Cargando…

Comparative Analyses of Data Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometric Approaches: DIA, WiSIM‐DIA, and Untargeted DIA

Data‐independent acquisition (DIA) is an emerging technology for quantitative proteomics. Current DIA focusses on the identification and quantitation of fragment ions that are generated from multiple peptides contained in the same selection window of several to tens of m/z. An alternative approach i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koopmans, Frank, Ho, Jenny T. C., Smit, August B., Li, Ka Wan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5817406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29134766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201700304
_version_ 1783300872701214720
author Koopmans, Frank
Ho, Jenny T. C.
Smit, August B.
Li, Ka Wan
author_facet Koopmans, Frank
Ho, Jenny T. C.
Smit, August B.
Li, Ka Wan
author_sort Koopmans, Frank
collection PubMed
description Data‐independent acquisition (DIA) is an emerging technology for quantitative proteomics. Current DIA focusses on the identification and quantitation of fragment ions that are generated from multiple peptides contained in the same selection window of several to tens of m/z. An alternative approach is WiSIM‐DIA, which combines conventional DIA with wide‐SIM (wide selected‐ion monitoring) windows to partition the precursor m/z space to produce high‐quality precursor ion chromatograms. However, WiSIM‐DIA has been underexplored; it remains unclear if it is a viable alternative to DIA. We demonstrate that WiSIM‐DIA quantified more than 24 000 unique peptides over five orders of magnitude in a single 2 h analysis of a neuronal synapse‐enriched fraction, compared to 31 000 in DIA. There is a strong correlation between abundance values of peptides quantified in both the DIA and WiSIM‐DIA datasets. Interestingly, the S/N ratio of these peptides is not correlated. We further show that peptide identification directly from DIA spectra identified >2000 proteins, which included unique peptides not found in spectral libraries generated by DDA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5817406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58174062018-02-26 Comparative Analyses of Data Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometric Approaches: DIA, WiSIM‐DIA, and Untargeted DIA Koopmans, Frank Ho, Jenny T. C. Smit, August B. Li, Ka Wan Proteomics Technology Data‐independent acquisition (DIA) is an emerging technology for quantitative proteomics. Current DIA focusses on the identification and quantitation of fragment ions that are generated from multiple peptides contained in the same selection window of several to tens of m/z. An alternative approach is WiSIM‐DIA, which combines conventional DIA with wide‐SIM (wide selected‐ion monitoring) windows to partition the precursor m/z space to produce high‐quality precursor ion chromatograms. However, WiSIM‐DIA has been underexplored; it remains unclear if it is a viable alternative to DIA. We demonstrate that WiSIM‐DIA quantified more than 24 000 unique peptides over five orders of magnitude in a single 2 h analysis of a neuronal synapse‐enriched fraction, compared to 31 000 in DIA. There is a strong correlation between abundance values of peptides quantified in both the DIA and WiSIM‐DIA datasets. Interestingly, the S/N ratio of these peptides is not correlated. We further show that peptide identification directly from DIA spectra identified >2000 proteins, which included unique peptides not found in spectral libraries generated by DDA. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-15 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5817406/ /pubmed/29134766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201700304 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Proteomics Published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technology
Koopmans, Frank
Ho, Jenny T. C.
Smit, August B.
Li, Ka Wan
Comparative Analyses of Data Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometric Approaches: DIA, WiSIM‐DIA, and Untargeted DIA
title Comparative Analyses of Data Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometric Approaches: DIA, WiSIM‐DIA, and Untargeted DIA
title_full Comparative Analyses of Data Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometric Approaches: DIA, WiSIM‐DIA, and Untargeted DIA
title_fullStr Comparative Analyses of Data Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometric Approaches: DIA, WiSIM‐DIA, and Untargeted DIA
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analyses of Data Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometric Approaches: DIA, WiSIM‐DIA, and Untargeted DIA
title_short Comparative Analyses of Data Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometric Approaches: DIA, WiSIM‐DIA, and Untargeted DIA
title_sort comparative analyses of data independent acquisition mass spectrometric approaches: dia, wisim‐dia, and untargeted dia
topic Technology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5817406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29134766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201700304
work_keys_str_mv AT koopmansfrank comparativeanalysesofdataindependentacquisitionmassspectrometricapproachesdiawisimdiaanduntargeteddia
AT hojennytc comparativeanalysesofdataindependentacquisitionmassspectrometricapproachesdiawisimdiaanduntargeteddia
AT smitaugustb comparativeanalysesofdataindependentacquisitionmassspectrometricapproachesdiawisimdiaanduntargeteddia
AT likawan comparativeanalysesofdataindependentacquisitionmassspectrometricapproachesdiawisimdiaanduntargeteddia