Cargando…

Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of lower pole (LP) approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). METHODS: One hundred thirty-two renal cancer patients were scheduled for selective retroperitoneal LRN. The surgery parameters an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Bo, Wang, Yuantao, Gao, Jialin, Zhang, Yongrui, Fu, Yaowen, An, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29454352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1324-7
_version_ 1783300654326874112
author Yuan, Bo
Wang, Yuantao
Gao, Jialin
Zhang, Yongrui
Fu, Yaowen
An, Wei
author_facet Yuan, Bo
Wang, Yuantao
Gao, Jialin
Zhang, Yongrui
Fu, Yaowen
An, Wei
author_sort Yuan, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of lower pole (LP) approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). METHODS: One hundred thirty-two renal cancer patients were scheduled for selective retroperitoneal LRN. The surgery parameters and outcomes were compared. Out of 132 patients, 78 (59.1%) patients underwent LRN via LP approach, while 54 (40.9%) patients underwent LRN via lateroposterior space (LPS) approach. RESULTS: Compared to LPS group, the LP group had a higher body mass index (27.0 ± 1.7 kg/m(2) vs. 24.5 ± 1.8 kg/m(2), P <  0.0001) and a larger tumor size (6.9 ± 3.5 cm vs. 4.1 ± 3.3 cm, P <  0.0001). The LP approach reduced the volumes of blood loss and transfusion significantly (135.3 ± 17.2 mL vs. 219.6 ± 30.9 mL, P <  0.0001; 55.6 ± 28.3 vs. 141.1 ± 50.4 mL, P <  0.0001) as compared to the LPS approach. The LP approach also decreased the risk of conversion to open procedure (1.3 vs. 7.4%, P <  0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The LP approach is an effective and safe alternative to the LPS approach for retroperitoneal LRN and might be more suitable for patients with obesity, large tumors, tumors located at the medial part of the kidney, or renal pedicular adhesion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5816350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58163502018-02-21 Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle Yuan, Bo Wang, Yuantao Gao, Jialin Zhang, Yongrui Fu, Yaowen An, Wei World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of lower pole (LP) approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). METHODS: One hundred thirty-two renal cancer patients were scheduled for selective retroperitoneal LRN. The surgery parameters and outcomes were compared. Out of 132 patients, 78 (59.1%) patients underwent LRN via LP approach, while 54 (40.9%) patients underwent LRN via lateroposterior space (LPS) approach. RESULTS: Compared to LPS group, the LP group had a higher body mass index (27.0 ± 1.7 kg/m(2) vs. 24.5 ± 1.8 kg/m(2), P <  0.0001) and a larger tumor size (6.9 ± 3.5 cm vs. 4.1 ± 3.3 cm, P <  0.0001). The LP approach reduced the volumes of blood loss and transfusion significantly (135.3 ± 17.2 mL vs. 219.6 ± 30.9 mL, P <  0.0001; 55.6 ± 28.3 vs. 141.1 ± 50.4 mL, P <  0.0001) as compared to the LPS approach. The LP approach also decreased the risk of conversion to open procedure (1.3 vs. 7.4%, P <  0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The LP approach is an effective and safe alternative to the LPS approach for retroperitoneal LRN and might be more suitable for patients with obesity, large tumors, tumors located at the medial part of the kidney, or renal pedicular adhesion. BioMed Central 2018-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5816350/ /pubmed/29454352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1324-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Yuan, Bo
Wang, Yuantao
Gao, Jialin
Zhang, Yongrui
Fu, Yaowen
An, Wei
Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
title Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
title_full Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
title_fullStr Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
title_full_unstemmed Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
title_short Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
title_sort lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29454352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1324-7
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanbo lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle
AT wangyuantao lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle
AT gaojialin lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle
AT zhangyongrui lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle
AT fuyaowen lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle
AT anwei lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle