Cargando…
Regulation of Internet-based Genetic Testing: Challenges for Australia and Other Jurisdictions
The Internet currently enables unprecedented ease of access for direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing, with saliva collection kits posted directly to consumer homes from anywhere in the world. This poses new challenges for local jurisdictions in regulating genetic testing, traditionally a tightly...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29497607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00024 |
_version_ | 1783301010272288768 |
---|---|
author | Tiller, Jane Lacaze, Paul |
author_facet | Tiller, Jane Lacaze, Paul |
author_sort | Tiller, Jane |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Internet currently enables unprecedented ease of access for direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing, with saliva collection kits posted directly to consumer homes from anywhere in the world. This poses new challenges for local jurisdictions in regulating genetic testing, traditionally a tightly-regulated industry. Some Internet-based genetic tests have the capacity to cause significant confusion or harm to consumers who are unaware of the risks or potential variability in quality. The emergence of some online products of questionable content, unsupported by adequate scientific evidence, is a cause for concern. Proliferation of such products in the absence of regulation has the potential to damage public trust in accredited and established clinical genetic testing during a critical period of evidence generation for genomics. Here, we explore the challenges arising from the emergence of Internet-based DTC genetic testing. In particular, there are challenges in regulating unaccredited or potentially harmful Internet-based DTC genetic testing products. In Australia, challenges exist for the Therapeutic Goods Administration, which oversees regulation of the genetic testing sector. Concerns and challenges faced in Australia are likely to reflect those of other comparable non-US jurisdictions. Here, we summarize current Australian regulation, highlight concerns, and offer recommendations on how Australia and other comparable jurisdictions might be more proactive in addressing this emerging public health issue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5818403 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58184032018-03-01 Regulation of Internet-based Genetic Testing: Challenges for Australia and Other Jurisdictions Tiller, Jane Lacaze, Paul Front Public Health Public Health The Internet currently enables unprecedented ease of access for direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing, with saliva collection kits posted directly to consumer homes from anywhere in the world. This poses new challenges for local jurisdictions in regulating genetic testing, traditionally a tightly-regulated industry. Some Internet-based genetic tests have the capacity to cause significant confusion or harm to consumers who are unaware of the risks or potential variability in quality. The emergence of some online products of questionable content, unsupported by adequate scientific evidence, is a cause for concern. Proliferation of such products in the absence of regulation has the potential to damage public trust in accredited and established clinical genetic testing during a critical period of evidence generation for genomics. Here, we explore the challenges arising from the emergence of Internet-based DTC genetic testing. In particular, there are challenges in regulating unaccredited or potentially harmful Internet-based DTC genetic testing products. In Australia, challenges exist for the Therapeutic Goods Administration, which oversees regulation of the genetic testing sector. Concerns and challenges faced in Australia are likely to reflect those of other comparable non-US jurisdictions. Here, we summarize current Australian regulation, highlight concerns, and offer recommendations on how Australia and other comparable jurisdictions might be more proactive in addressing this emerging public health issue. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5818403/ /pubmed/29497607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00024 Text en Copyright © 2018 Tiller and Lacaze. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Tiller, Jane Lacaze, Paul Regulation of Internet-based Genetic Testing: Challenges for Australia and Other Jurisdictions |
title | Regulation of Internet-based Genetic Testing: Challenges for Australia and Other Jurisdictions |
title_full | Regulation of Internet-based Genetic Testing: Challenges for Australia and Other Jurisdictions |
title_fullStr | Regulation of Internet-based Genetic Testing: Challenges for Australia and Other Jurisdictions |
title_full_unstemmed | Regulation of Internet-based Genetic Testing: Challenges for Australia and Other Jurisdictions |
title_short | Regulation of Internet-based Genetic Testing: Challenges for Australia and Other Jurisdictions |
title_sort | regulation of internet-based genetic testing: challenges for australia and other jurisdictions |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29497607 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tillerjane regulationofinternetbasedgenetictestingchallengesforaustraliaandotherjurisdictions AT lacazepaul regulationofinternetbasedgenetictestingchallengesforaustraliaandotherjurisdictions |