Cargando…

Assessing gaps in cholesterol treatment guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease based on available randomised clinical trial evidence: The Rotterdam Study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine how American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2013 and European Society of Cardiology 2016 guidelines for the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) compare in reflecting the totality of accr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pavlović, Jelena, Greenland, Philip, Deckers, Jaap W, Kavousi, Maryam, Hofman, Albert, Ikram, M Arfan, Franco, Oscar H, Leening, Maarten JG
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29171772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2047487317743352
_version_ 1783300962899722240
author Pavlović, Jelena
Greenland, Philip
Deckers, Jaap W
Kavousi, Maryam
Hofman, Albert
Ikram, M Arfan
Franco, Oscar H
Leening, Maarten JG
author_facet Pavlović, Jelena
Greenland, Philip
Deckers, Jaap W
Kavousi, Maryam
Hofman, Albert
Ikram, M Arfan
Franco, Oscar H
Leening, Maarten JG
author_sort Pavlović, Jelena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine how American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2013 and European Society of Cardiology 2016 guidelines for the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) compare in reflecting the totality of accrued randomised clinical trial evidence for statin treatment at population level. METHODS: From 1997–2008, 7279 participants aged 45–75 years, free of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, from the population-based Rotterdam Study were included. For each participant, we compared eligibility for each one of 11 randomised clinical trials on statin use in primary prevention of CVD, with recommendations on lipid-lowering therapy from the ACC/AHA and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease incidence and cardiovascular disease mortality rates were calculated. RESULTS: The proportion of participants eligible for each trial ranged from 0.4% for ALLHAT-LLT to 30.8% for MEGA. The likelihood of being recommended for lipid-lowering treatment was lowest for those eligible for low-to-intermediate risk RCTs (HOPE-3, MEGA, and JUPITER), and highest for high-risk individuals with diabetes (MRC/BHF HPS, CARDS, and ASPEN) or elderly PROSPER. Eligibility for an increasing number of randomised clinical trials correlated with a greater likelihood of being recommended lipid-lowering treatment by either guideline (p < 0.001 for both guidelines). CONCLUSION: Compared to RCTs done in high risk populations, randomised clinical trials targeting low-to-intermediate risk populations are less well-reflected in the ACC/AHA, and even less so in the ESC guideline recommendations. Importantly, the low-to-intermediate risk population targeted by HOPE-3, the most recent randomised clinical trial in this field, is not well-captured by the current European prevention guidelines and should be specifically considered in future iterations of the guidelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5818030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58180302018-03-01 Assessing gaps in cholesterol treatment guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease based on available randomised clinical trial evidence: The Rotterdam Study Pavlović, Jelena Greenland, Philip Deckers, Jaap W Kavousi, Maryam Hofman, Albert Ikram, M Arfan Franco, Oscar H Leening, Maarten JG Eur J Prev Cardiol Prevention BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine how American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) 2013 and European Society of Cardiology 2016 guidelines for the primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) compare in reflecting the totality of accrued randomised clinical trial evidence for statin treatment at population level. METHODS: From 1997–2008, 7279 participants aged 45–75 years, free of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, from the population-based Rotterdam Study were included. For each participant, we compared eligibility for each one of 11 randomised clinical trials on statin use in primary prevention of CVD, with recommendations on lipid-lowering therapy from the ACC/AHA and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease incidence and cardiovascular disease mortality rates were calculated. RESULTS: The proportion of participants eligible for each trial ranged from 0.4% for ALLHAT-LLT to 30.8% for MEGA. The likelihood of being recommended for lipid-lowering treatment was lowest for those eligible for low-to-intermediate risk RCTs (HOPE-3, MEGA, and JUPITER), and highest for high-risk individuals with diabetes (MRC/BHF HPS, CARDS, and ASPEN) or elderly PROSPER. Eligibility for an increasing number of randomised clinical trials correlated with a greater likelihood of being recommended lipid-lowering treatment by either guideline (p < 0.001 for both guidelines). CONCLUSION: Compared to RCTs done in high risk populations, randomised clinical trials targeting low-to-intermediate risk populations are less well-reflected in the ACC/AHA, and even less so in the ESC guideline recommendations. Importantly, the low-to-intermediate risk population targeted by HOPE-3, the most recent randomised clinical trial in this field, is not well-captured by the current European prevention guidelines and should be specifically considered in future iterations of the guidelines. SAGE Publications 2017-11-24 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5818030/ /pubmed/29171772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2047487317743352 Text en © The European Society of Cardiology 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Prevention
Pavlović, Jelena
Greenland, Philip
Deckers, Jaap W
Kavousi, Maryam
Hofman, Albert
Ikram, M Arfan
Franco, Oscar H
Leening, Maarten JG
Assessing gaps in cholesterol treatment guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease based on available randomised clinical trial evidence: The Rotterdam Study
title Assessing gaps in cholesterol treatment guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease based on available randomised clinical trial evidence: The Rotterdam Study
title_full Assessing gaps in cholesterol treatment guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease based on available randomised clinical trial evidence: The Rotterdam Study
title_fullStr Assessing gaps in cholesterol treatment guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease based on available randomised clinical trial evidence: The Rotterdam Study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing gaps in cholesterol treatment guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease based on available randomised clinical trial evidence: The Rotterdam Study
title_short Assessing gaps in cholesterol treatment guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease based on available randomised clinical trial evidence: The Rotterdam Study
title_sort assessing gaps in cholesterol treatment guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease based on available randomised clinical trial evidence: the rotterdam study
topic Prevention
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29171772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2047487317743352
work_keys_str_mv AT pavlovicjelena assessinggapsincholesteroltreatmentguidelinesforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasebasedonavailablerandomisedclinicaltrialevidencetherotterdamstudy
AT greenlandphilip assessinggapsincholesteroltreatmentguidelinesforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasebasedonavailablerandomisedclinicaltrialevidencetherotterdamstudy
AT deckersjaapw assessinggapsincholesteroltreatmentguidelinesforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasebasedonavailablerandomisedclinicaltrialevidencetherotterdamstudy
AT kavousimaryam assessinggapsincholesteroltreatmentguidelinesforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasebasedonavailablerandomisedclinicaltrialevidencetherotterdamstudy
AT hofmanalbert assessinggapsincholesteroltreatmentguidelinesforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasebasedonavailablerandomisedclinicaltrialevidencetherotterdamstudy
AT ikrammarfan assessinggapsincholesteroltreatmentguidelinesforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasebasedonavailablerandomisedclinicaltrialevidencetherotterdamstudy
AT francooscarh assessinggapsincholesteroltreatmentguidelinesforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasebasedonavailablerandomisedclinicaltrialevidencetherotterdamstudy
AT leeningmaartenjg assessinggapsincholesteroltreatmentguidelinesforprimarypreventionofcardiovasculardiseasebasedonavailablerandomisedclinicaltrialevidencetherotterdamstudy