Cargando…

Agrobacterium-mediated and electroporation-mediated transformation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: a comparative study

BACKGROUND: Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is an unicellular green alga used for functional genomics studies and heterologous protein expression. A major hindrance in these studies is the low level and instability of expression of nuclear transgenes, due to their rearrangement and/or silencing over time....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mini, Paola, Demurtas, Olivia Costantina, Valentini, Silvia, Pallara, Patrizia, Aprea, Giuseppe, Ferrante, Paola, Giuliano, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29454346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12896-018-0416-3
_version_ 1783300697854312448
author Mini, Paola
Demurtas, Olivia Costantina
Valentini, Silvia
Pallara, Patrizia
Aprea, Giuseppe
Ferrante, Paola
Giuliano, Giovanni
author_facet Mini, Paola
Demurtas, Olivia Costantina
Valentini, Silvia
Pallara, Patrizia
Aprea, Giuseppe
Ferrante, Paola
Giuliano, Giovanni
author_sort Mini, Paola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is an unicellular green alga used for functional genomics studies and heterologous protein expression. A major hindrance in these studies is the low level and instability of expression of nuclear transgenes, due to their rearrangement and/or silencing over time. RESULTS: We constructed dedicated vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation carrying, within the T-DNA borders, the Paromomycin (Paro) selectable marker and an expression cassette containing the Luciferase (Luc) reporter gene. These vectors and newly developed co-cultivation methods were used to compare the efficiency, stability and insertion sites of Agrobacterium- versus electroporation-mediated transformation. The influence of different transformation methods, of the cell wall, of the virulence of different Agrobacterium strains, and of transgene orientation with respect to T-DNA borders were assessed. False positive transformants were more frequent in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation compared to electroporation, compensating for the slightly lower proportion of silenced transformants observed in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation than in electroporation. The proportion of silenced transformants remained stable after 20 cycles of subculture in selective medium. Next generation sequencing confirmed the nuclear insertion points, which occurred in exons or untraslated regions (UTRs) for 10 out of 10 Agrobacterium-mediated and 9 out of 13 of electroporation-mediated insertions. Electroporation also resulted in higher numbers of insertions at multiple loci. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its labor-intensive nature, Agrobacterium transformation of Chlamydomonas does not present significant advantages over electroporation, with the possible exception of its use in insertional mutagenesis, due to the higher proportion of within-gene, single-locus insertions. Our data indirectly support the hypothesis that rearrangement of transforming DNA occurs in the Chlamydomonas cell, rather than in the extracellular space as previously proposed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12896-018-0416-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5816537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58165372018-02-21 Agrobacterium-mediated and electroporation-mediated transformation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: a comparative study Mini, Paola Demurtas, Olivia Costantina Valentini, Silvia Pallara, Patrizia Aprea, Giuseppe Ferrante, Paola Giuliano, Giovanni BMC Biotechnol Research Article BACKGROUND: Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is an unicellular green alga used for functional genomics studies and heterologous protein expression. A major hindrance in these studies is the low level and instability of expression of nuclear transgenes, due to their rearrangement and/or silencing over time. RESULTS: We constructed dedicated vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation carrying, within the T-DNA borders, the Paromomycin (Paro) selectable marker and an expression cassette containing the Luciferase (Luc) reporter gene. These vectors and newly developed co-cultivation methods were used to compare the efficiency, stability and insertion sites of Agrobacterium- versus electroporation-mediated transformation. The influence of different transformation methods, of the cell wall, of the virulence of different Agrobacterium strains, and of transgene orientation with respect to T-DNA borders were assessed. False positive transformants were more frequent in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation compared to electroporation, compensating for the slightly lower proportion of silenced transformants observed in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation than in electroporation. The proportion of silenced transformants remained stable after 20 cycles of subculture in selective medium. Next generation sequencing confirmed the nuclear insertion points, which occurred in exons or untraslated regions (UTRs) for 10 out of 10 Agrobacterium-mediated and 9 out of 13 of electroporation-mediated insertions. Electroporation also resulted in higher numbers of insertions at multiple loci. CONCLUSIONS: Due to its labor-intensive nature, Agrobacterium transformation of Chlamydomonas does not present significant advantages over electroporation, with the possible exception of its use in insertional mutagenesis, due to the higher proportion of within-gene, single-locus insertions. Our data indirectly support the hypothesis that rearrangement of transforming DNA occurs in the Chlamydomonas cell, rather than in the extracellular space as previously proposed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12896-018-0416-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5816537/ /pubmed/29454346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12896-018-0416-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mini, Paola
Demurtas, Olivia Costantina
Valentini, Silvia
Pallara, Patrizia
Aprea, Giuseppe
Ferrante, Paola
Giuliano, Giovanni
Agrobacterium-mediated and electroporation-mediated transformation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: a comparative study
title Agrobacterium-mediated and electroporation-mediated transformation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: a comparative study
title_full Agrobacterium-mediated and electroporation-mediated transformation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: a comparative study
title_fullStr Agrobacterium-mediated and electroporation-mediated transformation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: a comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Agrobacterium-mediated and electroporation-mediated transformation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: a comparative study
title_short Agrobacterium-mediated and electroporation-mediated transformation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii: a comparative study
title_sort agrobacterium-mediated and electroporation-mediated transformation of chlamydomonas reinhardtii: a comparative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29454346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12896-018-0416-3
work_keys_str_mv AT minipaola agrobacteriummediatedandelectroporationmediatedtransformationofchlamydomonasreinhardtiiacomparativestudy
AT demurtasoliviacostantina agrobacteriummediatedandelectroporationmediatedtransformationofchlamydomonasreinhardtiiacomparativestudy
AT valentinisilvia agrobacteriummediatedandelectroporationmediatedtransformationofchlamydomonasreinhardtiiacomparativestudy
AT pallarapatrizia agrobacteriummediatedandelectroporationmediatedtransformationofchlamydomonasreinhardtiiacomparativestudy
AT apreagiuseppe agrobacteriummediatedandelectroporationmediatedtransformationofchlamydomonasreinhardtiiacomparativestudy
AT ferrantepaola agrobacteriummediatedandelectroporationmediatedtransformationofchlamydomonasreinhardtiiacomparativestudy
AT giulianogiovanni agrobacteriummediatedandelectroporationmediatedtransformationofchlamydomonasreinhardtiiacomparativestudy