Cargando…

7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with bloodstream infection: a pilot randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Shorter-duration antibiotic treatment is sufficient for a range of bacterial infections, but has not been adequately studied for bloodstream infections. Our systematic review, survey, and observational study indicated equipoise for a trial of 7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daneman, Nick, Rishu, Asgar H., Pinto, Ruxandra, Aslanian, Pierre, Bagshaw, Sean M., Carignan, Alex, Charbonney, Emmanuel, Coburn, Bryan, Cook, Deborah J., Detsky, Michael E., Dodek, Peter, Hall, Richard, Kumar, Anand, Lamontagne, Francois, Lauzier, Francois, Marshall, John C., Martin, Claudio M., McIntyre, Lauralyn, Muscedere, John, Reynolds, Steven, Sligl, Wendy, Stelfox, Henry T., Wilcox, M. Elizabeth, Fowler, Robert A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29452598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2474-1
_version_ 1783300666256523264
author Daneman, Nick
Rishu, Asgar H.
Pinto, Ruxandra
Aslanian, Pierre
Bagshaw, Sean M.
Carignan, Alex
Charbonney, Emmanuel
Coburn, Bryan
Cook, Deborah J.
Detsky, Michael E.
Dodek, Peter
Hall, Richard
Kumar, Anand
Lamontagne, Francois
Lauzier, Francois
Marshall, John C.
Martin, Claudio M.
McIntyre, Lauralyn
Muscedere, John
Reynolds, Steven
Sligl, Wendy
Stelfox, Henry T.
Wilcox, M. Elizabeth
Fowler, Robert A.
author_facet Daneman, Nick
Rishu, Asgar H.
Pinto, Ruxandra
Aslanian, Pierre
Bagshaw, Sean M.
Carignan, Alex
Charbonney, Emmanuel
Coburn, Bryan
Cook, Deborah J.
Detsky, Michael E.
Dodek, Peter
Hall, Richard
Kumar, Anand
Lamontagne, Francois
Lauzier, Francois
Marshall, John C.
Martin, Claudio M.
McIntyre, Lauralyn
Muscedere, John
Reynolds, Steven
Sligl, Wendy
Stelfox, Henry T.
Wilcox, M. Elizabeth
Fowler, Robert A.
author_sort Daneman, Nick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shorter-duration antibiotic treatment is sufficient for a range of bacterial infections, but has not been adequately studied for bloodstream infections. Our systematic review, survey, and observational study indicated equipoise for a trial of 7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment for bloodstream infections; a pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT) was a necessary next step to assess feasibility of a larger trial. METHODS: We conducted an open, pilot RCT of antibiotic treatment duration among critically ill patients with bloodstream infection across 11 intensive care units (ICUs). Antibiotic selection, dosing and route were at the discretion of the treating team; patients were randomized 1:1 to intervention arms consisting of two fixed durations of treatment – 7 versus 14 days. We recruited adults with a positive blood culture yielding pathogenic bacteria identified while in ICU. We excluded patients with severe immunosuppression, foci of infection with an established requirement for prolonged treatment, single cultures with potential contaminants, or cultures yielding Staphylococcus aureus or fungi. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate and adherence to treatment duration protocol. Secondary outcomes included 90-day, ICU and hospital mortality, relapse of bacteremia, lengths of stay, mechanical ventilation and vasopressor duration, antibiotic-free days, Clostridium difficile, antibiotic adverse events, and secondary infection with antimicrobial-resistant organisms. RESULTS: We successfully achieved our target sample size (n = 115) and average recruitment rate of 1 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.3–1.5) patient/ICU/month. Adherence to treatment duration was achieved in 89/115 (77%) patients. Adherence differed by underlying source of infection: 26/31 (84%) lung; 18/29 (62%) intra-abdominal; 20/26 (77%) urinary tract; 8/9 (89%) vascular-catheter; 4/4 (100%) skin/soft tissue; 2/4 (50%) other; and 11/12 (92%) unknown sources. Patients experienced a median (IQR) 14 (8–17) antibiotic-free days (of the 28 days after blood culture collection). Antimicrobial-related adverse events included hepatitis in 1 (1%) patient, Clostridium difficile infection in 4 (4%), and secondary infection with highly resistant microorganisms in 10 (9%). Ascertainment was complete for all study outcomes in ICU, in hospital and at 90 days. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to conduct a RCT to determine whether 7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment is associated with comparable 90-day survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02261506. Registered on 26 September 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2474-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5816399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58163992018-02-21 7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with bloodstream infection: a pilot randomized clinical trial Daneman, Nick Rishu, Asgar H. Pinto, Ruxandra Aslanian, Pierre Bagshaw, Sean M. Carignan, Alex Charbonney, Emmanuel Coburn, Bryan Cook, Deborah J. Detsky, Michael E. Dodek, Peter Hall, Richard Kumar, Anand Lamontagne, Francois Lauzier, Francois Marshall, John C. Martin, Claudio M. McIntyre, Lauralyn Muscedere, John Reynolds, Steven Sligl, Wendy Stelfox, Henry T. Wilcox, M. Elizabeth Fowler, Robert A. Trials Research BACKGROUND: Shorter-duration antibiotic treatment is sufficient for a range of bacterial infections, but has not been adequately studied for bloodstream infections. Our systematic review, survey, and observational study indicated equipoise for a trial of 7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment for bloodstream infections; a pilot randomized clinical trial (RCT) was a necessary next step to