Cargando…

Wrong, but useful: regional species distribution models may not be improved by range‐wide data under biased sampling

Species distribution modeling (SDM) is an essential method in ecology and conservation. SDMs are often calibrated within one country's borders, typically along a limited environmental gradient with biased and incomplete data, making the quality of these models questionable. In this study, we ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El‐Gabbas, Ahmed, Dormann, Carsten F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5817152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29468036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3834
_version_ 1783300820412923904
author El‐Gabbas, Ahmed
Dormann, Carsten F.
author_facet El‐Gabbas, Ahmed
Dormann, Carsten F.
author_sort El‐Gabbas, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description Species distribution modeling (SDM) is an essential method in ecology and conservation. SDMs are often calibrated within one country's borders, typically along a limited environmental gradient with biased and incomplete data, making the quality of these models questionable. In this study, we evaluated how adequate are national presence‐only data for calibrating regional SDMs. We trained SDMs for Egyptian bat species at two different scales: only within Egypt and at a species‐specific global extent. We used two modeling algorithms: Maxent and elastic net, both under the point‐process modeling framework. For each modeling algorithm, we measured the congruence of the predictions of global and regional models for Egypt, assuming that the lower the congruence, the lower the appropriateness of the Egyptian dataset to describe the species' niche. We inspected the effect of incorporating predictions from global models as additional predictor (“prior”) to regional models, and quantified the improvement in terms of AUC and the congruence between regional models run with and without priors. Moreover, we analyzed predictive performance improvements after correction for sampling bias at both scales. On average, predictions from global and regional models in Egypt only weakly concur. Collectively, the use of priors did not lead to much improvement: similar AUC and high congruence between regional models calibrated with and without priors. Correction for sampling bias led to higher model performance, whatever prior used, making the use of priors less pronounced. Under biased and incomplete sampling, the use of global bats data did not improve regional model performance. Without enough bias‐free regional data, we cannot objectively identify the actual improvement of regional models after incorporating information from the global niche. However, we still believe in great potential for global model predictions to guide future surveys and improve regional sampling in data‐poor regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5817152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58171522018-02-21 Wrong, but useful: regional species distribution models may not be improved by range‐wide data under biased sampling El‐Gabbas, Ahmed Dormann, Carsten F. Ecol Evol Original Research Species distribution modeling (SDM) is an essential method in ecology and conservation. SDMs are often calibrated within one country's borders, typically along a limited environmental gradient with biased and incomplete data, making the quality of these models questionable. In this study, we evaluated how adequate are national presence‐only data for calibrating regional SDMs. We trained SDMs for Egyptian bat species at two different scales: only within Egypt and at a species‐specific global extent. We used two modeling algorithms: Maxent and elastic net, both under the point‐process modeling framework. For each modeling algorithm, we measured the congruence of the predictions of global and regional models for Egypt, assuming that the lower the congruence, the lower the appropriateness of the Egyptian dataset to describe the species' niche. We inspected the effect of incorporating predictions from global models as additional predictor (“prior”) to regional models, and quantified the improvement in terms of AUC and the congruence between regional models run with and without priors. Moreover, we analyzed predictive performance improvements after correction for sampling bias at both scales. On average, predictions from global and regional models in Egypt only weakly concur. Collectively, the use of priors did not lead to much improvement: similar AUC and high congruence between regional models calibrated with and without priors. Correction for sampling bias led to higher model performance, whatever prior used, making the use of priors less pronounced. Under biased and incomplete sampling, the use of global bats data did not improve regional model performance. Without enough bias‐free regional data, we cannot objectively identify the actual improvement of regional models after incorporating information from the global niche. However, we still believe in great potential for global model predictions to guide future surveys and improve regional sampling in data‐poor regions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5817152/ /pubmed/29468036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3834 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
El‐Gabbas, Ahmed
Dormann, Carsten F.
Wrong, but useful: regional species distribution models may not be improved by range‐wide data under biased sampling
title Wrong, but useful: regional species distribution models may not be improved by range‐wide data under biased sampling
title_full Wrong, but useful: regional species distribution models may not be improved by range‐wide data under biased sampling
title_fullStr Wrong, but useful: regional species distribution models may not be improved by range‐wide data under biased sampling
title_full_unstemmed Wrong, but useful: regional species distribution models may not be improved by range‐wide data under biased sampling
title_short Wrong, but useful: regional species distribution models may not be improved by range‐wide data under biased sampling
title_sort wrong, but useful: regional species distribution models may not be improved by range‐wide data under biased sampling
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5817152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29468036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3834
work_keys_str_mv AT elgabbasahmed wrongbutusefulregionalspeciesdistributionmodelsmaynotbeimprovedbyrangewidedataunderbiasedsampling
AT dormanncarstenf wrongbutusefulregionalspeciesdistributionmodelsmaynotbeimprovedbyrangewidedataunderbiasedsampling