Cargando…
Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE)
BACKGROUND: The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators tool (SPICT) supports the identification of patients with potential palliative care (PC) needs. An Austrian-German expert group translated SPICT into German (SPICT-DE) in 2014. The aim of this study was the systematic development, refinement,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29454343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0283-7 |
_version_ | 1783300663065706496 |
---|---|
author | Afshar, Kambiz Feichtner, Angelika Boyd, Kirsty Murray, Scott Jünger, Saskia Wiese, Birgitt Schneider, Nils Müller-Mundt, Gabriele |
author_facet | Afshar, Kambiz Feichtner, Angelika Boyd, Kirsty Murray, Scott Jünger, Saskia Wiese, Birgitt Schneider, Nils Müller-Mundt, Gabriele |
author_sort | Afshar, Kambiz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators tool (SPICT) supports the identification of patients with potential palliative care (PC) needs. An Austrian-German expert group translated SPICT into German (SPICT-DE) in 2014. The aim of this study was the systematic development, refinement, and testing of SPICT-DE for its application in primary care (general practice). METHODS: SPICT-DE was developed by a multiprofessional research team according to the TRAPD model: translation, review, adjudication, pretesting and documentation. In a pretest, five general practitioners (GPs) rated four case vignettes of patients with different PC needs. GPs were asked to assess whether each patient might benefit from PC or not (I) based on their subjective appraisal (“usual practice”) and (II) by using SPICT-DE. After further refinement, two focus groups with 28 GPs (68% with a further qualification in PC) were conducted to test SPICT-DE. Again, participants rated two selected case vignettes (I) based on their subjective appraisal and (II) by using SPICT-DE. Afterwards, participants reflected the suitability of SPICT-DE for use in their daily practice routine within the German primary care system. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests for small samples. Qualitative data were analysed by conventional content analysis. Focus group discussion was analysed combining formal and conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Compared to the spontaneous rating of the case vignettes based on subjective appraisal, participants in both the pretest and the focus groups considered PC more often as being beneficial for the patients described in the case vignettes when using SPICT-DE. Participants in the focus groups agreed that SPICT-DE includes all relevant indicators necessary for an adequate clinical identification of patients who might benefit from PC. CONCLUSIONS: SPICT-DE supports the identification of patients who might benefit from PC and seems suitable for routine application in general practice in Germany. The systematic development, refinement, and testing of SPICT-DE in this study was successfully completed by using a multiprofessional and participatory approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5816386 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58163862018-02-21 Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE) Afshar, Kambiz Feichtner, Angelika Boyd, Kirsty Murray, Scott Jünger, Saskia Wiese, Birgitt Schneider, Nils Müller-Mundt, Gabriele BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators tool (SPICT) supports the identification of patients with potential palliative care (PC) needs. An Austrian-German expert group translated SPICT into German (SPICT-DE) in 2014. The aim of this study was the systematic development, refinement, and testing of SPICT-DE for its application in primary care (general practice). METHODS: SPICT-DE was developed by a multiprofessional research team according to the TRAPD model: translation, review, adjudication, pretesting and documentation. In a pretest, five general practitioners (GPs) rated four case vignettes of patients with different PC needs. GPs were asked to assess whether each patient might benefit from PC or not (I) based on their subjective appraisal (“usual practice”) and (II) by using SPICT-DE. After further refinement, two focus groups with 28 GPs (68% with a further qualification in PC) were conducted to test SPICT-DE. Again, participants rated two selected case vignettes (I) based on their subjective appraisal and (II) by using SPICT-DE. Afterwards, participants reflected the suitability of SPICT-DE for use in their daily practice routine within the German primary care system. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests for small samples. Qualitative data were analysed by conventional content analysis. Focus group discussion was analysed combining formal and conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Compared to the spontaneous rating of the case vignettes based on subjective appraisal, participants in both the pretest and the focus groups considered PC more often as being beneficial for the patients described in the case vignettes when using SPICT-DE. Participants in the focus groups agreed that SPICT-DE includes all relevant indicators necessary for an adequate clinical identification of patients who might benefit from PC. CONCLUSIONS: SPICT-DE supports the identification of patients who might benefit from PC and seems suitable for routine application in general practice in Germany. The systematic development, refinement, and testing of SPICT-DE in this study was successfully completed by using a multiprofessional and participatory approach. BioMed Central 2018-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5816386/ /pubmed/29454343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0283-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Afshar, Kambiz Feichtner, Angelika Boyd, Kirsty Murray, Scott Jünger, Saskia Wiese, Birgitt Schneider, Nils Müller-Mundt, Gabriele Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE) |
title | Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE) |
title_full | Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE) |
title_fullStr | Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE) |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE) |
title_short | Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE) |
title_sort | systematic development and adjustment of the german version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool (spict-de) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816386/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29454343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0283-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT afsharkambiz systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde AT feichtnerangelika systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde AT boydkirsty systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde AT murrayscott systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde AT jungersaskia systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde AT wiesebirgitt systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde AT schneidernils systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde AT mullermundtgabriele systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde |