Cargando…

Scaffolds for Pelvic Floor Prolapse: Logical Pathways

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has borrowed principles of treatment from hernia repair and in the last two decades we saw reinforcement materials to treat POP with good outcomes in terms of anatomy but with alarming complication rates. Polypropylene meshes to specifically treat POP have been withdrawn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bissoli, Julio, Bruschini, Homero
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29483927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8040893
_version_ 1783300764409528320
author Bissoli, Julio
Bruschini, Homero
author_facet Bissoli, Julio
Bruschini, Homero
author_sort Bissoli, Julio
collection PubMed
description Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has borrowed principles of treatment from hernia repair and in the last two decades we saw reinforcement materials to treat POP with good outcomes in terms of anatomy but with alarming complication rates. Polypropylene meshes to specifically treat POP have been withdrawn from market by manufactures and a blank space was left to be filled with new materials. Macroporous monofilament meshes are ideal candidates and electrospinning emerged as a reliable method capable of delivering production reproducibility and customization. In this review, we point out some pathways that seem logical to be followed but have been only researched in last couple of years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5816858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58168582018-02-26 Scaffolds for Pelvic Floor Prolapse: Logical Pathways Bissoli, Julio Bruschini, Homero Int J Biomater Review Article Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has borrowed principles of treatment from hernia repair and in the last two decades we saw reinforcement materials to treat POP with good outcomes in terms of anatomy but with alarming complication rates. Polypropylene meshes to specifically treat POP have been withdrawn from market by manufactures and a blank space was left to be filled with new materials. Macroporous monofilament meshes are ideal candidates and electrospinning emerged as a reliable method capable of delivering production reproducibility and customization. In this review, we point out some pathways that seem logical to be followed but have been only researched in last couple of years. Hindawi 2018-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5816858/ /pubmed/29483927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8040893 Text en Copyright © 2018 Julio Bissoli and Homero Bruschini. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Bissoli, Julio
Bruschini, Homero
Scaffolds for Pelvic Floor Prolapse: Logical Pathways
title Scaffolds for Pelvic Floor Prolapse: Logical Pathways
title_full Scaffolds for Pelvic Floor Prolapse: Logical Pathways
title_fullStr Scaffolds for Pelvic Floor Prolapse: Logical Pathways
title_full_unstemmed Scaffolds for Pelvic Floor Prolapse: Logical Pathways
title_short Scaffolds for Pelvic Floor Prolapse: Logical Pathways
title_sort scaffolds for pelvic floor prolapse: logical pathways
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29483927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8040893
work_keys_str_mv AT bissolijulio scaffoldsforpelvicfloorprolapselogicalpathways
AT bruschinihomero scaffoldsforpelvicfloorprolapselogicalpathways