Cargando…

Validity of oral fluid test for Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in drivers using the 2013 National Roadside Survey Data

BACKGROUND: Driving under the influence of marijuana is a serious traffic safety concern in the United States. Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the main active compound in marijuana. Although blood THC testing is a more accurate measure of THC-induced impairment, measuring THC in oral fluid is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jin, Huiyan, Williams, Sharifa Z., Chihuri, Stanford T., Li, Guohua, Chen, Qixuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5817052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29457201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-018-0134-2
_version_ 1783300796441427968
author Jin, Huiyan
Williams, Sharifa Z.
Chihuri, Stanford T.
Li, Guohua
Chen, Qixuan
author_facet Jin, Huiyan
Williams, Sharifa Z.
Chihuri, Stanford T.
Li, Guohua
Chen, Qixuan
author_sort Jin, Huiyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Driving under the influence of marijuana is a serious traffic safety concern in the United States. Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the main active compound in marijuana. Although blood THC testing is a more accurate measure of THC-induced impairment, measuring THC in oral fluid is a less intrusive and less costly method of testing. METHODS: We examined whether the oral fluid THC test can be used as a valid alternative to the blood THC test using a sensitivity and specificity analysis and a logistic regression, and estimate the quantitative relationship between oral fluid THC concentration and blood THC concentration using a correlation analysis and a linear regression on the log-transformed THC concentrations. We used data from 4596 drivers who participated in the 2013 National Roadside Survey of Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers and for whom THC testing results from both oral fluid and whole blood samples were available. RESULTS: Overall, 8.9% and 9.4% of the participants tested positive for THC in oral fluid and whole blood samples, respectively. Using blood test as the reference criterion, oral fluid test for THC positivity showed a sensitivity of 79.4% (95% CI: 75.2%, 83.1%) and a specificity of 98.3% (95% CI: 97.9%, 98.7%). The log-transformed oral fluid THC concentration accounted for about 29% of the variation in the log-transformed blood THC concentration. That is, there is still 71% of the variation in the log-transformed blood THC concentration unexplained by the log-transformed oral fluid THC concentration. Back-transforming to the original scale, we estimated that each 10% increase in the oral fluid THC concentration was associated with a 2.4% (95% CI: 2.1%, 2.8%) increase in the blood THC concentration. CONCLUSIONS: The oral fluid test is a highly valid method for detecting the presence of THC in the blood but cannot be used to accurately measure the blood THC concentration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5817052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58170522018-02-27 Validity of oral fluid test for Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in drivers using the 2013 National Roadside Survey Data Jin, Huiyan Williams, Sharifa Z. Chihuri, Stanford T. Li, Guohua Chen, Qixuan Inj Epidemiol Original Contribution BACKGROUND: Driving under the influence of marijuana is a serious traffic safety concern in the United States. Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the main active compound in marijuana. Although blood THC testing is a more accurate measure of THC-induced impairment, measuring THC in oral fluid is a less intrusive and less costly method of testing. METHODS: We examined whether the oral fluid THC test can be used as a valid alternative to the blood THC test using a sensitivity and specificity analysis and a logistic regression, and estimate the quantitative relationship between oral fluid THC concentration and blood THC concentration using a correlation analysis and a linear regression on the log-transformed THC concentrations. We used data from 4596 drivers who participated in the 2013 National Roadside Survey of Alcohol and Drug Use by Drivers and for whom THC testing results from both oral fluid and whole blood samples were available. RESULTS: Overall, 8.9% and 9.4% of the participants tested positive for THC in oral fluid and whole blood samples, respectively. Using blood test as the reference criterion, oral fluid test for THC positivity showed a sensitivity of 79.4% (95% CI: 75.2%, 83.1%) and a specificity of 98.3% (95% CI: 97.9%, 98.7%). The log-transformed oral fluid THC concentration accounted for about 29% of the variation in the log-transformed blood THC concentration. That is, there is still 71% of the variation in the log-transformed blood THC concentration unexplained by the log-transformed oral fluid THC concentration. Back-transforming to the original scale, we estimated that each 10% increase in the oral fluid THC concentration was associated with a 2.4% (95% CI: 2.1%, 2.8%) increase in the blood THC concentration. CONCLUSIONS: The oral fluid test is a highly valid method for detecting the presence of THC in the blood but cannot be used to accurately measure the blood THC concentration. Springer International Publishing 2018-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5817052/ /pubmed/29457201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-018-0134-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Jin, Huiyan
Williams, Sharifa Z.
Chihuri, Stanford T.
Li, Guohua
Chen, Qixuan
Validity of oral fluid test for Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in drivers using the 2013 National Roadside Survey Data
title Validity of oral fluid test for Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in drivers using the 2013 National Roadside Survey Data
title_full Validity of oral fluid test for Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in drivers using the 2013 National Roadside Survey Data
title_fullStr Validity of oral fluid test for Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in drivers using the 2013 National Roadside Survey Data
title_full_unstemmed Validity of oral fluid test for Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in drivers using the 2013 National Roadside Survey Data
title_short Validity of oral fluid test for Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in drivers using the 2013 National Roadside Survey Data
title_sort validity of oral fluid test for delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in drivers using the 2013 national roadside survey data
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5817052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29457201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-018-0134-2
work_keys_str_mv AT jinhuiyan validityoforalfluidtestfordelta9tetrahydrocannabinolindriversusingthe2013nationalroadsidesurveydata
AT williamssharifaz validityoforalfluidtestfordelta9tetrahydrocannabinolindriversusingthe2013nationalroadsidesurveydata
AT chihuristanfordt validityoforalfluidtestfordelta9tetrahydrocannabinolindriversusingthe2013nationalroadsidesurveydata
AT liguohua validityoforalfluidtestfordelta9tetrahydrocannabinolindriversusingthe2013nationalroadsidesurveydata
AT chenqixuan validityoforalfluidtestfordelta9tetrahydrocannabinolindriversusingthe2013nationalroadsidesurveydata