Cargando…
Quantitative analysis of phantom studies of (111)In and (68)Ga imaging of neuroendocrine tumours
BACKGROUND: Nuclear medicine imaging of neuroendocrine tumours is performed either by SPECT/CT imaging, using (111)In-octreotide or by PET/CT imaging using (68)Ga-radiolabelled somatostatin analogs. These imaging techniques will give different image quality and different detection thresholds for tum...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29460190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0204-0 |
_version_ | 1783301007419113472 |
---|---|
author | Jönsson, L. Stenvall, A. Mattsson, E. Larsson, E. Sundlöv, A. Ohlsson, T. Hindorf, C. |
author_facet | Jönsson, L. Stenvall, A. Mattsson, E. Larsson, E. Sundlöv, A. Ohlsson, T. Hindorf, C. |
author_sort | Jönsson, L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nuclear medicine imaging of neuroendocrine tumours is performed either by SPECT/CT imaging, using (111)In-octreotide or by PET/CT imaging using (68)Ga-radiolabelled somatostatin analogs. These imaging techniques will give different image quality and different detection thresholds for tumours, depending on size and activity uptake. The aim was to evaluate the image quality for (111)In-SPECT and (68)Ga-PET imaging, i.e. the smallest volume possible to visualize for different source-to-background activity ratios. The accuracy of quantification of lesion volume and activity was also investigated to develop an objective evaluation for radionuclide therapy eligibility. The phantom study was performed using the NEMA IEC Body Phantom with six hot spheres having inner diameters of 10, 13, 17, 22, 28, and 37 mm, filled with either (68)Ga or (111)In with sphere-to-background ratios (SBRs) of no background activity, 5:1, 2.5:1, and 1.25:1. Activity ratios of 1.25:1 and 2.5:1 are clinically found for lesions close to the liver and spleen. Clinical acquisition and reconstruction protocols were applied. Line profiles were drawn to evaluate the smallest detectable volume within a given SBR. Recovery curves based on threshold-based VOIs, threshold-based VOIs adapted to the background and CT-based ROIs were obtained for all SBRs and sphere diameters, allowing for quantification. RESULTS: The 10-mm sphere was not possible to detect in SPECT images. It was detectable in PET images for SBRs of 2.5:1 and higher. In a background corresponding to the activity uptake in the liver, spheres larger than 22–37 mm were detectable in the (111)In-SPECT images and spheres larger than 13–22 mm were detectable in the (68)Ga-PET images. The maximum activity concentration was accurately quantified for spheres larger than 22 mm in the PET images; however, the quantification was impaired by sphere size and background activity. CONCLUSIONS: It was not possible to detect the 10-mm sphere in any of the SPECT images. In a background corresponding to the activity uptake in the liver, spheres larger than approximately 30 mm were visible in the (111)In-SPECT images and spheres larger than approximately 17 mm were visible in the (68)Ga-PET images. Sphere diameter and background activity strongly affect the possibility of a correct quantification. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5818391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58183912018-02-27 Quantitative analysis of phantom studies of (111)In and (68)Ga imaging of neuroendocrine tumours Jönsson, L. Stenvall, A. Mattsson, E. Larsson, E. Sundlöv, A. Ohlsson, T. Hindorf, C. EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: Nuclear medicine imaging of neuroendocrine tumours is performed either by SPECT/CT imaging, using (111)In-octreotide or by PET/CT imaging using (68)Ga-radiolabelled somatostatin analogs. These imaging techniques will give different image quality and different detection thresholds for tumours, depending on size and activity uptake. The aim was to evaluate the image quality for (111)In-SPECT and (68)Ga-PET imaging, i.e. the smallest volume possible to visualize for different source-to-background activity ratios. The accuracy of quantification of lesion volume and activity was also investigated to develop an objective evaluation for radionuclide therapy eligibility. The phantom study was performed using the NEMA IEC Body Phantom with six hot spheres having inner diameters of 10, 13, 17, 22, 28, and 37 mm, filled with either (68)Ga or (111)In with sphere-to-background ratios (SBRs) of no background activity, 5:1, 2.5:1, and 1.25:1. Activity ratios of 1.25:1 and 2.5:1 are clinically found for lesions close to the liver and spleen. Clinical acquisition and reconstruction protocols were applied. Line profiles were drawn to evaluate the smallest detectable volume within a given SBR. Recovery curves based on threshold-based VOIs, threshold-based VOIs adapted to the background and CT-based ROIs were obtained for all SBRs and sphere diameters, allowing for quantification. RESULTS: The 10-mm sphere was not possible to detect in SPECT images. It was detectable in PET images for SBRs of 2.5:1 and higher. In a background corresponding to the activity uptake in the liver, spheres larger than 22–37 mm were detectable in the (111)In-SPECT images and spheres larger than 13–22 mm were detectable in the (68)Ga-PET images. The maximum activity concentration was accurately quantified for spheres larger than 22 mm in the PET images; however, the quantification was impaired by sphere size and background activity. CONCLUSIONS: It was not possible to detect the 10-mm sphere in any of the SPECT images. In a background corresponding to the activity uptake in the liver, spheres larger than approximately 30 mm were visible in the (111)In-SPECT images and spheres larger than approximately 17 mm were visible in the (68)Ga-PET images. Sphere diameter and background activity strongly affect the possibility of a correct quantification. Springer International Publishing 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5818391/ /pubmed/29460190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0204-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jönsson, L. Stenvall, A. Mattsson, E. Larsson, E. Sundlöv, A. Ohlsson, T. Hindorf, C. Quantitative analysis of phantom studies of (111)In and (68)Ga imaging of neuroendocrine tumours |
title | Quantitative analysis of phantom studies of (111)In and (68)Ga imaging of neuroendocrine tumours |
title_full | Quantitative analysis of phantom studies of (111)In and (68)Ga imaging of neuroendocrine tumours |
title_fullStr | Quantitative analysis of phantom studies of (111)In and (68)Ga imaging of neuroendocrine tumours |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative analysis of phantom studies of (111)In and (68)Ga imaging of neuroendocrine tumours |
title_short | Quantitative analysis of phantom studies of (111)In and (68)Ga imaging of neuroendocrine tumours |
title_sort | quantitative analysis of phantom studies of (111)in and (68)ga imaging of neuroendocrine tumours |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29460190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-018-0204-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonssonl quantitativeanalysisofphantomstudiesof111inand68gaimagingofneuroendocrinetumours AT stenvalla quantitativeanalysisofphantomstudiesof111inand68gaimagingofneuroendocrinetumours AT mattssone quantitativeanalysisofphantomstudiesof111inand68gaimagingofneuroendocrinetumours AT larssone quantitativeanalysisofphantomstudiesof111inand68gaimagingofneuroendocrinetumours AT sundlova quantitativeanalysisofphantomstudiesof111inand68gaimagingofneuroendocrinetumours AT ohlssont quantitativeanalysisofphantomstudiesof111inand68gaimagingofneuroendocrinetumours AT hindorfc quantitativeanalysisofphantomstudiesof111inand68gaimagingofneuroendocrinetumours |