Cargando…

An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli is a recognized zoonotic food-borne pathogen; however, the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the underdeveloped countries to differentiate pathogenic from non-pathogenic E. coli is a problematic issue. Our grail was to assess the phenotypic virulence markers motility, hemoly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Osman, Kamelia M., Hessain, Ashgan M., Abo-shama, Usama H., Girh, Zeinab M., Kabli, Saleh A., Hemeg, Hassan A., Moussa, Ihab M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.05.002
_version_ 1783300590064893952
author Osman, Kamelia M.
Hessain, Ashgan M.
Abo-shama, Usama H.
Girh, Zeinab M.
Kabli, Saleh A.
Hemeg, Hassan A.
Moussa, Ihab M.
author_facet Osman, Kamelia M.
Hessain, Ashgan M.
Abo-shama, Usama H.
Girh, Zeinab M.
Kabli, Saleh A.
Hemeg, Hassan A.
Moussa, Ihab M.
author_sort Osman, Kamelia M.
collection PubMed
description Escherichia coli is a recognized zoonotic food-borne pathogen; however, the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the underdeveloped countries to differentiate pathogenic from non-pathogenic E. coli is a problematic issue. Our grail was to assess the phenotypic virulence markers motility, hemolysin, congo red agar, embryo lethality assay and serum resistance for pathogenic E. coli (PEC) correlated to PCR tests which is currently used world-wide to evaluate the PEC. The 448 strains of Escherichia coli that were isolated from different sources, were characterized for phenotypic virulence factors such as motility, hemolysin, Congo red binding, Embryo Lethality assay (ELA) and serum resistance, as well as antibiotic susceptibility using disc diffusion method to 23 antibiotics. Results exhibited 100% motility and Congo red binding, 97.1% for hemolysin production and 90.2% in the ELA. As a result, we were able to hypothetically conclude that the aforementioned virulence markers are plain, straightforward, economical, rapid, more dynamic, uncomplicated methodology, duplicatable and cost next to nothing when compared to the molecular PCR. Their implementation in a diagnostic microbiology laboratory for vetting is a rewarding task in the underdeveloped countries. It augments endeavors to minimize the use of PCR in our investigations especially during epidemiological and outbreak investigations of PEC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5815987
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58159872018-02-22 An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli Osman, Kamelia M. Hessain, Ashgan M. Abo-shama, Usama H. Girh, Zeinab M. Kabli, Saleh A. Hemeg, Hassan A. Moussa, Ihab M. Saudi J Biol Sci Article Escherichia coli is a recognized zoonotic food-borne pathogen; however, the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the underdeveloped countries to differentiate pathogenic from non-pathogenic E. coli is a problematic issue. Our grail was to assess the phenotypic virulence markers motility, hemolysin, congo red agar, embryo lethality assay and serum resistance for pathogenic E. coli (PEC) correlated to PCR tests which is currently used world-wide to evaluate the PEC. The 448 strains of Escherichia coli that were isolated from different sources, were characterized for phenotypic virulence factors such as motility, hemolysin, Congo red binding, Embryo Lethality assay (ELA) and serum resistance, as well as antibiotic susceptibility using disc diffusion method to 23 antibiotics. Results exhibited 100% motility and Congo red binding, 97.1% for hemolysin production and 90.2% in the ELA. As a result, we were able to hypothetically conclude that the aforementioned virulence markers are plain, straightforward, economical, rapid, more dynamic, uncomplicated methodology, duplicatable and cost next to nothing when compared to the molecular PCR. Their implementation in a diagnostic microbiology laboratory for vetting is a rewarding task in the underdeveloped countries. It augments endeavors to minimize the use of PCR in our investigations especially during epidemiological and outbreak investigations of PEC. Elsevier 2018-02 2017-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5815987/ /pubmed/29472764 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.05.002 Text en © 2017 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Osman, Kamelia M.
Hessain, Ashgan M.
Abo-shama, Usama H.
Girh, Zeinab M.
Kabli, Saleh A.
Hemeg, Hassan A.
Moussa, Ihab M.
An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli
title An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli
title_full An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli
title_fullStr An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli
title_full_unstemmed An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli
title_short An alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic Escherichia coli
title_sort alternative approach for evaluating the phenotypic virulence factors of pathogenic escherichia coli
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5815987/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472764
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.05.002
work_keys_str_mv AT osmankameliam analternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli
AT hessainashganm analternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli
AT aboshamausamah analternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli
AT girhzeinabm analternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli
AT kablisaleha analternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli
AT hemeghassana analternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli
AT moussaihabm analternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli
AT osmankameliam alternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli
AT hessainashganm alternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli
AT aboshamausamah alternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli
AT girhzeinabm alternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli
AT kablisaleha alternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli
AT hemeghassana alternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli
AT moussaihabm alternativeapproachforevaluatingthephenotypicvirulencefactorsofpathogenicescherichiacoli