Cargando…

Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE)

BACKGROUND: The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators tool (SPICT) supports the identification of patients with potential palliative care (PC) needs. An Austrian-German expert group translated SPICT into German (SPICT-DE) in 2014. The aim of this study was the systematic development, refinement,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Afshar, Kambiz, Feichtner, Angelika, Boyd, Kirsty, Murray, Scott, Jünger, Saskia, Wiese, Birgitt, Schneider, Nils, Müller-Mundt, Gabriele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29454343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0283-7
_version_ 1783300663065706496
author Afshar, Kambiz
Feichtner, Angelika
Boyd, Kirsty
Murray, Scott
Jünger, Saskia
Wiese, Birgitt
Schneider, Nils
Müller-Mundt, Gabriele
author_facet Afshar, Kambiz
Feichtner, Angelika
Boyd, Kirsty
Murray, Scott
Jünger, Saskia
Wiese, Birgitt
Schneider, Nils
Müller-Mundt, Gabriele
author_sort Afshar, Kambiz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators tool (SPICT) supports the identification of patients with potential palliative care (PC) needs. An Austrian-German expert group translated SPICT into German (SPICT-DE) in 2014. The aim of this study was the systematic development, refinement, and testing of SPICT-DE for its application in primary care (general practice). METHODS: SPICT-DE was developed by a multiprofessional research team according to the TRAPD model: translation, review, adjudication, pretesting and documentation. In a pretest, five general practitioners (GPs) rated four case vignettes of patients with different PC needs. GPs were asked to assess whether each patient might benefit from PC or not (I) based on their subjective appraisal (“usual practice”) and (II) by using SPICT-DE. After further refinement, two focus groups with 28 GPs (68% with a further qualification in PC) were conducted to test SPICT-DE. Again, participants rated two selected case vignettes (I) based on their subjective appraisal and (II) by using SPICT-DE. Afterwards, participants reflected the suitability of SPICT-DE for use in their daily practice routine within the German primary care system. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests for small samples. Qualitative data were analysed by conventional content analysis. Focus group discussion was analysed combining formal and conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Compared to the spontaneous rating of the case vignettes based on subjective appraisal, participants in both the pretest and the focus groups considered PC more often as being beneficial for the patients described in the case vignettes when using SPICT-DE. Participants in the focus groups agreed that SPICT-DE includes all relevant indicators necessary for an adequate clinical identification of patients who might benefit from PC. CONCLUSIONS: SPICT-DE supports the identification of patients who might benefit from PC and seems suitable for routine application in general practice in Germany. The systematic development, refinement, and testing of SPICT-DE in this study was successfully completed by using a multiprofessional and participatory approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5816386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58163862018-02-21 Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE) Afshar, Kambiz Feichtner, Angelika Boyd, Kirsty Murray, Scott Jünger, Saskia Wiese, Birgitt Schneider, Nils Müller-Mundt, Gabriele BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators tool (SPICT) supports the identification of patients with potential palliative care (PC) needs. An Austrian-German expert group translated SPICT into German (SPICT-DE) in 2014. The aim of this study was the systematic development, refinement, and testing of SPICT-DE for its application in primary care (general practice). METHODS: SPICT-DE was developed by a multiprofessional research team according to the TRAPD model: translation, review, adjudication, pretesting and documentation. In a pretest, five general practitioners (GPs) rated four case vignettes of patients with different PC needs. GPs were asked to assess whether each patient might benefit from PC or not (I) based on their subjective appraisal (“usual practice”) and (II) by using SPICT-DE. After further refinement, two focus groups with 28 GPs (68% with a further qualification in PC) were conducted to test SPICT-DE. Again, participants rated two selected case vignettes (I) based on their subjective appraisal and (II) by using SPICT-DE. Afterwards, participants reflected the suitability of SPICT-DE for use in their daily practice routine within the German primary care system. Quantitative data were analysed with descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests for small samples. Qualitative data were analysed by conventional content analysis. Focus group discussion was analysed combining formal and conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Compared to the spontaneous rating of the case vignettes based on subjective appraisal, participants in both the pretest and the focus groups considered PC more often as being beneficial for the patients described in the case vignettes when using SPICT-DE. Participants in the focus groups agreed that SPICT-DE includes all relevant indicators necessary for an adequate clinical identification of patients who might benefit from PC. CONCLUSIONS: SPICT-DE supports the identification of patients who might benefit from PC and seems suitable for routine application in general practice in Germany. The systematic development, refinement, and testing of SPICT-DE in this study was successfully completed by using a multiprofessional and participatory approach. BioMed Central 2018-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5816386/ /pubmed/29454343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0283-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Afshar, Kambiz
Feichtner, Angelika
Boyd, Kirsty
Murray, Scott
Jünger, Saskia
Wiese, Birgitt
Schneider, Nils
Müller-Mundt, Gabriele
Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE)
title Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE)
title_full Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE)
title_fullStr Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE)
title_full_unstemmed Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE)
title_short Systematic development and adjustment of the German version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT-DE)
title_sort systematic development and adjustment of the german version of the supportive and palliative care indicators tool (spict-de)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29454343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0283-7
work_keys_str_mv AT afsharkambiz systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde
AT feichtnerangelika systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde
AT boydkirsty systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde
AT murrayscott systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde
AT jungersaskia systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde
AT wiesebirgitt systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde
AT schneidernils systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde
AT mullermundtgabriele systematicdevelopmentandadjustmentofthegermanversionofthesupportiveandpalliativecareindicatorstoolspictde