Cargando…

Clinical implications of rapid ePlex® Respiratory Pathogen Panel testing compared to laboratory-developed real-time PCR

Rapid diagnosis of respiratory infections is of great importance for adequate isolation and treatment. Due to the batch-wise testing, laboratory-developed real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays (LDT) often result in a time to result of one day. Here, LDT was compared with rapid ePlex® Resp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	van Rijn, Anneloes L., Nijhuis, Roel H. T., Bekker, Vincent, Groeneveld, Geert H., Wessels, Els, Feltkamp, Mariet C. W., Claas, Eric C. J.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816761/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29222697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-3151-0

Ejemplares similares

Comparison of ePlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel with Laboratory-Developed Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection of Respiratory Pathogens
por: Nijhuis, R. H. T., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Evaluation of the ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels for Detection of Pathogens in Bloodstream Infections
por: Huang, Te-Din, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Evaluation of the Genmark ePlex® and QIAstat-Dx® respiratory pathogen panels in detecting bacterial targets in lower respiratory tract specimens
por: van Asten, Suzanne A. V., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Multicenter Evaluation of the ePlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel for the Detection of Viral and Bacterial Respiratory Tract Pathogens in Nasopharyngeal Swabs
por: Babady, N. Esther, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

359. The Clinical Utility of the GenMark Dx ePlex® Fungal Blood Culture Identification Panel
por: Carmona, Stefania, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Clinical Performance of the Novel GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture ID Gram-Positive Panel
por: Carroll, Karen C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

214. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Negative Panel
por: Meeder, Jeremy, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

200. Prospective Evaluation of the GenMark Dx ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Gram Positive Panel
por: Meeder, Jeremy, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

164. Performance of ePlex® Blood Culture Identification Panels in Clinical Isolates and Characterization of Antimicrobial Stewardship Opportunities
por: Thomas, Jenni, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

2174. Comparison of the Verigene® and the ePlex® Blood Culture Identification Panels for Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections
por: Johnson, J Kristie, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Evaluation of point of care testing platform (ePLEX) for respiratory viral diagnosis
por: Guerendiain, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

285. Evaluation of the ePlex® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panels for Gram-positive/Gram-negative bacteria and yeasts
por: Chapin, Kimberle, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of Microbiological Performance and the Potential Clinical Impact of the ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Panels for the Rapid Diagnosis of Bacteremia and Fungemia
por: Bryant, Sabrina, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Test Performance and Potential Clinical Utility of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel
por: McCarty, T. P., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

653. Comparison of Yeasts identification by Biofire, Culture and ePlex for Quality Assurance purpose
por: lin, jeffrey, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A Closer Look at the Laboratory Impact of Utilizing ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels: a Workflow Analysis Using Rapid Molecular Detection for Positive Blood Cultures
por: Tansarli, Giannoula S., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel
por: Wolk, Donna M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The impact of GenMark Dx ePlex blood-culture identification on the treatment and outcomes of gram-positive bacteremia
por: Kiszla, B. Matthew, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

False-negative detection of respiratory syncytial virus as an example that regular update of RT-PCR is required for reliable molecular detection of respiratory viruses
por: Wessels, Els, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

82. Assessment of Clinical Outcomes and Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns Following Implementation of the GenMark ePlex(®) Blood Culture Identification Panel for Gram-positive Bloodstream Infections
por: Wein, Megan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

1022. Evaluating the Impact of GenMark Dx ePlex® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) on Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections
por: Cumagun, Pia, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Human Polyomavirus Middle and Alternative T-Antigens; Thoughts on Roles and Relevance to Cancer
por: van der Meijden, Els, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

1027. Earlier Is Better: Progress Toward Decreased Time to Optimal Therapy and Improved Antibiotic Stewardship for Gram-positive Bloodstream Infections Through Use of GenMark Dx ePlex system
por: White, Cameron, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

To PLEX or Not to PLEX for Amiodarone-Induced Thyrotoxicosis
por: Ahuja, Tania, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

MuPlex: multi-objective multiplex PCR assay design
por: Rachlin, John, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Impact of HPyV9 and TSPyV coinfection on the development of BK polyomavirus viremia and associated nephropathy after kidney transplantation
por: van Rijn, Aline L., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The respiratory virome and exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
por: van Rijn, Anneloes L., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Performance of the QIAstat-Dx Gastrointestinal Panel for Diagnosing Infectious Gastroenteritis
por: Boers, Stefan A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Seroprevalence of fourteen human polyomaviruses determined in blood donors
por: Kamminga, Sergio, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A 124-plex Microhaplotype Panel Based on Next-generation Sequencing Developed for Forensic Applications
por: Pang, Jing-Bo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Internal validation of an improved system for forensic application: a 41-plex Y-STR panel
por: Chai, Siyu, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Development and Validation of a Panel of One-Step Four-Plex qPCR/RT-qPCR Assays for Simultaneous Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and Other Pathogens Associated with Canine Infectious Respiratory Disease Complex
por: Thieulent, Côme J., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Serology Identifies LIPyV as a Feline Rather than a Human Polyomavirus
por: Kamminga, Sergio, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

P402 Comparison of PCR-RFLP with 21-plex PCR and rDNA: sequencing for identification of clinical yeast isolates
por: Khodavaisy, Sadegh, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Prevalence of DNA of fourteen human polyomaviruses determined in blood donors
por: Kamminga, Sergio, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A six‐plex droplet digital RT‐PCR assay for seasonal influenza virus typing, subtyping, and lineage determination
por: Leong, Nathaniel K. C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A novel 5-Plex qPCR-HRM assay detecting human diarrheal parasites
por: Lamien-Meda, Aline, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

PlexProbes enhance qPCR multiplexing by discriminating multiple targets in each fluorescent channel
por: Hasick, Nicole, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Molecular Characterization of Genital and Extragenital Lesions With the PlexPCR VHS Assay in Patients Diagnosed With Syphilis
por: Eguiluz, Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Applicability of human-specific STR systems, GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit, Investigator 24plex QS Kit, and PowerPlex® Fusion 6C in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes)
por: Singh, Abhishek, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_n39hgq0c75anu1crai55mm1crc