapid, more dynamic, uncomplicated methodology, duplicatable and cost next to nothing when compared to the molecular PCR. Their implementation in a diagnostic microbiology laboratory for vetting is a rewarding task in the underdeveloped countries. It augments endeavors to minimize the use of PCR in our investigations especially during epidemiological and outbreak investigations of PEC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5815987 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58159872018-02-22 An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli Osman, Kamelia M. Hessain, Ashgan M. Abo-shama, Usama H. Girh, Zeinab M. Kabli, Saleh A. Hemeg, Hassan A. Moussa, Ihab M. Saudi J Biol Sci Article Escherichia coli is a recognized zoonotic food-borne pathogen; however, the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the underdeveloped countries to differentiate pathogenic from non-pathogenic E. coli is a problematic issue. Our grail was to assess the phenotypic virulence markers motility, hemolysin, congo red agar, embryo lethality assay and serum resistance for pathogenic E. coli (PEC) correlated to PCR tests which is currently used world-wide to evaluate the PEC. The 448 strains of Escherichia coli that were isolated from different sources, were characterized for phenotypic virulence factors such as motility, hemolysin, Congo red binding, Embryo Lethality assay (ELA) and serum resistance, as well as antibiotic susceptibility using disc diffusion method to 23 antibiotics. Results exhibited 100% motility and Congo red binding, 97.1% for hemolysin production and 90.2% in the ELA. As a result, we were able to hypothetically conclude that the aforementioned virulence markers are plain, straightforward, economical, rapid, more dynamic, uncomplicated methodology, duplicatable and cost next to nothing when compared to the molecular PCR. Their implementation in a diagnostic microbiology laboratory for vetting is a rewarding task in the underdeveloped countries. It augments endeavors to minimize the use of PCR in our investigations especially during epidemiological and outbreak investigations of PEC. Elsevier 2018-02 2017-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5815987/ /pubmed/29472764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.05.002 Text en © 2017 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Osman, Kamelia M. Hessain, Ashgan M. Abo-shama, Usama H. Girh, Zeinab M. Kabli, Saleh A. Hemeg, Hassan A. Moussa, Ihab M. An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli |
title | An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli |
title_full | An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli |
title_fullStr | An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli |
title_full_unstemmed | An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli |
title_short | An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli |
title_sort | alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic escherichia coli |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815987/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.05.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT osmankameliam analternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli AT hessainashganm analternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli AT aboshamausamah analternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli AT girhzeinabm analternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli AT kablisaleha analternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli AT hemeghassana analternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli AT moussaihabm analternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli AT osmankameliam alternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli AT hessainashganm alternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli AT aboshamausamah alternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli AT girhzeinabm alternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli AT kablisaleha alternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli AT hemeghassana alternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli AT moussaihabm alternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli |