Cargando…
Performance analysis of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodules in CT at different slice thicknesses
We study the performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for lung nodules in computed tomography (CT) as a function of slice thickness. In addition, we propose and compare three different training methodologies for utilizing nonhomogeneous thickness training data (i.e., composed of cases...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29487880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.014504 |
_version_ | 1783300965550522368 |
---|---|
author | Narayanan, Barath Narayanan Hardie, Russell Craig Kebede, Temesguen Messay |
author_facet | Narayanan, Barath Narayanan Hardie, Russell Craig Kebede, Temesguen Messay |
author_sort | Narayanan, Barath Narayanan |
collection | PubMed |
description | We study the performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for lung nodules in computed tomography (CT) as a function of slice thickness. In addition, we propose and compare three different training methodologies for utilizing nonhomogeneous thickness training data (i.e., composed of cases with different slice thicknesses). These methods are (1) aggregate training using the entire suite of data at their native thickness, (2) homogeneous subset training that uses only the subset of training data that matches each testing case, and (3) resampling all training and testing cases to a common thickness. We believe this study has important implications for how CT is acquired, processed, and stored. We make use of 192 CT cases acquired at a thickness of 1.25 mm and 283 cases at 2.5 mm. These data are from the publicly available Lung Nodule Analysis 2016 dataset. In our study, CAD performance at 2.5 mm is comparable with that at 1.25 mm and is much better than at higher thicknesses. Also, resampling all training and testing cases to 2.5 mm provides the best performance among the three training methods compared in terms of accuracy, memory consumption, and computational time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5818068 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58180682019-02-19 Performance analysis of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodules in CT at different slice thicknesses Narayanan, Barath Narayanan Hardie, Russell Craig Kebede, Temesguen Messay J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Computer-Aided Diagnosis We study the performance of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system for lung nodules in computed tomography (CT) as a function of slice thickness. In addition, we propose and compare three different training methodologies for utilizing nonhomogeneous thickness training data (i.e., composed of cases with different slice thicknesses). These methods are (1) aggregate training using the entire suite of data at their native thickness, (2) homogeneous subset training that uses only the subset of training data that matches each testing case, and (3) resampling all training and testing cases to a common thickness. We believe this study has important implications for how CT is acquired, processed, and stored. We make use of 192 CT cases acquired at a thickness of 1.25 mm and 283 cases at 2.5 mm. These data are from the publicly available Lung Nodule Analysis 2016 dataset. In our study, CAD performance at 2.5 mm is comparable with that at 1.25 mm and is much better than at higher thicknesses. Also, resampling all training and testing cases to 2.5 mm provides the best performance among the three training methods compared in terms of accuracy, memory consumption, and computational time. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2018-02-19 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5818068/ /pubmed/29487880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.014504 Text en © The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI. |
spellingShingle | Computer-Aided Diagnosis Narayanan, Barath Narayanan Hardie, Russell Craig Kebede, Temesguen Messay Performance analysis of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodules in CT at different slice thicknesses |
title | Performance analysis of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodules in CT at different slice thicknesses |
title_full | Performance analysis of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodules in CT at different slice thicknesses |
title_fullStr | Performance analysis of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodules in CT at different slice thicknesses |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance analysis of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodules in CT at different slice thicknesses |
title_short | Performance analysis of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodules in CT at different slice thicknesses |
title_sort | performance analysis of a computer-aided detection system for lung nodules in ct at different slice thicknesses |
topic | Computer-Aided Diagnosis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29487880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.014504 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT narayananbarathnarayanan performanceanalysisofacomputeraideddetectionsystemforlungnodulesinctatdifferentslicethicknesses AT hardierussellcraig performanceanalysisofacomputeraideddetectionsystemforlungnodulesinctatdifferentslicethicknesses AT kebedetemesguenmessay performanceanalysisofacomputeraideddetectionsystemforlungnodulesinctatdifferentslicethicknesses |