Cargando…
Open Notes in Swedish Psychiatric Care (Part 1): Survey Among Psychiatric Care Professionals
BACKGROUND: When the Swedish version of Open Notes, an electronic health record (EHR) service that allows patients online access, was introduced in hospitals, primary care, and specialized care in 2012, psychiatric care was exempt. This was because psychiatric notes were considered too sensitive for...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29396386 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.9140 |
_version_ | 1783300634346258432 |
---|---|
author | Petersson, Lena Erlingsdóttir, Gudbjörg |
author_facet | Petersson, Lena Erlingsdóttir, Gudbjörg |
author_sort | Petersson, Lena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: When the Swedish version of Open Notes, an electronic health record (EHR) service that allows patients online access, was introduced in hospitals, primary care, and specialized care in 2012, psychiatric care was exempt. This was because psychiatric notes were considered too sensitive for patient access. However, as the first region in Sweden, Region Skåne added adult psychiatry to its Open Notes service in 2015. This made it possible to carry out a unique baseline study to investigate how different health care professionals (HCPs) in adult psychiatric care in the region expect Open Notes to impact their patients and their practice. This is the first of two papers about the implementation of Open Notes in adult psychiatric care in Region Skåne. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe, compare, and discuss how different HCPs in adult psychiatric care in Region Skåne expect Open Notes to impact their patients and their own practice. METHODS: A full population Web-based questionnaire was distributed to psychiatric care professionals in Region Skåne in late 2015. The response rate was 28.86% (871/3017). Analyses show that the respondents were representative of the staff as a whole. A statistical analysis examined the relationships between different professionals and attitudes to the Open Notes service. RESULTS: The results show that the psychiatric HCPs are generally of the opinion that the service would affect their own practice and their patients negatively. The most striking result was that more than 60% of both doctors (80/132, 60.6%) and psychologists (55/90, 61%) were concerned that they would be less candid in their documentation in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Open Notes can increase the transparency between patients and psychiatric HCPs because patients are able to access their EHRs online without delay and thus, can read notes that have not yet been approved by the responsible HCP. This may be one explanation as to why HCPs are concerned that the service will affect both their own work and their patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5816262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58162622018-02-23 Open Notes in Swedish Psychiatric Care (Part 1): Survey Among Psychiatric Care Professionals Petersson, Lena Erlingsdóttir, Gudbjörg JMIR Ment Health Original Paper BACKGROUND: When the Swedish version of Open Notes, an electronic health record (EHR) service that allows patients online access, was introduced in hospitals, primary care, and specialized care in 2012, psychiatric care was exempt. This was because psychiatric notes were considered too sensitive for patient access. However, as the first region in Sweden, Region Skåne added adult psychiatry to its Open Notes service in 2015. This made it possible to carry out a unique baseline study to investigate how different health care professionals (HCPs) in adult psychiatric care in the region expect Open Notes to impact their patients and their practice. This is the first of two papers about the implementation of Open Notes in adult psychiatric care in Region Skåne. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe, compare, and discuss how different HCPs in adult psychiatric care in Region Skåne expect Open Notes to impact their patients and their own practice. METHODS: A full population Web-based questionnaire was distributed to psychiatric care professionals in Region Skåne in late 2015. The response rate was 28.86% (871/3017). Analyses show that the respondents were representative of the staff as a whole. A statistical analysis examined the relationships between different professionals and attitudes to the Open Notes service. RESULTS: The results show that the psychiatric HCPs are generally of the opinion that the service would affect their own practice and their patients negatively. The most striking result was that more than 60% of both doctors (80/132, 60.6%) and psychologists (55/90, 61%) were concerned that they would be less candid in their documentation in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Open Notes can increase the transparency between patients and psychiatric HCPs because patients are able to access their EHRs online without delay and thus, can read notes that have not yet been approved by the responsible HCP. This may be one explanation as to why HCPs are concerned that the service will affect both their own work and their patients. JMIR Publications 2018-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5816262/ /pubmed/29396386 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.9140 Text en ©Lena Petersson, Gudbjörg Erlingsdóttir. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 02.02.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Petersson, Lena Erlingsdóttir, Gudbjörg Open Notes in Swedish Psychiatric Care (Part 1): Survey Among Psychiatric Care Professionals |
title | Open Notes in Swedish Psychiatric Care (Part 1): Survey Among Psychiatric Care Professionals |
title_full | Open Notes in Swedish Psychiatric Care (Part 1): Survey Among Psychiatric Care Professionals |
title_fullStr | Open Notes in Swedish Psychiatric Care (Part 1): Survey Among Psychiatric Care Professionals |
title_full_unstemmed | Open Notes in Swedish Psychiatric Care (Part 1): Survey Among Psychiatric Care Professionals |
title_short | Open Notes in Swedish Psychiatric Care (Part 1): Survey Among Psychiatric Care Professionals |
title_sort | open notes in swedish psychiatric care (part 1): survey among psychiatric care professionals |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29396386 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mental.9140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peterssonlena opennotesinswedishpsychiatriccarepart1surveyamongpsychiatriccareprofessionals AT erlingsdottirgudbjorg opennotesinswedishpsychiatriccarepart1surveyamongpsychiatriccareprofessionals |