Cargando…

Radiotherapy related skin toxicity (RAREST-01): Mepitel® film versus standard care in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present trial is to investigate a new option of skin protection in order to reduce the rate of grade ≥ 2 skin toxicity in patients receiving radiotherapy alone or radiochemotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head-and-neck (SCCHN). METHODS / DESIGN:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Narvaez, Carlos, Doemer, Claudia, Idel, Christian, Setter, Cornelia, Olbrich, Denise, Ujmajuridze, Zaza, Carl, Jesper Hansen, Rades, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29454311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4119-x
_version_ 1783300654574338048
author Narvaez, Carlos
Doemer, Claudia
Idel, Christian
Setter, Cornelia
Olbrich, Denise
Ujmajuridze, Zaza
Carl, Jesper Hansen
Rades, Dirk
author_facet Narvaez, Carlos
Doemer, Claudia
Idel, Christian
Setter, Cornelia
Olbrich, Denise
Ujmajuridze, Zaza
Carl, Jesper Hansen
Rades, Dirk
author_sort Narvaez, Carlos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the present trial is to investigate a new option of skin protection in order to reduce the rate of grade ≥ 2 skin toxicity in patients receiving radiotherapy alone or radiochemotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head-and-neck (SCCHN). METHODS / DESIGN: This is a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group multi-center trial that compares the following treatments of radiation dermatitis in patients with head-and-neck cancer: Mepitel® Film (Arm A) vs. standard care (Arm B). The primary aim of this trial is to investigate the rate of patients experiencing grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis (according to Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03) until 50 Gy of radiotherapy. Evaluation until 50 Gy of radiotherapy has been selected as the primary endpoint, since up to 50 Gy, the irradiated volume includes the primary tumor and the bilateral cervical and supraclavicular lymph nodes, and, therefore, is similar in all patients. After 50 Gy, irradiated volumes are very individual, depending on location and size of the primary tumor, involvement of lymph nodes, and the treatment approach (definitive vs. adjuvant). In addition, the following endpoints will be evaluated: Time to grade 2 radiation dermatitis until 50 Gy of radiotherapy, rate of patients experiencing grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis during radio(chemo)therapy, rate of patients experiencing grade ≥ 3 skin toxicity during radio(chemo)therapy, adverse events, quality of life, and dermatitis-related pain. Administration of Mepitel® Film will be considered to be clinically relevant, if the rate of grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis can be reduced from 85% to 65%. DISCUSSION: If administration of Mepitel® Film instead of standard care will be able to significantly reduce the rate of grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis, it could become the new standard of skin care in patients irradiated for SCCHN. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03047174. Registered on 26th of January, 2017. First patient included on 9th of May, 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5816351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58163512018-02-21 Radiotherapy related skin toxicity (RAREST-01): Mepitel® film versus standard care in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer Narvaez, Carlos Doemer, Claudia Idel, Christian Setter, Cornelia Olbrich, Denise Ujmajuridze, Zaza Carl, Jesper Hansen Rades, Dirk BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The aim of the present trial is to investigate a new option of skin protection in order to reduce the rate of grade ≥ 2 skin toxicity in patients receiving radiotherapy alone or radiochemotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head-and-neck (SCCHN). METHODS / DESIGN: This is a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group multi-center trial that compares the following treatments of radiation dermatitis in patients with head-and-neck cancer: Mepitel® Film (Arm A) vs. standard care (Arm B). The primary aim of this trial is to investigate the rate of patients experiencing grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis (according to Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03) until 50 Gy of radiotherapy. Evaluation until 50 Gy of radiotherapy has been selected as the primary endpoint, since up to 50 Gy, the irradiated volume includes the primary tumor and the bilateral cervical and supraclavicular lymph nodes, and, therefore, is similar in all patients. After 50 Gy, irradiated volumes are very individual, depending on location and size of the primary tumor, involvement of lymph nodes, and the treatment approach (definitive vs. adjuvant). In addition, the following endpoints will be evaluated: Time to grade 2 radiation dermatitis until 50 Gy of radiotherapy, rate of patients experiencing grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis during radio(chemo)therapy, rate of patients experiencing grade ≥ 3 skin toxicity during radio(chemo)therapy, adverse events, quality of life, and dermatitis-related pain. Administration of Mepitel® Film will be considered to be clinically relevant, if the rate of grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis can be reduced from 85% to 65%. DISCUSSION: If administration of Mepitel® Film instead of standard care will be able to significantly reduce the rate of grade ≥ 2 radiation dermatitis, it could become the new standard of skin care in patients irradiated for SCCHN. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03047174. Registered on 26th of January, 2017. First patient included on 9th of May, 2017. BioMed Central 2018-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5816351/ /pubmed/29454311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4119-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Narvaez, Carlos
Doemer, Claudia
Idel, Christian
Setter, Cornelia
Olbrich, Denise
Ujmajuridze, Zaza
Carl, Jesper Hansen
Rades, Dirk
Radiotherapy related skin toxicity (RAREST-01): Mepitel® film versus standard care in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer
title Radiotherapy related skin toxicity (RAREST-01): Mepitel® film versus standard care in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer
title_full Radiotherapy related skin toxicity (RAREST-01): Mepitel® film versus standard care in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer
title_fullStr Radiotherapy related skin toxicity (RAREST-01): Mepitel® film versus standard care in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer
title_full_unstemmed Radiotherapy related skin toxicity (RAREST-01): Mepitel® film versus standard care in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer
title_short Radiotherapy related skin toxicity (RAREST-01): Mepitel® film versus standard care in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer
title_sort radiotherapy related skin toxicity (rarest-01): mepitel® film versus standard care in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29454311
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4119-x
work_keys_str_mv AT narvaezcarlos radiotherapyrelatedskintoxicityrarest01mepitelfilmversusstandardcareinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancer
AT doemerclaudia radiotherapyrelatedskintoxicityrarest01mepitelfilmversusstandardcareinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancer
AT idelchristian radiotherapyrelatedskintoxicityrarest01mepitelfilmversusstandardcareinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancer
AT settercornelia radiotherapyrelatedskintoxicityrarest01mepitelfilmversusstandardcareinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancer
AT olbrichdenise radiotherapyrelatedskintoxicityrarest01mepitelfilmversusstandardcareinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancer
AT ujmajuridzezaza radiotherapyrelatedskintoxicityrarest01mepitelfilmversusstandardcareinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancer
AT carljesperhansen radiotherapyrelatedskintoxicityrarest01mepitelfilmversusstandardcareinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancer
AT radesdirk radiotherapyrelatedskintoxicityrarest01mepitelfilmversusstandardcareinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancer