Cargando…

Place learning overrides innate behaviors in Drosophila

Animals in a natural environment confront many sensory cues. Some of these cues bias behavioral decisions independent of experience, and action selection can reveal a stimulus–response (S–R) connection. However, in a changing environment it would be a benefit for an animal to update behavioral actio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baggett, Vincent, Mishra, Aditi, Kehrer, Abigail L., Robinson, Abbey O., Shaw, Paul, Zars, Troy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5817280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29449456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.046136.117
_version_ 1783300843987009536
author Baggett, Vincent
Mishra, Aditi
Kehrer, Abigail L.
Robinson, Abbey O.
Shaw, Paul
Zars, Troy
author_facet Baggett, Vincent
Mishra, Aditi
Kehrer, Abigail L.
Robinson, Abbey O.
Shaw, Paul
Zars, Troy
author_sort Baggett, Vincent
collection PubMed
description Animals in a natural environment confront many sensory cues. Some of these cues bias behavioral decisions independent of experience, and action selection can reveal a stimulus–response (S–R) connection. However, in a changing environment it would be a benefit for an animal to update behavioral action selection based on experience, and learning might modify even strong S–R relationships. How animals use learning to modify S–R relationships is a largely open question. Three sensory stimuli, air, light, and gravity sources were presented to individual Drosophila melanogaster in both naïve and place conditioning situations. Flies were tested for a potential modification of the S–R relationships of anemotaxis, phototaxis, and negative gravitaxis by a contingency that associated place with high temperature. With two stimuli, significant S–R relationships were abandoned when the cue was in conflict with the place learning contingency. The role of the dunce (dnc) cAMP-phosphodiesterase and the rutabaga (rut) adenylyl cyclase were examined in all conditions. Both dnc(1) and rut(2080) mutant flies failed to display significant S–R relationships with two attractive cues, and have characteristically lower conditioning scores under most conditions. Thus, learning can have profound effects on separate native S–R relationships in multiple contexts, and mutation of the dnc and rut genes reveal complex effects on behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5817280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58172802019-03-01 Place learning overrides innate behaviors in Drosophila Baggett, Vincent Mishra, Aditi Kehrer, Abigail L. Robinson, Abbey O. Shaw, Paul Zars, Troy Learn Mem Research Animals in a natural environment confront many sensory cues. Some of these cues bias behavioral decisions independent of experience, and action selection can reveal a stimulus–response (S–R) connection. However, in a changing environment it would be a benefit for an animal to update behavioral action selection based on experience, and learning might modify even strong S–R relationships. How animals use learning to modify S–R relationships is a largely open question. Three sensory stimuli, air, light, and gravity sources were presented to individual Drosophila melanogaster in both naïve and place conditioning situations. Flies were tested for a potential modification of the S–R relationships of anemotaxis, phototaxis, and negative gravitaxis by a contingency that associated place with high temperature. With two stimuli, significant S–R relationships were abandoned when the cue was in conflict with the place learning contingency. The role of the dunce (dnc) cAMP-phosphodiesterase and the rutabaga (rut) adenylyl cyclase were examined in all conditions. Both dnc(1) and rut(2080) mutant flies failed to display significant S–R relationships with two attractive cues, and have characteristically lower conditioning scores under most conditions. Thus, learning can have profound effects on separate native S–R relationships in multiple contexts, and mutation of the dnc and rut genes reveal complex effects on behavior. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5817280/ /pubmed/29449456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.046136.117 Text en © 2018 Baggett et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://learnmem.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Baggett, Vincent
Mishra, Aditi
Kehrer, Abigail L.
Robinson, Abbey O.
Shaw, Paul
Zars, Troy
Place learning overrides innate behaviors in Drosophila
title Place learning overrides innate behaviors in Drosophila
title_full Place learning overrides innate behaviors in Drosophila
title_fullStr Place learning overrides innate behaviors in Drosophila
title_full_unstemmed Place learning overrides innate behaviors in Drosophila
title_short Place learning overrides innate behaviors in Drosophila
title_sort place learning overrides innate behaviors in drosophila
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5817280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29449456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/lm.046136.117
work_keys_str_mv AT baggettvincent placelearningoverridesinnatebehaviorsindrosophila
AT mishraaditi placelearningoverridesinnatebehaviorsindrosophila
AT kehrerabigaill placelearningoverridesinnatebehaviorsindrosophila
AT robinsonabbeyo placelearningoverridesinnatebehaviorsindrosophila
AT shawpaul placelearningoverridesinnatebehaviorsindrosophila
AT zarstroy placelearningoverridesinnatebehaviorsindrosophila