Cargando…

Evolutionary trends in animal ribosomal DNA loci: introduction to a new online database

Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) loci encoding 5S and 45S (18S-5.8S-28S) rRNAs are important components of eukaryotic chromosomes. Here, we set up the animal rDNA database containing cytogenetic information about these loci in 1343 animal species (264 families) collected from 542 publications. The data are base...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sochorová, Jana, Garcia, Sònia, Gálvez, Francisco, Symonová, Radka, Kovařík, Aleš
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29192338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-017-0651-8
_version_ 1783301064021245952
author Sochorová, Jana
Garcia, Sònia
Gálvez, Francisco
Symonová, Radka
Kovařík, Aleš
author_facet Sochorová, Jana
Garcia, Sònia
Gálvez, Francisco
Symonová, Radka
Kovařík, Aleš
author_sort Sochorová, Jana
collection PubMed
description Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) loci encoding 5S and 45S (18S-5.8S-28S) rRNAs are important components of eukaryotic chromosomes. Here, we set up the animal rDNA database containing cytogenetic information about these loci in 1343 animal species (264 families) collected from 542 publications. The data are based on in situ hybridisation studies (both radioactive and fluorescent) carried out in major groups of vertebrates (fish, reptiles, amphibians, birds, and mammals) and invertebrates (mostly insects and mollusks). The database is accessible online at www.animalrdnadatabase.com. The median number of 45S and 5S sites was close to two per diploid chromosome set for both rDNAs despite large variation (1–74 for 5S and 1–54 for 45S sites). No significant correlation between the number of 5S and 45S rDNA loci was observed, suggesting that their distribution and amplification across the chromosomes follow independent evolutionary trajectories. Each group, irrespective of taxonomic classification, contained rDNA sites at any chromosome location. However, the distal and pericentromeric positions were the most prevalent (> 75% karyotypes) for 45S loci, while the position of 5S loci was more variable. We also examined potential relationships between molecular attributes of rDNA (homogenisation and expression) and cytogenetic parameters such as rDNA positions, chromosome number, and morphology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00412-017-0651-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5818627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58186272018-02-27 Evolutionary trends in animal ribosomal DNA loci: introduction to a new online database Sochorová, Jana Garcia, Sònia Gálvez, Francisco Symonová, Radka Kovařík, Aleš Chromosoma Original Article Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) loci encoding 5S and 45S (18S-5.8S-28S) rRNAs are important components of eukaryotic chromosomes. Here, we set up the animal rDNA database containing cytogenetic information about these loci in 1343 animal species (264 families) collected from 542 publications. The data are based on in situ hybridisation studies (both radioactive and fluorescent) carried out in major groups of vertebrates (fish, reptiles, amphibians, birds, and mammals) and invertebrates (mostly insects and mollusks). The database is accessible online at www.animalrdnadatabase.com. The median number of 45S and 5S sites was close to two per diploid chromosome set for both rDNAs despite large variation (1–74 for 5S and 1–54 for 45S sites). No significant correlation between the number of 5S and 45S rDNA loci was observed, suggesting that their distribution and amplification across the chromosomes follow independent evolutionary trajectories. Each group, irrespective of taxonomic classification, contained rDNA sites at any chromosome location. However, the distal and pericentromeric positions were the most prevalent (> 75% karyotypes) for 45S loci, while the position of 5S loci was more variable. We also examined potential relationships between molecular attributes of rDNA (homogenisation and expression) and cytogenetic parameters such as rDNA positions, chromosome number, and morphology. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00412-017-0651-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-11-30 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5818627/ /pubmed/29192338 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-017-0651-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sochorová, Jana
Garcia, Sònia
Gálvez, Francisco
Symonová, Radka
Kovařík, Aleš
Evolutionary trends in animal ribosomal DNA loci: introduction to a new online database
title Evolutionary trends in animal ribosomal DNA loci: introduction to a new online database
title_full Evolutionary trends in animal ribosomal DNA loci: introduction to a new online database
title_fullStr Evolutionary trends in animal ribosomal DNA loci: introduction to a new online database
title_full_unstemmed Evolutionary trends in animal ribosomal DNA loci: introduction to a new online database
title_short Evolutionary trends in animal ribosomal DNA loci: introduction to a new online database
title_sort evolutionary trends in animal ribosomal dna loci: introduction to a new online database
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5818627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29192338
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-017-0651-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sochorovajana evolutionarytrendsinanimalribosomaldnalociintroductiontoanewonlinedatabase
AT garciasonia evolutionarytrendsinanimalribosomaldnalociintroductiontoanewonlinedatabase
AT galvezfrancisco evolutionarytrendsinanimalribosomaldnalociintroductiontoanewonlinedatabase
AT symonovaradka evolutionarytrendsinanimalribosomaldnalociintroductiontoanewonlinedatabase
AT kovarikales evolutionarytrendsinanimalribosomaldnalociintroductiontoanewonlinedatabase