assess feasibility of a larger trial. METHODS: We conducted an open, pilot RCT of antibiotic treatment duration among critically ill patients with bloodstream infection across 11 intensive care units (ICUs). Antibiotic selection, dosing and route were at the discretion of the treating team; patients were randomized 1:1 to intervention arms consisting of two fixed durations of treatment – 7 versus 14 days. We recruited adults with a positive blood culture yielding pathogenic bacteria identified while in ICU. We excluded patients with severe immunosuppression, foci of infection with an established requirement for prolonged treatment, single cultures with potential contaminants, or cultures yielding Staphylococcus aureus or fungi. The primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate and adherence to treatment duration protocol. Secondary outcomes included 90-day, ICU and hospital mortality, relapse of bacteremia, lengths of stay, mechanical ventilation and vasopressor duration, antibiotic-free days, Clostridium difficile, antibiotic adverse events, and secondary infection with antimicrobial-resistant organisms. RESULTS: We successfully achieved our target sample size (n = 115) and average recruitment rate of 1 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.3–1.5) patient/ICU/month. Adherence to treatment duration was achieved in 89/115 (77%) patients. Adherence differed by underlying source of infection: 26/31 (84%) lung; 18/29 (62%) intra-abdominal; 20/26 (77%) urinary tract; 8/9 (89%) vascular-catheter; 4/4 (100%) skin/soft tissue; 2/4 (50%) other; and 11/12 (92%) unknown sources. Patients experienced a median (IQR) 14 (8–17) antibiotic-free days (of the 28 days after blood culture collection). Antimicrobial-related adverse events included hepatitis in 1 (1%) patient, Clostridium difficile infection in 4 (4%), and secondary infection with highly resistant microorganisms in 10 (9%). Ascertainment was complete for all study outcomes in ICU, in hospital and at 90 days. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to conduct a RCT to determine whether 7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment is associated with comparable 90-day survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02261506. Registered on 26 September 2014. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2474-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5816399/ /pubmed/29452598 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2474-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Daneman, Nick
Rishu, Asgar H.
Pinto, Ruxandra
Aslanian, Pierre
Bagshaw, Sean M.
Carignan, Alex
Charbonney, Emmanuel
Coburn, Bryan
Cook, Deborah J.
Detsky, Michael E.
Dodek, Peter
Hall, Richard
Kumar, Anand
Lamontagne, Francois
Lauzier, Francois
Marshall, John C.
Martin, Claudio M.
McIntyre, Lauralyn
Muscedere, John
Reynolds, Steven
Sligl, Wendy
Stelfox, Henry T.
Wilcox, M. Elizabeth
Fowler, Robert A.
7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with bloodstream infection: a pilot randomized clinical trial
title 7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with bloodstream infection: a pilot randomized clinical trial
title_full 7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with bloodstream infection: a pilot randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr 7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with bloodstream infection: a pilot randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed 7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with bloodstream infection: a pilot randomized clinical trial
title_short 7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with bloodstream infection: a pilot randomized clinical trial
title_sort 7 versus 14 days of antibiotic treatment for critically ill patients with bloodstream infection: a pilot randomized clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29452598
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2474-1
work_keys_str_mv AT danemannick 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT rishuasgarh 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pintoruxandra 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT aslanianpierre 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT bagshawseanm 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT carignanalex 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT charbonneyemmanuel 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT coburnbryan 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT cookdeborahj 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT detskymichaele 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT dodekpeter 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT hallrichard 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kumaranand 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT lamontagnefrancois 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT lauzierfrancois 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT marshalljohnc 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT martinclaudiom 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mcintyrelauralyn 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT muscederejohn 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT reynoldssteven 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT sliglwendy 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT stelfoxhenryt 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT wilcoxmelizabeth 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fowlerroberta 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT 7versus14daysofantibiotictreatmentforcriticallyillpatientswithbloodstreaminfectionapilotrandomizedclinicaltrial