Cargando…
Optimization of an RNA-Seq Differential Gene Expression Analysis Depending on Biological Replicate Number and Library Size
RNA-Seq is a widely used technology that allows an efficient genome-wide quantification of gene expressions for, for example, differential expression (DE) analysis. After a brief review of the main issues, methods and tools related to the DE analysis of RNA-Seq data, this article focuses on the impa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5817962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29491871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00108 |
_version_ | 1783300956630286336 |
---|---|
author | Lamarre, Sophie Frasse, Pierre Zouine, Mohamed Labourdette, Delphine Sainderichin, Elise Hu, Guojian Le Berre-Anton, Véronique Bouzayen, Mondher Maza, Elie |
author_facet | Lamarre, Sophie Frasse, Pierre Zouine, Mohamed Labourdette, Delphine Sainderichin, Elise Hu, Guojian Le Berre-Anton, Véronique Bouzayen, Mondher Maza, Elie |
author_sort | Lamarre, Sophie |
collection | PubMed |
description | RNA-Seq is a widely used technology that allows an efficient genome-wide quantification of gene expressions for, for example, differential expression (DE) analysis. After a brief review of the main issues, methods and tools related to the DE analysis of RNA-Seq data, this article focuses on the impact of both the replicate number and library size in such analyses. While the main drawback of previous relevant studies is the lack of generality, we conducted both an analysis of a two-condition experiment (with eight biological replicates per condition) to compare the results with previous benchmark studies, and a meta-analysis of 17 experiments with up to 18 biological conditions, eight biological replicates and 100 million (M) reads per sample. As a global trend, we concluded that the replicate number has a larger impact than the library size on the power of the DE analysis, except for low-expressed genes, for which both parameters seem to have the same impact. Our study also provides new insights for practitioners aiming to enhance their experimental designs. For instance, by analyzing both the sensitivity and specificity of the DE analysis, we showed that the optimal threshold to control the false discovery rate (FDR) is approximately 2(−r), where r is the replicate number. Furthermore, we showed that the false positive rate (FPR) is rather well controlled by all three studied R packages: DESeq, DESeq2, and edgeR. We also analyzed the impact of both the replicate number and library size on gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis. Interestingly, we concluded that increases in the replicate number and library size tend to enhance the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of the GO analysis. Finally, we recommend to RNA-Seq practitioners the production of a pilot data set to strictly analyze the power of their experimental design, or the use of a public data set, which should be similar to the data set they will obtain. For individuals working on tomato research, on the basis of the meta-analysis, we recommend at least four biological replicates per condition and 20 M reads per sample to be almost sure of obtaining about 1000 DE genes if they exist. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5817962 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58179622018-02-28 Optimization of an RNA-Seq Differential Gene Expression Analysis Depending on Biological Replicate Number and Library Size Lamarre, Sophie Frasse, Pierre Zouine, Mohamed Labourdette, Delphine Sainderichin, Elise Hu, Guojian Le Berre-Anton, Véronique Bouzayen, Mondher Maza, Elie Front Plant Sci Plant Science RNA-Seq is a widely used technology that allows an efficient genome-wide quantification of gene expressions for, for example, differential expression (DE) analysis. After a brief review of the main issues, methods and tools related to the DE analysis of RNA-Seq data, this article focuses on the impact of both the replicate number and library size in such analyses. While the main drawback of previous relevant studies is the lack of generality, we conducted both an analysis of a two-condition experiment (with eight biological replicates per condition) to compare the results with previous benchmark studies, and a meta-analysis of 17 experiments with up to 18 biological conditions, eight biological replicates and 100 million (M) reads per sample. As a global trend, we concluded that the replicate number has a larger impact than the library size on the power of the DE analysis, except for low-expressed genes, for which both parameters seem to have the same impact. Our study also provides new insights for practitioners aiming to enhance their experimental designs. For instance, by analyzing both the sensitivity and specificity of the DE analysis, we showed that the optimal threshold to control the false discovery rate (FDR) is approximately 2(−r), where r is the replicate number. Furthermore, we showed that the false positive rate (FPR) is rather well controlled by all three studied R packages: DESeq, DESeq2, and edgeR. We also analyzed the impact of both the replicate number and library size on gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis. Interestingly, we concluded that increases in the replicate number and library size tend to enhance the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of the GO analysis. Finally, we recommend to RNA-Seq practitioners the production of a pilot data set to strictly analyze the power of their experimental design, or the use of a public data set, which should be similar to the data set they will obtain. For individuals working on tomato research, on the basis of the meta-analysis, we recommend at least four biological replicates per condition and 20 M reads per sample to be almost sure of obtaining about 1000 DE genes if they exist. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5817962/ /pubmed/29491871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00108 Text en Copyright © 2018 Lamarre, Frasse, Zouine, Labourdette, Sainderichin, Hu, Le Berre-Anton, Bouzayen and Maza. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Lamarre, Sophie Frasse, Pierre Zouine, Mohamed Labourdette, Delphine Sainderichin, Elise Hu, Guojian Le Berre-Anton, Véronique Bouzayen, Mondher Maza, Elie Optimization of an RNA-Seq Differential Gene Expression Analysis Depending on Biological Replicate Number and Library Size |
title | Optimization of an RNA-Seq Differential Gene Expression Analysis Depending on Biological Replicate Number and Library Size |
title_full | Optimization of an RNA-Seq Differential Gene Expression Analysis Depending on Biological Replicate Number and Library Size |
title_fullStr | Optimization of an RNA-Seq Differential Gene Expression Analysis Depending on Biological Replicate Number and Library Size |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimization of an RNA-Seq Differential Gene Expression Analysis Depending on Biological Replicate Number and Library Size |
title_short | Optimization of an RNA-Seq Differential Gene Expression Analysis Depending on Biological Replicate Number and Library Size |
title_sort | optimization of an rna-seq differential gene expression analysis depending on biological replicate number and library size |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5817962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29491871 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lamarresophie optimizationofanrnaseqdifferentialgeneexpressionanalysisdependingonbiologicalreplicatenumberandlibrarysize AT frassepierre optimizationofanrnaseqdifferentialgeneexpressionanalysisdependingonbiologicalreplicatenumberandlibrarysize AT zouinemohamed optimizationofanrnaseqdifferentialgeneexpressionanalysisdependingonbiologicalreplicatenumberandlibrarysize AT labourdettedelphine optimizationofanrnaseqdifferentialgeneexpressionanalysisdependingonbiologicalreplicatenumberandlibrarysize AT sainderichinelise optimizationofanrnaseqdifferentialgeneexpressionanalysisdependingonbiologicalreplicatenumberandlibrarysize AT huguojian optimizationofanrnaseqdifferentialgeneexpressionanalysisdependingonbiologicalreplicatenumberandlibrarysize AT leberreantonveronique optimizationofanrnaseqdifferentialgeneexpressionanalysisdependingonbiologicalreplicatenumberandlibrarysize AT bouzayenmondher optimizationofanrnaseqdifferentialgeneexpressionanalysisdependingonbiologicalreplicatenumberandlibrarysize AT mazaelie optimizationofanrnaseqdifferentialgeneexpressionanalysisdependingonbiologicalreplicatenumberandlibrarysize |