Cargando…

Electrophysiologic testing aids diagnosis and subtyping of myoclonus

OBJECTIVE: To determine the contribution of electrophysiologic testing in the diagnosis and anatomical classification of myoclonus. METHODS: Participants with a clinical diagnosis of myoclonus were prospectively recruited, each undergoing a videotaped clinical examination and battery of electrophysi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zutt, Rodi, Elting, Jan W., van Zijl, Jonathan C., van der Hoeven, J. Han, Roosendaal, Christiaan M., Gelauff, Jeannette M., Peall, Kathryn J., Tijssen, Marina A.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29352095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004996
_version_ 1783300980555644928
author Zutt, Rodi
Elting, Jan W.
van Zijl, Jonathan C.
van der Hoeven, J. Han
Roosendaal, Christiaan M.
Gelauff, Jeannette M.
Peall, Kathryn J.
Tijssen, Marina A.J.
author_facet Zutt, Rodi
Elting, Jan W.
van Zijl, Jonathan C.
van der Hoeven, J. Han
Roosendaal, Christiaan M.
Gelauff, Jeannette M.
Peall, Kathryn J.
Tijssen, Marina A.J.
author_sort Zutt, Rodi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the contribution of electrophysiologic testing in the diagnosis and anatomical classification of myoclonus. METHODS: Participants with a clinical diagnosis of myoclonus were prospectively recruited, each undergoing a videotaped clinical examination and battery of electrophysiologic tests. The diagnosis of myoclonus and its subtype was reviewed after 6 months in the context of the electrophysiologic findings and specialist review of the videotaped clinical examination. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients with myoclonus were recruited. Initial clinical anatomical classification included 25 patients with cortical myoclonus, 7 with subcortical myoclonus, 2 with spinal myoclonus, and 15 with functional myoclonic jerks. In 23 cases, clinical anatomical classification was not possible because of the complexity of the movement disorder. Electrophysiologic testing was completed in 66, with agreement of myoclonus in 60 (91%) and its subtype in 28 (47%) cases. Subsequent clinical review by a movement disorder specialist agreed with the electrophysiologic findings in 52 of 60; in the remaining 8, electrophysiologic testing was inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Electrophysiologic testing is an important additional tool in the diagnosis and anatomical classification of myoclonus, also aiding in decision-making regarding therapeutic management. Further development of testing criteria is necessary to optimize its use in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5818165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58181652018-02-22 Electrophysiologic testing aids diagnosis and subtyping of myoclonus Zutt, Rodi Elting, Jan W. van Zijl, Jonathan C. van der Hoeven, J. Han Roosendaal, Christiaan M. Gelauff, Jeannette M. Peall, Kathryn J. Tijssen, Marina A.J. Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the contribution of electrophysiologic testing in the diagnosis and anatomical classification of myoclonus. METHODS: Participants with a clinical diagnosis of myoclonus were prospectively recruited, each undergoing a videotaped clinical examination and battery of electrophysiologic tests. The diagnosis of myoclonus and its subtype was reviewed after 6 months in the context of the electrophysiologic findings and specialist review of the videotaped clinical examination. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients with myoclonus were recruited. Initial clinical anatomical classification included 25 patients with cortical myoclonus, 7 with subcortical myoclonus, 2 with spinal myoclonus, and 15 with functional myoclonic jerks. In 23 cases, clinical anatomical classification was not possible because of the complexity of the movement disorder. Electrophysiologic testing was completed in 66, with agreement of myoclonus in 60 (91%) and its subtype in 28 (47%) cases. Subsequent clinical review by a movement disorder specialist agreed with the electrophysiologic findings in 52 of 60; in the remaining 8, electrophysiologic testing was inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Electrophysiologic testing is an important additional tool in the diagnosis and anatomical classification of myoclonus, also aiding in decision-making regarding therapeutic management. Further development of testing criteria is necessary to optimize its use in clinical practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5818165/ /pubmed/29352095 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004996 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Zutt, Rodi
Elting, Jan W.
van Zijl, Jonathan C.
van der Hoeven, J. Han
Roosendaal, Christiaan M.
Gelauff, Jeannette M.
Peall, Kathryn J.
Tijssen, Marina A.J.
Electrophysiologic testing aids diagnosis and subtyping of myoclonus
title Electrophysiologic testing aids diagnosis and subtyping of myoclonus
title_full Electrophysiologic testing aids diagnosis and subtyping of myoclonus
title_fullStr Electrophysiologic testing aids diagnosis and subtyping of myoclonus
title_full_unstemmed Electrophysiologic testing aids diagnosis and subtyping of myoclonus
title_short Electrophysiologic testing aids diagnosis and subtyping of myoclonus
title_sort electrophysiologic testing aids diagnosis and subtyping of myoclonus
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29352095
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004996
work_keys_str_mv AT zuttrodi electrophysiologictestingaidsdiagnosisandsubtypingofmyoclonus
AT eltingjanw electrophysiologictestingaidsdiagnosisandsubtypingofmyoclonus
AT vanzijljonathanc electrophysiologictestingaidsdiagnosisandsubtypingofmyoclonus
AT vanderhoevenjhan electrophysiologictestingaidsdiagnosisandsubtypingofmyoclonus
AT roosendaalchristiaanm electrophysiologictestingaidsdiagnosisandsubtypingofmyoclonus
AT gelauffjeannettem electrophysiologictestingaidsdiagnosisandsubtypingofmyoclonus
AT peallkathrynj electrophysiologictestingaidsdiagnosisandsubtypingofmyoclonus
AT tijssenmarinaaj electrophysiologictestingaidsdiagnosisandsubtypingofmyoclonus